NATION

PASSWORD

[DRAFT] Commend Equinox

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Sargon Reman
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 182
Founded: Jun 01, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Sargon Reman » Fri Aug 31, 2018 12:12 pm

The resolution seems a bit to wordy.

Just because Falconias was Founder doesn't mean anything.
Author of SC Resolution #265, #281...and #288.

User avatar
Wabbitslayah
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 388
Founded: Apr 19, 2009
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Wabbitslayah » Fri Aug 31, 2018 12:37 pm

Wopruthien wrote:Against.

The region was founded by Falconias it deserves to be condemned for that alone.

Asy has it now, so it's been freed from Falc's vile grasp!
Former Delegate of the Rejected Realms

User avatar
Tyrehennia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 23
Founded: Jun 06, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Tyrehennia » Mon Sep 03, 2018 11:06 am

Alright, depending on how everything goes, I may make some minor edits (syntax, punctuation, nothing dramatic) but this looks ready for submission. I'd appreciate anyone checking for rules violations, but our next challenge is making quorum (if anyone has any advice on that).

User avatar
Cosmopolitan borovan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1032
Founded: Jan 18, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Cosmopolitan borovan » Mon Sep 03, 2018 11:14 am

Tyrehennia wrote:Alright, depending on how everything goes, I may make some minor edits (syntax, punctuation, nothing dramatic) but this looks ready for submission. I'd appreciate anyone checking for rules violations, but our next challenge is making quorum (if anyone has any advice on that).

Looks good. Just does social media and communications platform violate rules? Is it outside the NS world?

To make it quorom just make a statement why a delegate should support it and telegram all the delegates.

User avatar
Cosmopolitan borovan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1032
Founded: Jan 18, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Cosmopolitan borovan » Tue Sep 04, 2018 12:04 pm

Rereading this and yeah seems legal

Good

User avatar
Benevolent Thomas
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1483
Founded: Jun 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Benevolent Thomas » Tue Sep 04, 2018 6:23 pm

Tyrehennia wrote:
Wopruthien wrote:Against.

The region was founded by Falconias it deserves to be condemned for that alone.


Is there a legitimate reason for that opinion, or is that just a personal grudge you bear?

It is a old meme. From a time before sharing images on social media was the peak of human culture.

Like other great figures of folklore, Falconias never existed as an individual. They are a combination of stories and myths that eventually created the legend of Falconias The Great, The infiltrator of Europeia and Liberator of the FRA.
Ballotonia wrote:Personally, I think there's something seriously wrong with a game if it willfully allows the destruction of longtime player communities in favor of kids whose sole purpose is to enjoy ruining the game for others.

User avatar
Alustrian
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 106
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Alustrian » Wed Sep 05, 2018 10:25 pm

It certainly had its share of dramatic personalities, but Equinox at its peak was still one of the most interesting communities that I have seen in NS.

User avatar
Indo States
Minister
 
Posts: 3317
Founded: Jan 05, 2018
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Indo States » Thu Sep 06, 2018 1:04 am

Image
WA FINAL DRAFT
Indo States Supports Commend Equinox.
Fédération Fatimanienné - Fatiman Federation
Country of Freedom and Education


I DO NOT USE NATIONSTATES STATS

User avatar
Tyrehennia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 23
Founded: Jun 06, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Tyrehennia » Fri Sep 21, 2018 8:59 pm

Thank you all for your overwhelming support and your comments (truly something I did not expect as a beginner at writing resolutions). As part of Equinox's traditional overly dramatic flourish, the proposal is going out tomorrow, on the occasion of the Autumnal Equinox. Please be aware, delegates, to endorse this proposal if you so choose.

Much thanks.
Viva Equinox, Nunc et Usque in Aeternum.

DECLARATION OF SUBMISSION, FINAL AND BINDING.

User avatar
Cosmopolitan borovan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1032
Founded: Jan 18, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Cosmopolitan borovan » Sat Sep 22, 2018 11:52 am

Tyrehennia wrote:Thank you all for your overwhelming support and your comments (truly something I did not expect as a beginner at writing resolutions). As part of Equinox's traditional overly dramatic flourish, the proposal is going out tomorrow, on the occasion of the Autumnal Equinox. Please be aware, delegates, to endorse this proposal if you so choose.

Much thanks.
Viva Equinox, Nunc et Usque in Aeternum.

DECLARATION OF SUBMISSION, FINAL AND BINDING.

Guide
Be sure to telegram every delegate
Last edited by Cosmopolitan borovan on Sat Sep 22, 2018 11:54 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Tyrehennia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 23
Founded: Jun 06, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Tyrehennia » Sat Sep 22, 2018 6:45 pm

Proposal submitted! Make sure to endorse, and I’ll be writing up campaign telegrams.

Thanks to all.

User avatar
Cosmopolitan borovan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1032
Founded: Jan 18, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Cosmopolitan borovan » Sat Sep 22, 2018 8:45 pm

Well good luck

User avatar
Wrapper
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6020
Founded: Antiquity
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wrapper » Sun Sep 23, 2018 2:18 pm

Tyrehennia wrote:a raiding and role-playing guild

I'm on the fence here as to whether this is an R4 violation. Normally, any mention of RPing violates R4(c).

User avatar
Nau States
Attaché
 
Posts: 85
Founded: Feb 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nau States » Sun Sep 23, 2018 2:21 pm

I'm for!
((OOC: Only because I was their ambassador from Pacifica for a week. Still, cool place, nice people, in-depth RP.))
I have known adventures, seen places you people will never see, I've been Offworld and back...frontiers! I've stood on the back deck of a blinker bound for the Plutition Camps with sweat in my eyes watching the stars fight on the shoulder of Orion. I've felt wind in my hair, riding test boats off the black galaxies and seen an attack fleet burn like a match and disappear. I've seen it...felt it!

User avatar
Tyrehennia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 23
Founded: Jun 06, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Tyrehennia » Sun Sep 23, 2018 5:04 pm

Wrapper wrote:
Tyrehennia wrote:a raiding and role-playing guild

I'm on the fence here as to whether this is an R4 violation. Normally, any mention of RPing violates R4(c).


Jakker did declare it legal, but I'd also say that "role-play" in this case refers to an off-site practice (not on NS) in which national representatives engage, and much of it is not pertinent to role play as nations but more just role play in general, not relevant to NS-related goings ons. Consider it an international sport, if you will.

Tell me what you think; I just don't want to see another dramatic late pull-out like the last one in the WA.

Nau States wrote:I'm for!
((OOC: Only because I was their ambassador from Pacifica for a week. Still, cool place, nice people, in-depth RP.))


Thanks!

By the way, to any delegates or personal aides who may be watching, and I can't stress this enough, VOTE VOTE VOTE!

User avatar
Ransium
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6788
Founded: Oct 17, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Ransium » Sun Sep 23, 2018 6:40 pm

I think it’s illegal. R4c I don’t see how the role play mention here doesn’t acknowledge this is a game.

Commended by SC 236,
WA Delegate of Forest from March 20th, 2007 to August 19, 2020.
Author of WA Resolutions: SC 221, SC 224, SC 233, SC 243, SC 265, GA 403, GA 439, GA 445,GA 463,GA 465,
Issues Editor since January 20th, 2017 with some down time.
Author of 27 issues. First editor of 44.
Moderator since November 10th 2017 with some down time.

User avatar
Ligmaistan
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Sep 19, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Ligmaistan » Sun Sep 23, 2018 7:26 pm

Hello, just wanted to say that I fully support this proposal. I just want to warn you about a few times where you did mention the outside communication. I am worried that this might fall under Rule 4c, and since I support this, I wanted to let you know that others may find that a reason to not bring this to the SC's vote, or to not vote for this. Whether or not this does break Rule 4c is up to interpretation, but it would be one less thing to worry about if you either took that small part out, or changed the wording a bit more than you already have.

Thanks,
The Rogue Nation Of Ligmaistan
Last edited by Ligmaistan on Sun Sep 23, 2018 7:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Tyrehennia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 23
Founded: Jun 06, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Tyrehennia » Sun Sep 23, 2018 9:00 pm

Sigh, I do remember asking for feedback regarding rules violations a few times prior, but oh well. If it doesn’t make quorum, I’ll reword it. If it does, well...

Although role play does again refer to an activity where national delegates “meet” outside of NS (on a regional forum) and where they do not represent their actual nation’s, but if it bothers people, I can fix it.

We’ll see where this ends up.

User avatar
Tyrehennia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 23
Founded: Jun 06, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Tyrehennia » Sun Sep 23, 2018 9:16 pm

Concerns are noted, but further review of 4c has prompted me to conclude that the role play reference I included, which refers to a situation outside of NS (the game mentioned) whereby delegates from their representative “nations” so to speak engage in role playing that is not at all relevant to NS, is not illegal.

(The exact role play I was referring to is on an offsite forum where the role plays don’t involve characters as nations they represent, so I’m trying to argue that this would be more of an international activity or sport rather than actually NS nations representing themselves diplomatically).

Nevertheless, I understand the wording was somewhat vague and easily misconstrued. I’d appreciate some latitude, at least until proposal voting ends.

User avatar
Wabbitslayah
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 388
Founded: Apr 19, 2009
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Wabbitslayah » Sun Sep 23, 2018 10:13 pm

Alustrian wrote:It certainly had its share of dramatic personalities, but Equinox at its peak was still one of the most interesting communities that I have seen in NS.

Like moi?
Former Delegate of the Rejected Realms

User avatar
Tyrehennia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 23
Founded: Jun 06, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Tyrehennia » Mon Sep 24, 2018 6:18 am

Ugh, I need a legal consultant for this kind of thing.

User avatar
Drop Your Pants
Senator
 
Posts: 3860
Founded: Apr 17, 2005
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Drop Your Pants » Mon Sep 24, 2018 6:27 am

Benevolent Thomas wrote:Like other great figures of folklore, Falconias never existed as an individual. They are a combination of stories and myths that eventually created the legend of Falconias The Great, The infiltrator of Europeia and Liberator of the FRA.

Don't forget the diplomacy of a brick.
Happily oblivious to NS Drama and I rarely pay attention beyond 5 minutes

User avatar
Wrapper
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6020
Founded: Antiquity
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wrapper » Mon Sep 24, 2018 6:58 am

Tyrehennia wrote:Jakker did declare it legal, but I'd also say that "role-play" in this case refers to an off-site practice (not on NS) in which national representatives engage, and much of it is not pertinent to role play as nations but more just role play in general, not relevant to NS-related goings ons. Consider it an international sport, if you will.
Tyrehennia wrote:Concerns are noted, but further review of 4c has prompted me to conclude that the role play reference I included, which refers to a situation outside of NS (the game mentioned) whereby delegates from their representative “nations” so to speak engage in role playing that is not at all relevant to NS, is not illegal.

(The exact role play I was referring to is on an offsite forum where the role plays don’t involve characters as nations they represent, so I’m trying to argue that this would be more of an international activity or sport rather than actually NS nations representing themselves diplomatically).

I'm sorry but I can't buy that argument. For the other guilds you mention (defender, military, raiding), you use acceptable terms that deal with nations, not representatives of those nations. I can't see making a special exception for the way this is worded, so I have to agree with Ransium that this is illegal. For what you're describing, I think you can do it without mentioning illegal phrases like roleplay or gameplay.

You're not on track to make quorum anyway, so I suggest withdrawing the proposal, rewording this part, and seeing if there's any other changes you can make to improve the proposal on the whole.

User avatar
Tyrehennia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 23
Founded: Jun 06, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Tyrehennia » Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:36 am

Very well. Proposal withdrawn, and further discussions will be made on how to improve it with the community. Expect an improved draft shortly.

User avatar
Tyrehennia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 23
Founded: Jun 06, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Tyrehennia » Mon Sep 24, 2018 2:10 pm

As part of the procedure henceforth, this bill will be initially revised to simply expunge the part about role playing. Although I wish these concerns were raised earlier when I asked for legality checks, now is as good a time as any to proofread. On a more optimistic note, I’m happy to say that myself and the ground team in Equinox have been discussing improved diplomatic ways to spread the word about the proposal, instead of our last minute scramble. As for quorum, I will say that the telegramming that did occur was more uncoordinated than I’d have liked, and that unfortunately Equinox as a community right now is too small to launch any sort of major interregional communiques.

Let us not get too wrapped up in semantics to overlook the fact that objectively, the Equinox community has been most deserving of recognition and probably needs it now more than ever. It has been taken as a point of regard that Equinox has not sought commendation prior despite having skilled and able writers, due in part to its belief in a region that transcends the NS world and the hysteria that may pockmark it (factions, fascists, fabrications, and fulminations). Its ideals of enthusiasm, compassion, and levity will be sorely missed (for now), but hopefully not forgotten.

Removing one phrase is a bit minor; I think the rest of the proposal is solid if a bit wordy; such is life when one does not spend hours casting stern gaze over WA chambers in passionate, if overeager rumination.

My heartfelt thanks go out to those who supported the resolution, and who will continue to as we progress.
Last edited by Tyrehennia on Mon Sep 24, 2018 2:13 pm, edited 3 times in total.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads