NATION

PASSWORD

[DEFEATED] Condemn The League Of Conservative Nations

A carefully preserved record of the most notable World Assembly debates.
User avatar
Crimsonfield
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Feb 26, 2018
Ex-Nation

[DEFEATED] Condemn The League Of Conservative Nations

Postby Crimsonfield » Tue Jun 05, 2018 11:58 am

Noting the League of Conservative nations calls itself a conservative democracy, dedicated at preserving conservatism in NS.

Understanding the countless regions that have fallen due to League of Conservative nations intrusion causing instability for the sake of there own recruiting program.

Believing that the use of trolling and espionage against a sovereign region is distasteful.

Accepting that fact that the League of Conservative has prevented stability, security, and peace in the United Conservative Nations. Attempting to bring about the regions demise as a new conservative power.

Condemning the League of Conservative Nations for the above statements.

Proposal idea A
Last edited by Ransium on Tue Jun 12, 2018 9:05 pm, edited 5 times in total.
Reason: Changed to AT VOTE

User avatar
Crimsonfield
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Feb 26, 2018
Ex-Nation

Condemn The League Of Conservative Nations

Postby Crimsonfield » Tue Jun 05, 2018 12:04 pm

The World Assembly,

Observing [region=The League Of Conservative Nations] hunger for power and destruction,

Denouncing the LCN's recent threats to invade new regions, for example the U.C.N,

Believing this string of threats of invasions and infiltration must be put to an end,

Appalled by their use of trolling to undermine stability of various Governments,

Stating that a condemnation would send a message to other anti-democratic warmongering regions,

Further Clarifying the LCN claims to be a Democratic Region, yet it has an executive branch made of oppressive "Consuls" appointed by the Leader,

Hereby Condemns [region=The League Of Conservative Nations


Proposal Idea B
Last edited by Crimsonfield on Tue Jun 05, 2018 12:31 pm, edited 6 times in total.

User avatar
Crimsonfield
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Feb 26, 2018
Ex-Nation

Condemn The League Of Conservative Nations

Postby Crimsonfield » Tue Jun 05, 2018 12:06 pm

Please feel free to add anything or discuss this proposal and tell me which draft is better, a or b?

User avatar
Quebecshire
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1911
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Condemn The League Of Conservative Nations

Postby Quebecshire » Tue Jun 05, 2018 12:46 pm

Hello, everyone reading this thread, as an LCN official I feel I should respectfully common on this document, point by point.


PROPOSAL A

Noting the League of Conservative nations calls itself a conservative democracy, dedicated at preserving conservatism in NS. - The LCN, officially, "The Fourth Republic of the League of Conservative Nations" is a Parliamentary Republican Democracy, with a system that was designed as unique to itself. We are neither conservative nor liberal in our system's crafting, as we are an independent and free society.

Understanding the countless regions that have fallen due to League of Conservative nations intrusion causing instability for the sake of there own recruiting program. - The League of Conservative Nations recruitment initiatives in recent time has been sent in stamp used TGs to either newly founded nations or recently founded nations. We have not engaged in recruitments to destabilize regions, and we have actually received several reports from our citizens that your region has done so towards our citizens.

Accepting that fact that the League of Conservative has prevented stability, security, and peace in the United Conservative Nations. Attempting to bring about the regions demise as a new conservative power. - The LCN has no wish to engage in conflict with your region, however, your region has repeatedly made us the target of propaganda (like this document itself) and recruitment attempts towards our members.

PROPOSAL B

Observing [region=The League Of Conservative Nations] hunger for power and destruction, - I mean, without fact, example, this is purely propaganda.

Denouncing the LCN's recent threats to invade new regions, for example the U.C.N, - No officially sanctioned threat by an LCN official to "invade" the UCN has been made.

Believing this string of threats of invasions and infiltration must be put to an end, - I further note the lack of examples and proof.

Stating that a condemnation would send a message to other anti-democratic warmongering regions, - The LCN has a democratic system in which the people elect representatives to form a government led by a Prime Minister, the LCN has made no declarations of war in the formal sense in the times following the CLA crisis of late 2016 and early 2017.

Further Clarifying the LCN claims to be a Democratic Region, yet it has an executive branch made of oppressive "Consuls" appointed by the Leader, - The LCN does not have a "Leader" to appoint Consuls. The only order issued by the Consulate was one which was reviewed by the Assembly and a poll was held on the topic (the result of the aforementioned public poll was followed by the Consulate). If you have any questions to Consulate cycles or functionality feel free to contact me or another LCN official.



Thank you for your time if you have read this, and any questions or comments I am happy to answer.
PATRIOT OF THE LEAGUE REDEEMER OF CONCORD
Defender Moralist | Consul of the LDF | Warden-Lieutenant Emeritus | Commended
Benevolent Thomas wrote:I founded a defender organization out of my dislike of invaders, what invading represents, and my desire to see them suffer.
Pergamon wrote:I must say, you are truly what they deserve.

User avatar
Crimsonfield
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Feb 26, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Crimsonfield » Tue Jun 05, 2018 12:57 pm

Quebecshire wrote:Hello, everyone reading this thread, as an LCN official I feel I should respectfully common on this document, point by point.


PROPOSAL A

Noting the League of Conservative nations calls itself a conservative democracy, dedicated at preserving conservatism in NS. - The LCN, officially, "The Fourth Republic of the League of Conservative Nations" is a Parliamentary Republican Democracy, with a system that was designed as unique to itself. We are neither conservative nor liberal in our system's crafting, as we are an independent and free society.

Understanding the countless regions that have fallen due to League of Conservative nations intrusion causing instability for the sake of there own recruiting program. - The League of Conservative Nations recruitment initiatives in recent time has been sent in stamp used TGs to either newly founded nations or recently founded nations. We have not engaged in recruitments to destabilize regions, and we have actually received several reports from our citizens that your region has done so towards our citizens.

Accepting that fact that the League of Conservative has prevented stability, security, and peace in the United Conservative Nations. Attempting to bring about the regions demise as a new conservative power. - The LCN has no wish to engage in conflict with your region, however, your region has repeatedly made us the target of propaganda (like this document itself) and recruitment attempts towards our members.

PROPOSAL B

Observing [region=The League Of Conservative Nations] hunger for power and destruction, - I mean, without fact, example, this is purely propaganda.

Denouncing the LCN's recent threats to invade new regions, for example the U.C.N, - No officially sanctioned threat by an LCN official to "invade" the UCN has been made.

Believing this string of threats of invasions and infiltration must be put to an end, - I further note the lack of examples and proof.

Stating that a condemnation would send a message to other anti-democratic warmongering regions, - The LCN has a democratic system in which the people elect representatives to form a government led by a Prime Minister, the LCN has made no declarations of war in the formal sense in the times following the CLA crisis of late 2016 and early 2017.

Further Clarifying the LCN claims to be a Democratic Region, yet it has an executive branch made of oppressive "Consuls" appointed by the Leader, - The LCN does not have a "Leader" to appoint Consuls. The only order issued by the Consulate was one which was reviewed by the Assembly and a poll was held on the topic (the result of the aforementioned public poll was followed by the Consulate). If you have any questions to Consulate cycles or functionality feel free to contact me or another LCN official.



Thank you for your time if you have read this, and any questions or comments I am happy to answer.

Proposal A
"The LCN, officially, "The Fourth Republic of the League of Conservative Nations" is a Parliamentary Republican Democracy, with a system that was designed as unique to itself. We are neither conservative nor liberal in our system's crafting, as we are an independent and free society."
Your Name specifically states you are conservative.
"The League of Conservative Nations recruitment initiatives in recent time has been sent in stamp used TGs to either newly founded nations or recently founded nations. We have not engaged in recruitments to destabilize regions, and we have actually received several reports from our citizens that your region has done so towards our citizens."
"Your region has recruited from non-recruiter friendly regions, and your attempts to destabilize the UCN are very clear through your infiltrations and espionage.
The LCN has no wish to engage in conflict with your region, however, your region has repeatedly made us the target of propaganda (like this document itself) and recruitment attempts towards our members."
This document is not propaganda. Your put down of other political opinions and tyrannical methods of recruitment have depleted countless regions and made them vulnerable to attack. Your attempt to troll our rmb previosly have also destablilized ours along with other Governments.

User avatar
Quebecshire
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1911
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby Quebecshire » Tue Jun 05, 2018 1:01 pm

Crimsonfield wrote:
Quebecshire wrote:Hello, everyone reading this thread, as an LCN official I feel I should respectfully common on this document, point by point.


PROPOSAL A

Noting the League of Conservative nations calls itself a conservative democracy, dedicated at preserving conservatism in NS. - The LCN, officially, "The Fourth Republic of the League of Conservative Nations" is a Parliamentary Republican Democracy, with a system that was designed as unique to itself. We are neither conservative nor liberal in our system's crafting, as we are an independent and free society.

Understanding the countless regions that have fallen due to League of Conservative nations intrusion causing instability for the sake of there own recruiting program. - The League of Conservative Nations recruitment initiatives in recent time has been sent in stamp used TGs to either newly founded nations or recently founded nations. We have not engaged in recruitments to destabilize regions, and we have actually received several reports from our citizens that your region has done so towards our citizens.

Accepting that fact that the League of Conservative has prevented stability, security, and peace in the United Conservative Nations. Attempting to bring about the regions demise as a new conservative power. - The LCN has no wish to engage in conflict with your region, however, your region has repeatedly made us the target of propaganda (like this document itself) and recruitment attempts towards our members.

PROPOSAL B

Observing [region=The League Of Conservative Nations] hunger for power and destruction, - I mean, without fact, example, this is purely propaganda.

Denouncing the LCN's recent threats to invade new regions, for example the U.C.N, - No officially sanctioned threat by an LCN official to "invade" the UCN has been made.

Believing this string of threats of invasions and infiltration must be put to an end, - I further note the lack of examples and proof.

Stating that a condemnation would send a message to other anti-democratic warmongering regions, - The LCN has a democratic system in which the people elect representatives to form a government led by a Prime Minister, the LCN has made no declarations of war in the formal sense in the times following the CLA crisis of late 2016 and early 2017.

Further Clarifying the LCN claims to be a Democratic Region, yet it has an executive branch made of oppressive "Consuls" appointed by the Leader, - The LCN does not have a "Leader" to appoint Consuls. The only order issued by the Consulate was one which was reviewed by the Assembly and a poll was held on the topic (the result of the aforementioned public poll was followed by the Consulate). If you have any questions to Consulate cycles or functionality feel free to contact me or another LCN official.



Thank you for your time if you have read this, and any questions or comments I am happy to answer.

Proposal A
"The LCN, officially, "The Fourth Republic of the League of Conservative Nations" is a Parliamentary Republican Democracy, with a system that was designed as unique to itself. We are neither conservative nor liberal in our system's crafting, as we are an independent and free society."
Your Name specifically states you are conservative.
"The League of Conservative Nations recruitment initiatives in recent time has been sent in stamp used TGs to either newly founded nations or recently founded nations. We have not engaged in recruitments to destabilize regions, and we have actually received several reports from our citizens that your region has done so towards our citizens."
"Your region has recruited from non-recruiter friendly regions, and your attempts to destabilize the UCN are very clear through your infiltrations and espionage.
The LCN has no wish to engage in conflict with your region, however, your region has repeatedly made us the target of propaganda (like this document itself) and recruitment attempts towards our members."
This document is not propaganda. Your put down of other political opinions and tyrannical methods of recruitment have depleted countless regions and made them vulnerable to attack. Your attempt to troll our rmb previosly have also destablilized ours along with other Governments.

The League of Conservative Nations is an independent region, a name cannot be changed, our region is not conservative, liberal, or otherwise. It is a region with a democratic system that has several represented parties and belief systems in its population. You sir, still cite ZERO examples from what you claim is a countless list, so I await some real commentary from yourself.
PATRIOT OF THE LEAGUE REDEEMER OF CONCORD
Defender Moralist | Consul of the LDF | Warden-Lieutenant Emeritus | Commended
Benevolent Thomas wrote:I founded a defender organization out of my dislike of invaders, what invading represents, and my desire to see them suffer.
Pergamon wrote:I must say, you are truly what they deserve.

User avatar
Terra Voltera
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 101
Founded: Sep 04, 2017
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Terra Voltera » Tue Jun 05, 2018 1:11 pm

I also await proof to your allegations. From the looks of things it seems you're just trying to levy a grudge against a region you don't like, which is not what the SC is for.
Founder of The Hole To Hide In (THTHI Discord)
Former three time Delegate of 10000 Islands

I've been commended by the Security Council. Author of 17 Security Council Resolutions.

User avatar
Kaboomlandia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7395
Founded: May 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kaboomlandia » Tue Jun 05, 2018 2:37 pm

This doesn't look like a matter for the SC.
In=character, Kaboomlandia is a World Assembly member and abides by its resolutions. If this nation isn't in the WA, it's for practical reasons.
Author of GA #371 and SC #208, #214, #226, #227, #230, #232
Co-Author of SC #204
"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result."
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

"Your legitimacy, Kaboom, has melted away in my eyes. I couldn't have believed that only a shadow of your once brilliant WA career remains."

User avatar
Crimsonfield
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Feb 26, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Crimsonfield » Tue Jun 05, 2018 10:59 pm

Terra Voltera wrote:I also await proof to your allegations. From the looks of things it seems you're just trying to levy a grudge against a region you don't like, which is not what the SC is for.

The proposal is put on hold for now until we can provide evidence. No more posts here guys!

User avatar
Eminople
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Jan 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Eminople » Wed Jun 06, 2018 7:50 pm

Crimsonfield wrote:
Terra Voltera wrote:I also await proof to your allegations. From the looks of things it seems you're just trying to levy a grudge against a region you don't like, which is not what the SC is for.

The proposal is put on hold for now until we can provide evidence. No more posts here guys!

Still waiting for you to provide evidence

User avatar
The Noble Thatcherites
Diplomat
 
Posts: 549
Founded: Dec 03, 2015
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Noble Thatcherites » Wed Jun 06, 2018 9:36 pm

Eminople wrote:
Crimsonfield wrote:The proposal is put on hold for now until we can provide evidence. No more posts here guys!

Still waiting for you to provide evidence
Breaking News: There is no evidence.
—Thatcher Whitehall
Kanglia wrote:Thatcher. Wants. As. Little. To. Do. With. You. All. As. Possible.
Résumé
The Union of Democratic States
Citizen and Founder
Prime Minister (x1)
Motion(s) Passed (x15)
Ambassador (x21)
Publisher for The Union Post (x5)
Constitutional Framer (x4)
The Free Nations Region
Citizen and Legislator
Justice (x1)
Motion(s) Passed (1x)
The Allied States
Citizen
Senator (x1)
FORGE
Representative (x4)
Chancellor (x1)
ITDA
Founder
Representative (x1)
Secretary General (x1)
Charter Author (x2)
Court of International Law and Justice
Foreign Affairs Justice (x1)
Europeia
Citizen and Assemblyman (x1)
The South Pacific
Citizen
SPSF Recruit (x1)


The Union of Democratic States

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12655
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Thu Jun 07, 2018 12:25 am

I guess on hold is something of a subjective term, since this was 'On hold' for all of 14 hours before it was submitted at 15.15:20, 6 June. https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_vi ... 1528312520

I'm not voting for it. Use of bolding and italics offends my aesthetic sensibilities.
Last edited by Imperium Anglorum on Thu Jun 07, 2018 12:26 am, edited 1 time in total.

Author: 1 SC and 56+ GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
GenSec (24 Dec 2021 –); posts not official unless so indicated
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Twice-commended toxic villainous globalist kittehs

User avatar
United Republic Empire
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 398
Founded: Jul 27, 2014
Left-Leaning College State

Postby United Republic Empire » Thu Jun 07, 2018 2:14 am

I am not voting for this either - No evidence has been provided for what the author claims as countless. Surely there would be mounds of evidence if this was the case, but this seems more like a petty grudge in my opinion.
Separatist Peoples
OOC: Well, the GA is full of obstructionist elite, and the rules are just there to hold the OP back. Haven't you heard?

User avatar
Agereus
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Mar 01, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Agereus » Thu Jun 07, 2018 3:15 am

I can confirm that the line "Further Clarifying recently one of the consuls, Quebecshire, modified a regional party due to it being against the Consulate" is blatantly untrue. It is talking about my party dispatch in which it openly stated an opposition to the consulate. However this dispatch was a WIP and the statements on it were more my own opinions rather than my party's platform. Also the dispatch was quite unpleasant looking as well. So I redesigned the dispatch and it did not contain an proper opinion on the Consulate, but did still have a policy of igniting a debate on the status of the Consulate. Quebecshire never forced me to make any changes to my dispatch and all were made on my own account.

User avatar
Isvataan
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 114
Founded: Mar 09, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Isvataan » Thu Jun 07, 2018 5:05 am

Ugh another sjw neo condemnation and, of course, no evidence

Against
Last edited by Isvataan on Thu Jun 07, 2018 11:29 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Terra Voltera
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 101
Founded: Sep 04, 2017
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Terra Voltera » Thu Jun 07, 2018 7:26 am

Isvataan wrote:Ugh another sjw neo liberation and, of course, no evidence (like what happened to Kasier except that one passed unfortunately)

Against

Erm, this isn't a liberation. Its a condemnation, which is totally different. Might as well post that the author has no support from me, due to blatant lies appearing.
Founder of The Hole To Hide In (THTHI Discord)
Former three time Delegate of 10000 Islands

I've been commended by the Security Council. Author of 17 Security Council Resolutions.

User avatar
Alkasia
Envoy
 
Posts: 281
Founded: Sep 24, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Alkasia » Thu Jun 07, 2018 12:17 pm

Formatting is less than ideal, and the proposal lacks any sort of evidence to the claims it makes. Not even examples, of the "trolling" and "invasions" which really are key in these resolutions.

Furthermore I do feel that that the condemnation lacks a defined point. It's rather all over the place. First it mentions the apparent threats, trolling, and invasions that are happening and then goes off into a tangent about a government official modifying a party. If you're going to bring up multiple separate points, they need to be better defined and organized for cohesiveness.
Former Delegate of XKI, current Reject with a penchant for murder.
Defender Romeo
Democratic Socialist
Koth wrote:Alk resembles some sort of slime mold that asexually reproduces scum, as is standard for XKI natives
Cormactopia Prime wrote:You're silly. I miss the XKI veterans who knew how to appropriately deal with raiders.
Kanglia wrote:Can confirm lynching Alk is the most satisfying thing. :p
Sarakart wrote:What a time to be alive. Welcome to the legislative revolution, the liberation wars have begun.

In reference to XKI's Embassy thread:
Benevolent Thomas wrote:"Something you thought you'd never see for $3000, Alex."

User avatar
Malphe
Diplomat
 
Posts: 726
Founded: Jun 02, 2016
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Malphe » Fri Jun 08, 2018 7:50 am

Alkasia wrote:Furthermore I do feel that that the condemnation lacks a defined point. It's rather all over the place. First it mentions the apparent threats, trolling, and invasions that are happening and then goes off into a tangent about a government official modifying a party. If you're going to bring up multiple separate points, they need to be better defined and organized for cohesiveness.

That's probably because the author is grasping at straws. Looks like the objective of this proposal is to slap a condemn on the LCN because the author doesn't like it, despite there not really being any need for a condemn.
Malphe Vytherov

User avatar
Benevolent Thomas
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1483
Founded: Jun 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Benevolent Thomas » Fri Jun 08, 2018 3:01 pm

The fact that this trash has so many approvals is astonishing.

Fort Triumph will be voting AGAINST this proposal.
Ballotonia wrote:Personally, I think there's something seriously wrong with a game if it willfully allows the destruction of longtime player communities in favor of kids whose sole purpose is to enjoy ruining the game for others.

User avatar
Spode Humbled Minions
Envoy
 
Posts: 252
Founded: May 13, 2016
New York Times Democracy

Postby Spode Humbled Minions » Fri Jun 08, 2018 4:02 pm

We have not threatened to invade you. You have yet to provide any evidence whatsoever. Your own discord shows that this is a bad faith attempt to fool socialists into joining a hate train on the LCN. https://discordapp.com/invite/Y9ksyZu

And to top it off, you knew you had such a bad case as to go out of your way to boost your delegate support by having a your founder have their WA account in an entirely different region to get a cheap extra support piece. Yes we know that your account Nagarno, is also Great Berlinn
"Sadly we do not have seven plagues to soften your hardened heart"
“Your existing state of mind is at caress to apocalypse.”

User avatar
Calamari
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 18
Founded: May 17, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Calamari » Fri Jun 08, 2018 4:04 pm

It is fair to point out that this condemnation has been posted days after the founder of the UCN (the region Crimsonfield resides in) New Nagarno (puppet of Nagarno) was found guilty of recruiting outside the region for his political party (which violates the rules of the LCN.)

This condemnation is a blatant vendetta, where the UCN is trying to use the WA to attack a region it has a grudge against. This is against the point of the WA and SC and should be solved without the leverage of the WA.

It is akin to tattling in pre-school. However, the LCN is guilty of none of these accusations, and the lack of proof in any of these accusations aludes to that.

I stand against this, not only as a member of the LCN, but also as a person who cares for the integrity of the WA.
Last edited by Calamari on Fri Jun 08, 2018 4:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Hessere
Attaché
 
Posts: 93
Founded: Oct 14, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Hessere » Fri Jun 08, 2018 5:36 pm

Oh boy, let's see what this is.

You know what, There needs to be a way to spread awareness to the people supporting random, oft-poorly written proposals because someone told them so, to stop supporting random, oft-poorly written proposals because someone told them so :eyebrow:

EDIT: You don't just simply draft and submit a proposal to condemn someone because wild accusations.
Resolve this elsewhere, preferably not in the WA.
Last edited by Hessere on Fri Jun 08, 2018 5:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I bet you'll love NS gameplay.
Moral Defending is DISGUSTANG
Semi-active SC Forums ranter
You should watch me come to terms with myself at the eventual heat death of the universe

User avatar
Comlogical
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 18
Founded: Jun 02, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Comlogical » Fri Jun 08, 2018 10:45 pm

How did this complete trash get into quorum without evidences, or whatever provable by the submitee? This is something that I can remember of from the attempted "Condemn the Communist Bloc". Ordinary SJW/far-right tactics.
Also GG to the delegates who approved this crapola.

Against.
Comlogical (genpasaporte#4975)

Minister of Defense of the Union of Democratic States | UDSAF Commander | RP Mediator of the UDS RP Ministry | Citizen of the South Pacific
Anything I say does not represent the views of the UDS as a whole.

User avatar
The Wallenburgian World Assembly Offices
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 53
Founded: Aug 24, 2017
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Wallenburgian World Assembly Offices » Fri Jun 08, 2018 11:00 pm

Comlogical wrote:How did this complete trash get into quorum without evidences, or whatever provable by the submitee? This is something that I can remember of from the attempted "Condemn the Communist Bloc". Ordinary SJW/far-right tactics.
Also GG to the delegates who approved this crapola.

Against.

It got to vote because the author bothered to run a TG campaign for it.

Against. The SC is not meant to attack regions you so happen to dislike.
If you're seeing this post, I probably meant to post it as Wallenburg.

User avatar
Liberis Civitatibus
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 15
Founded: Mar 05, 2018
Ex-Nation

What Balogna

Postby Liberis Civitatibus » Fri Jun 08, 2018 11:14 pm

This is basically the NS example of Muslim nations calling Israel a bunch of Nazis (telegram me for a discussion, as I don't plan on returning to this forum).

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to WA Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads