by Kozmix » Tue Jul 24, 2018 10:01 am
by Marilyn Manson Freaks » Tue Jul 24, 2018 10:34 am
by Benevolent Thomas » Tue Jul 24, 2018 11:09 am
Ballotonia wrote:Personally, I think there's something seriously wrong with a game if it willfully allows the destruction of longtime player communities in favor of kids whose sole purpose is to enjoy ruining the game for others.
by United Massachusetts » Tue Jul 24, 2018 1:26 pm
Benevolent Thomas wrote:Linking the region of Anarchy would be slightly helpful.
As someone who is admittedly ignorant when it comes to the politics and personalities of the General Assembly, I think I'm in favor of this proposal. I understand that Sierra Lyricalia is a GA Secretariat and I believe that part of this proposal tries to outline those responsibilities. Is it illegal to name them as a GA Sec or commend them solely based on their actions as a GA Sec like it would be to commend a site staff member? I view it as an in-character role, so please correct me if I've misunderstood. As a defender, I start having flashbacks the second Anarchy is mentioned. I know Sierra Lyricalia has been delegate of the region for significant portions of its history. In the past, delegates of that region had a habit of banning defenders from the region after being liberated by them, much to the region's detriment. Was SL one of these delegates?
by Benevolent Thomas » Tue Jul 24, 2018 2:01 pm
United Massachusetts wrote:Benevolent Thomas wrote:Linking the region of Anarchy would be slightly helpful.
As someone who is admittedly ignorant when it comes to the politics and personalities of the General Assembly, I think I'm in favor of this proposal. I understand that Sierra Lyricalia is a GA Secretariat and I believe that part of this proposal tries to outline those responsibilities. Is it illegal to name them as a GA Sec or commend them solely based on their actions as a GA Sec like it would be to commend a site staff member? I view it as an in-character role, so please correct me if I've misunderstood. As a defender, I start having flashbacks the second Anarchy is mentioned. I know Sierra Lyricalia has been delegate of the region for significant portions of its history. In the past, delegates of that region had a habit of banning defenders from the region after being liberated by them, much to the region's detriment. Was SL one of these delegates?
It is illegal. I tried to do so with CD.
Ballotonia wrote:Personally, I think there's something seriously wrong with a game if it willfully allows the destruction of longtime player communities in favor of kids whose sole purpose is to enjoy ruining the game for others.
by Marilyn Manson Freaks » Tue Jul 24, 2018 3:31 pm
by Kozmix » Wed Jul 25, 2018 8:39 am
Benevolent Thomas wrote:Linking the region of Anarchy would be slightly helpful.
Benevolent Thomas wrote:As someone who is admittedly ignorant when it comes to the politics and personalities of the General Assembly, I think I'm in favor of this proposal. I understand that Sierra Lyricalia is a GA Secretariat and I believe that part of this proposal tries to outline those responsibilities. Is it illegal to name them as a GA Sec or commend them solely based on their actions as a GA Sec like it would be to commend a site staff member? I view it as an in-character role, so please correct me if I've misunderstood.
Benevolent Thomas wrote:As a defender, I start having flashbacks the second Anarchy is mentioned. I know Sierra Lyricalia has been delegate of the region for significant portions of its history. In the past, delegates of that region had a habit of banning defenders from the region after being liberated by them, much to the region's detriment. Was SL one of these delegates?
by YoriZ » Wed Jul 25, 2018 1:17 pm
by Ransium » Wed Jul 25, 2018 8:51 pm
by Kozmix » Thu Jul 26, 2018 6:38 am
Ransium wrote:I think SL's role in Anarchy needs more than just a line. Other than that, I think SL obviously merits commendation and this is a good start.
by Imperium Anglorum » Thu Jul 26, 2018 7:15 am
by Lord Dominator » Sun Jul 29, 2018 6:45 pm
by Wrapper » Sun Jul 29, 2018 7:01 pm
Lord Dominator wrote:From my memory, no GenSec duty can be mentioned, as that would violate R1.
GenSec duties being legality rulings and queue management, any other GA thing is fair game
by Ransium » Sun Jul 29, 2018 8:45 pm
Wrapper wrote:Lord Dominator wrote:From my memory, no GenSec duty can be mentioned, as that would violate R1.
GenSec duties being legality rulings and queue management, any other GA thing is fair game
Indeed. Also, for the record, SL was briefly an Issues Editor, and any issues work done while an IE (including issues written/submitted/published while an IE) would violate R1 as well.
by Lord Dominator » Sun Jul 29, 2018 8:55 pm
by Kozmix » Mon Jul 30, 2018 4:14 am
by Merni » Mon Jul 30, 2018 4:21 am
by Lord Dominator » Mon Jul 30, 2018 8:33 am
by Kozmix » Wed Aug 01, 2018 6:07 am
Taken care of. Thank youMerni wrote:In the "Amazed" and "Further amazed" clauses you refer to Steph Zakawale instead of Steph Zakalwe.
by Marilyn Manson Freaks » Wed Aug 01, 2018 7:39 am
by United Massachusetts » Wed Aug 01, 2018 8:36 am
Marilyn Manson Freaks wrote:Any comments on the current draft?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement