[Draft] Liberate USSD

[Kaboomlandia]

Reading through the first page of this thread, the general tone of the replies is “lol”. None of the replies in this thread express any form of interest in actually attacking this region militarily, likely because they are sensible and realize that it has a very low benefit/cost ratio.

Attero isn’t popular, but I think you’re overestimating the level of animosity against USSD.

[Jocospor]

This proposal is by no means an attack on leftist regions.

Oh, absolutely not. We couldn't have that at all. Big no-no. Completely out of the question, period.

[La Navasse]

Reading through the first page of this thread, the general tone of the replies is “lol”. None of the replies in this thread express any form of interest in actually attacking this region militarily, likely because they are sensible and realize that it has a very low benefit/cost ratio.

Attero isn’t popular, but I think you’re overestimating the level of animosity against USSD.

The general tone of replies in the thread's first page isn't "lol," but more of a general understanding of "we should move this forward," sprinkled with some dissenters who simply dislike the concept of an offensive liberation on the whole.

I still think that the level of animosity against Attero and USSD as a whole is enough to potentially warrant a military attack on the region in the event that Attero CTEs or is DEATed. I believe that you're underestimating the animosity, actually.

[Kavagrad]

Despite having what is now a less-than-cordial relationship with Attero/Vetelo, I'm opposed. Not really in favour of Offensive Liberations that seem largely based on the structure of government in the regions, especially with regimes far more dictatorial than USSD. I can't see this reaching quorum.