[SUBMITTED]Condemn La Navasse

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.
User avatar
Democratic Empire of Romania
Posts: 70
Founded: Apr 03, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

[SUBMITTED]Condemn La Navasse

Postby Democratic Empire of Romania » Sat Mar 31, 2018 10:31 pm

Upon the following arguments:

THE REPEATED USE of liberations, self-styled as 'neo-liberations', against regions considered 'Fascist'. However, these liberations are used with no sense.

SHOCKED by the final votes in thse resolutions. Revealing that a large part of players aren't agreeing with them.

CONSIDERING that the trust in the Security Council hit a record-low following these resolutions.

NOTING that they became a political too, neither a resolution to 'stripe away Delegate-imposed barriers to free entry in a region'.

WISHING to stop this trend of 'neo-liberations'

The Security Council, through this resolution, CONDEMNS LA NAVASSE
Salutare tuturor Românilor de pe NationStates !

User avatar
Posts: 1575
Founded: Mar 21, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby Arkeyana » Sat Mar 31, 2018 10:33 pm


'bout time someone's made this.
Embrace the Singularity

Its a wonderful Pain


User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
Posts: 7822
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Sun Apr 01, 2018 1:00 am

I'm opposed to proposals attempting to give badges to spammers. However that is, it does not favours to the proposal that it was submitted without any review.

Author: 1 SC and 21 GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and Regional Records
Delegate for Europe
Out-of-character unless marked otherwise
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate

User avatar
Posts: 2235
Founded: Apr 12, 2016
New York Times Democracy

Postby Aclion » Sun Apr 01, 2018 1:07 am

There's a better draft here.

User avatar
Posts: 143
Founded: Jun 20, 2017
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Paxiosolange » Sun Apr 01, 2018 1:08 am

Gospel Power wrote:Ohhh, having lovers without marriage is abomination in my opinion, but all your other laws are true, Gospel power approves

User avatar
Posts: 24
Founded: Mar 23, 2015
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Kokoku » Sun Apr 01, 2018 2:20 am

It’s unfortunate that commendations and condemnations have no effect on gameplay.

Nevertheless, I support.
Last edited by Kokoku on Sun Apr 01, 2018 2:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
World Assembly Delegate of the New Warsaw Pact

User avatar
Posts: 3996
Founded: Oct 05, 2016

Postby Tinhampton » Sun Apr 01, 2018 3:46 am

Democratic Empire of Romania wrote:CONSIDERING that the trust in the Security Council hit a record-low following these resolutions.

Nope. That would probably be July 2010, when Condemn Der Fuhrer Dyszel (which contained exactly the same words as the author's later SC#31) was defeated, sheerly out of protest (by the once-mighty Three-Walled Bar) of the recent introduction of Rule 4.
Challenge me | TG me
British $LFD, unaffiliated defender
+161 posts by Finlarvat
Card #1,716,378
Tests: PolComp, 8values, PolitiScales
Brexit... doesn't mean Brexit, sadly.
Posts of Win:
[REDACTED] | "EVIL CARROTS" | Saint Josephtan
Modly truths | Sweet chaos | COCANEFA chants
Unibot on Canterlot & Francoism | Fenda tools
A timely reminder:
Frisbeeteria wrote:Gameplay is about NationStates gameplay,
not gambling on the World Cup.
The Self-Administrative City of Tinhampton Proudly Urban, Unashamedly Rural Factbooks What I've done Reference
Mayor: John Price (UCP; centre-right). Delegate-Ambassador to the WA: Alexander Smith (NatSov). Assistant: Jamie Williamson (IntFed).
Regions I've WADdled for: Federation of Fictitious States ~~ Union of Liberal Nations ~~ Venelvis ~~ Warzone Asia
WA authorship: SC#250, SC#251

User avatar
Posts: 2686
Founded: Apr 10, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby Consular » Sun Apr 01, 2018 4:20 am

There are already two other condemn La Nav drafts on this page. What the fuck guys

User avatar
Eiron V Fluffykins
Civil Servant
Posts: 6
Founded: Feb 10, 2018

Postby Eiron V Fluffykins » Mon Apr 16, 2018 7:41 pm

the title says submitted but i can't see it in the list of proposals... was it actually submitted?

User avatar
Posts: 7192
Founded: May 22, 2013
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Kaboomlandia » Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:27 pm

It was submitted two weeks ago and would have either timed out or been declared illegal by the mods a long time ago.
In=character, Kaboomlandia is a World Assembly member and abides by its resolutions. If this nation isn't in the WA, it's for practical reasons.
Author of GA #371 and SC #208, #214, #226, #227, #230, #232
Co-Author of SC #204
"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result."
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

"Your legitimacy, Kaboom, has melted away in my eyes. I couldn't have believed that only a shadow of your once brilliant WA career remains."

User avatar
Senior Forum Moderator
Posts: 5292
Founded: Antiquity
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wrapper » Tue Apr 17, 2018 5:52 am

If it was submitted it would have been marked as illegal under R4(b) ("players").

User avatar
Posts: 36
Founded: Mar 09, 2017
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Isvataan » Fri Apr 20, 2018 6:27 am

Dang, I was hoping the condemnation go through

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Jar Wattinree

Remove ads