NATION

PASSWORD

[Draft] Liberate USSD

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Alkasia
Envoy
 
Posts: 277
Founded: Sep 24, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Alkasia » Thu Mar 29, 2018 6:51 am

La Navasse wrote:The proposal Liberate USSD shall be put on hold due to voter fatigue

Can this be applied to the rest of your liberations too? :p
Former Delegate of XKI, current Reject with a penchant for murder.
Defender Romeo
Social Democrat/Left Libertarian
Koth wrote:Alk resembles some sort of slime mold that asexually reproduces scum, as is standard for XKI natives
Cormactopia Prime wrote:You're silly. I miss the XKI veterans who knew how to appropriately deal with raiders.
Kanglia wrote:Can confirm lynching Alk is the most satisfying thing. :p
Sarakart wrote:What a time to be alive. Welcome to the legislative revolution, the liberation wars have begun.

In reference to XKI's Embassy thread:
Benevolent Thomas wrote:"Something you thought you'd never see for $3000, Alex."

User avatar
Grossdeutsche Demokratische Republik
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Mar 29, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Grossdeutsche Demokratische Republik » Fri Mar 30, 2018 1:58 pm

Why would you want to 'liberate' us anyway? We've done nothing but have our own ideology, and you want to get us liberated?

User avatar
North Saitama
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 167
Founded: Jul 04, 2017
Anarchy

Postby North Saitama » Fri Mar 30, 2018 2:24 pm

It should be scrapped entirely, rather than just put on hold. These liberations are out of control, and need to stop. Using ideology as an excuse to violate the sovereignty of regions and the right to practice the ideology they see fit is unjust, and abusive of the purpose of liberations.
North Saitama Overview Current Year: 1988
Pro: Capitalism, Individual Liberty, Leeks
Anti: Socialism, Communism, Authoritarianism

Japan Regional Discord

User avatar
La Navasse
Diplomat
 
Posts: 513
Founded: Mar 06, 2016
Father Knows Best State

Shelving of the Proposal

Postby La Navasse » Tue Apr 17, 2018 12:02 am

USSD is a widely-blacklisted region across NationStates, and has many repulsive qualities. However, I find no reason to essentially bring attention to a region that isn't exactly deserving of any Neoliberation, or indeed any sort of recognition for its atrocious acts, especially in light of its invasion of The Monarchist Entente. Therefore, I have Shelved this proposal and will end any support or campaign for this draft.
A Proud Francoist Feederite.
Discord: Lanav#0940 | FCN delenda est.
Author of 4 SC Resolutions. | GP Alignment: 2, 19 | Clarification on My Aliases.

User avatar
Indo-Malaysia
Minister
 
Posts: 2284
Founded: Nov 07, 2014
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Indo-Malaysia » Tue Apr 17, 2018 3:44 pm

La Navasse wrote:USSD is a widely-blacklisted region across NationStates, and has many repulsive qualities. However, I find no reason to essentially bring attention to a region that isn't exactly deserving of any Neoliberation, or indeed any sort of recognition for its atrocious acts, especially in light of its invasion of The Monarchist Entente. Therefore, I have Shelved this proposal and will end any support or campaign for this draft.

That didn't stop you with Nazi Europa though did it?
Pro: Socialism, Nationalism, Equality, LGB, True Feminism, United Ireland, Independent Scotland

Anti: Historical Revisionism, Neofascism, Capitalism, Conservative Party, Ulster

User avatar
Isvataan
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 105
Founded: Mar 09, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Isvataan » Fri Apr 20, 2018 6:34 am

Indo-Malaysia wrote:
La Navasse wrote:USSD is a widely-blacklisted region across NationStates, and has many repulsive qualities. However, I find no reason to essentially bring attention to a region that isn't exactly deserving of any Neoliberation, or indeed any sort of recognition for its atrocious acts, especially in light of its invasion of The Monarchist Entente. Therefore, I have Shelved this proposal and will end any support or campaign for this draft.

That didn't stop you with Nazi Europa though did it?


#VeryTrue

User avatar
La Navasse
Diplomat
 
Posts: 513
Founded: Mar 06, 2016
Father Knows Best State

Reviving Liberate USSD

Postby La Navasse » Fri Nov 30, 2018 9:02 pm

La Navasse wrote:USSD is a widely-blacklisted region across NationStates, and has many repulsive qualities. However, I find no reason to essentially bring attention to a region that isn't exactly deserving of any Neoliberation, or indeed any sort of recognition for its atrocious acts, especially in light of its invasion of The Monarchist Entente. Therefore, I have Shelved this proposal and will end any support or campaign for this draft.

I have decided to Revive this proposal and continue drafting Liberate USSD, along with other potential proposals. Feel free to provide constructive criticism to the proposal or the other concept proposals.
A Proud Francoist Feederite.
Discord: Lanav#0940 | FCN delenda est.
Author of 4 SC Resolutions. | GP Alignment: 2, 19 | Clarification on My Aliases.

User avatar
Kuriko
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 484
Founded: Oct 31, 2017
New York Times Democracy

Postby Kuriko » Fri Nov 30, 2018 9:28 pm

Here we go again :roll:
Delegate of the 10000 Islands
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
Citizen of the 10000 Islands and The Rejected Realms


Former TITO Tactical Officer
Former Commander of TGW, UDSAF, and FORGE
Proud founder of The Hole To Hide In
Person behind the Regional Officer resignation button
Person behind the Offsite Chat tag and the Jump Point tag
WA Character limit increase to 5,000 characters

User avatar
La Navasse
Diplomat
 
Posts: 513
Founded: Mar 06, 2016
Father Knows Best State

Postby La Navasse » Fri Nov 30, 2018 9:37 pm

Kuriko wrote:Here we go again :roll:

At least you could provide some constructive criticism.
A Proud Francoist Feederite.
Discord: Lanav#0940 | FCN delenda est.
Author of 4 SC Resolutions. | GP Alignment: 2, 19 | Clarification on My Aliases.

User avatar
New Bremerton
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 124
Founded: Jul 20, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby New Bremerton » Fri Nov 30, 2018 10:37 pm

For the liberation of USSD, for the same reason I'm for the liberation of CCD. Also for the liberation of Amestris for derailing Repeal Preventing the Execution of Innocents the first time it was submitted. Raiding simply for the sake of raiding should absolutely be condemned. Never heard of Farkasfalka. My RL interventionist outlook informs my aggressive position on liberations. Authoritarianism and illiberalism are on the rise, and "interfering in our internal affairs" is a line frequently trotted out by authoritarian regimes IRL, giving them carte blanche to murder their own people with impunity, and I'm sick of it. I also have a personal vendetta against authoritarianism, having lived under its thumb for many years.

Such regimes are not worthy of having their sovereignty respected and ideally should be utterly destroyed if possible. Unfortunately, RL has its share of unintended consequences, and we can't simply invade and destroy all of these regimes IRL, but we CAN do so to ideologically similar regions in NS with minimal repercussions. We mustn't allow them to fester and grow. We must nip them all in the bud before they even have a chance to destroy us all.
Last edited by New Bremerton on Fri Nov 30, 2018 10:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Holy Republic of New Bremerton
Region: The North Pacific
General Assembly: IC
Security Council: OOC

"Liberi Fatali"

This nation does not use NSStats.

User avatar
Kaboomlandia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7281
Founded: May 22, 2013
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Kaboomlandia » Sat Dec 01, 2018 11:58 pm

How about we don’t try this again, considering nobody supported this idea the last time? It hasn’t exactly gotten more popular.
In=character, Kaboomlandia is a World Assembly member and abides by its resolutions. If this nation isn't in the WA, it's for practical reasons.
Author of GA #371 and SC #208, #214, #226, #227, #230, #232
Co-Author of SC #204
"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result."
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

"Your legitimacy, Kaboom, has melted away in my eyes. I couldn't have believed that only a shadow of your once brilliant WA career remains."

User avatar
Marilyn Manson Freaks
Diplomat
 
Posts: 638
Founded: Jul 05, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Marilyn Manson Freaks » Sun Dec 02, 2018 7:19 am

I'm against all of these.
Hi, I'm Manson! I'm just your friendly neighborhood rockstar!
NS Join Date: November 6th, 2015

Here are some things I've authored.

Jobs & Positions
4th Generation Fishmonger
Founder of the Church of Zyonn
NRO Stooge

User avatar
La Navasse
Diplomat
 
Posts: 513
Founded: Mar 06, 2016
Father Knows Best State

A Response

Postby La Navasse » Mon Dec 03, 2018 12:48 am

New Bremerton wrote:For the liberation of USSD, for the same reason I'm for the liberation of CCD. Also for the liberation of Amestris for derailing Repeal Preventing the Execution of Innocents the first time it was submitted. Raiding simply for the sake of raiding should absolutely be condemned. Never heard of Farkasfalka. My RL interventionist outlook informs my aggressive position on liberations. Authoritarianism and illiberalism are on the rise, and "interfering in our internal affairs" is a line frequently trotted out by authoritarian regimes IRL, giving them carte blanche to murder their own people with impunity, and I'm sick of it. I also have a personal vendetta against authoritarianism, having lived under its thumb for many years.

Such regimes are not worthy of having their sovereignty respected and ideally should be utterly destroyed if possible. Unfortunately, RL has its share of unintended consequences, and we can't simply invade and destroy all of these regimes IRL, but we CAN do so to ideologically similar regions in NS with minimal repercussions. We mustn't allow them to fester and grow. We must nip them all in the bud before they even have a chance to destroy us all.

Thank you for your supportive opinion. I must note that the liberation does not liberate USSD or Amestris on the basis of their raiding, nor of their authoritarianism - both are fine when done efficiently for the region and with a healthy OOC attitude, both traits that USSD and Amestris do not have. USSD and Amestris are both blacklisted communities, the former due to both its founder Vetelo and its nepotistic regime Vetelo has built around himself, and the latter due to its founder King Bradley being blacklisted for a variety of reasons, which include backstabbing, leaks, manipulation, and illegal data collection while under the alias 94 Block. Both Vetelo and King Bradley have done ghastly actions in the past, which statistically speaking, they will repeat, and as they appear to be doing nothing more then carrying on what they've done before and training a new generation of GPers that are also likely be blacklisted, it is pertinent that they be immediately reprimanded for they actions via offensive liberations that will hopefully cause them to either change course or hold their regions vulnerable in the case of their nations disappearing, opening their respective regions for invasion.

Farkafalka is the direct successor to The Iron Order, an infamous medium sized fascist region with reported Nazi tendencies, cloaked under a sham "decreeist" government. Although the region itself does not have much history, its predecessor has, and when I was previously on my anti-fascist drafting spree, they appeared to change regions to avoid an offensive liberation. I think there's potentially sufficient evidence to offensively liberate under the actions the region has done as The Iron Order, but I am currently listening for further discussion to determine whether the concept is plausible.

Kaboomlandia wrote:How about we don’t try this again, considering nobody supported this idea the last time? It hasn’t exactly gotten more popular.

The failure of my last submitted proposal, Liberate Arcem, is not reflective of the failure of the concept of offensive liberations. In fact, Lord Dominator's passage of Liberate Confederation of Corrupt Dictators shows otherwise; the offensive liberation is alive and thriving. Although Liberate Federation of Conservative Nations and Liberate The Coalition of Fascist Nations have been defeated at vote, I believe that the former failed due to the relative inexperience of the author, their illegal methods, insufficient communication with GCR delegates, and the lack of blacklist upon the region accompanied with a lack of negative publicity. The latter failed due to a lack of active recruitment, a lack of revisionist foreign policy, and general irrelevancy of The Coalition. I am confident that I can overcome these obstacles with Liberate USSD and Liberate Amestris, and I am currently pondering over whether this is also true for Farkasfalka.
A Proud Francoist Feederite.
Discord: Lanav#0940 | FCN delenda est.
Author of 4 SC Resolutions. | GP Alignment: 2, 19 | Clarification on My Aliases.

User avatar
Devi
Secretary
 
Posts: 33
Founded: Nov 09, 2018
Anarchy

Postby Devi » Mon Dec 03, 2018 10:24 am

You realise that your being the author of these resolutions probably isn't going to help their chances, regardless of what merit they may or may not have, right?
Devi 2: Electric Boogaloo

NPO delenda est.

User avatar
Jar Wattinree
Diplomat
 
Posts: 844
Founded: Dec 14, 2016
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Jar Wattinree » Mon Dec 03, 2018 11:19 am

La Navasse wrote:Farkafalka is the direct successor to The Iron Order, an infamous medium sized fascist region with reported Nazi tendencies, cloaked under a sham "decreeist" government. Although the region itself does not have much history, its predecessor has, and when I was previously on my anti-fascist drafting spree, they appeared to change regions to avoid an offensive liberation. I think there's potentially sufficient evidence to offensively liberate under the actions the region has done as The Iron Order, but I am currently listening for further discussion to determine whether the concept is plausible.

The Iron Confederacy is TIO's new successor state.
Tribune of the New Pacific Order

  • Governor of Province Ardere
  • Praetorian of the New Pacific Order

User avatar
Kaboomlandia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7281
Founded: May 22, 2013
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Kaboomlandia » Mon Dec 03, 2018 8:33 pm

The pre-emptive liberation against CCD isn't "thriving" no matter how much you try and spin it. Not only has absolutely no action been taken against the region since then, but I cannot foresee any action ever coming. The second-place nation in endorsements has 120, which is pretty much out of the realm of possibility. A liberation is just not practical in this circumstance, with an active founder and a strong backup plan.

Also, I wonder how many delegates have you blocked from last time?
Last edited by Kaboomlandia on Mon Dec 03, 2018 8:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
In=character, Kaboomlandia is a World Assembly member and abides by its resolutions. If this nation isn't in the WA, it's for practical reasons.
Author of GA #371 and SC #208, #214, #226, #227, #230, #232
Co-Author of SC #204
"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result."
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

"Your legitimacy, Kaboom, has melted away in my eyes. I couldn't have believed that only a shadow of your once brilliant WA career remains."

User avatar
Lord Dominator
Senator
 
Posts: 3598
Founded: Dec 22, 2016
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Lord Dominator » Mon Dec 03, 2018 8:45 pm

Kaboomlandia wrote:Also, I wonder how many delegates have you blocked from last time?

:rofl:
Osiris Vizier of WA AffairsDee Vytherov-SkollvaldrGameplay Ambassador of ForestThe Black Hawks LieutenantRecruitment and Outreach Director of Lazarus

User avatar
Vetelo
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 185
Founded: Mar 28, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Vetelo » Wed Dec 05, 2018 5:39 pm

I think if you're going to try this again, then you should probably take the criticisms received when you first made this thread and apply them. The USSD does not have any one ideology, and "Stalinist" in no way describes how our region operates. A part of our government is directly elected and transparent, I wouldn't really call that "Stalinist". So maybe go think of some actual reasons to liberate us. Not that I expect this resolution to ever pass, but it's a minor nuisance to our region at best anyways. We only password during Z-Day. I'm not quitting this game anytime soon, and if I do, I will hand my founder nation over to someone who I trust.
USSD Founder
USSF Fleet Admiral
Coalition of Sovereign Nations Citizen
Travelling Region Member
Former Positions

Attero of Vetelo

The joy, let me burn,
in the kingdom of flesh!

User avatar
La Navasse
Diplomat
 
Posts: 513
Founded: Mar 06, 2016
Father Knows Best State

An Update & Responses II

Postby La Navasse » Thu Dec 06, 2018 5:25 pm

It has been determined that an offensive Liberate Amestris proposal is not required nor necessary at this time, primarily to its interregional irrelevance and fragile argument for offensive action. A plausible offensive liberation against Farkasfalka is still being thoroughly evaluated, and a separate offensive liberation draft against the Federation of Conservative Nations should be created shortly.

Devi wrote:You realise that your being the author of these resolutions probably isn't going to help their chances, regardless of what merit they may or may not have, right?
I understand that I've had a reputation of pushing through multiple offensive Liberations at a time; however, this time around I intend to space them out by passing a General Assembly proposal between each offensive Liberation to reduce potential voter apathy. The Cloning Conventions will be my first post-retirement proposal to be submitted, after which would be Liberate USSD.

Jar Wattinree wrote:
La Navasse wrote:Farkafalka is the direct successor to The Iron Order, an infamous medium sized fascist region with reported Nazi tendencies, cloaked under a sham "decreeist" government. Although the region itself does not have much history, its predecessor has, and when I was previously on my anti-fascist drafting spree, they appeared to change regions to avoid an offensive liberation. I think there's potentially sufficient evidence to offensively liberate under the actions the region has done as The Iron Order, but I am currently listening for further discussion to determine whether the concept is plausible.

The Iron Confederacy is TIO's new successor state.
The Iron Confederacy is actually a separatist movement from Farkasfalka, which is inspired by The Iron Order before it was merged into Farkasfalka. Although The Iron Confederacy could be considered as TIO's present incarnation, I would prefer to Liberate Farkasfalka.

Kaboomlandia wrote:The pre-emptive liberation against CCD isn't "thriving" no matter how much you try and spin it. Not only has absolutely no action been taken against the region since then, but I cannot foresee any action ever coming. The second-place nation in endorsements has 120, which is pretty much out of the realm of possibility. A liberation is just not practical in this circumstance, with an active founder and a strong backup plan.

Also, I wonder how many delegates have you blocked from last time?
The preemptive liberation against CCD has guaranteed the immediate vulnerability of the region when the Founder is either deleted or ceases to exist, and an active Founder only increases the possibility that the nation may be deleted. If the "strong backup plan" includes sharing of the Founder region, that would increase the possibility of the nation's deletion as well. Therefore, I would consider for the Liberation to be thriving in that it has fully fulfilled its purpose of increasing regional vulnerability to a significant extent. On the topic of delegates who have blocked me, many have already changed since then, and I've planned to pair each offensive liberation with a companion General Assembly resolution for variety and to decrease voter apathy.

Vetelo wrote:I think if you're going to try this again, then you should probably take the criticisms received when you first made this thread and apply them. The USSD does not have any one ideology, and "Stalinist" in no way describes how our region operates. A part of our government is directly elected and transparent, I wouldn't really call that "Stalinist". So maybe go think of some actual reasons to liberate us. Not that I expect this resolution to ever pass, but it's a minor nuisance to our region at best anyways. We only password during Z-Day. I'm not quitting this game anytime soon, and if I do, I will hand my founder nation over to someone who I trust.
I will be removing the term "Stalinist," but due to Caelapes' criticisms rather than yours:
Caelapes wrote:USSD isn’t isolated because they are trying to apply “Socialism in one country” to NationStates as opposed to Trotsky’s theory of permanent revolution. They don’t have a coherent ideology beyond building up a cult of personality around toxic behavior. They aren’t “Stalinist” because nothing they do relates to Marxism-Leninism, which was the actual ideology practiced in the Soviet Union under Stalin’s leadership.
Furthermore, an offensive liberation is proposed with the express understanding that the Founder is either likely to cease to exist or be deleted due to the various qualities of the region that cause it to be offensively liberated in the first place.
A Proud Francoist Feederite.
Discord: Lanav#0940 | FCN delenda est.
Author of 4 SC Resolutions. | GP Alignment: 2, 19 | Clarification on My Aliases.

User avatar
Kaboomlandia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7281
Founded: May 22, 2013
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Kaboomlandia » Fri Dec 07, 2018 8:33 pm

La Navasse wrote:
Kaboomlandia wrote:The pre-emptive liberation against CCD isn't "thriving" no matter how much you try and spin it. Not only has absolutely no action been taken against the region since then, but I cannot foresee any action ever coming. The second-place nation in endorsements has 120, which is pretty much out of the realm of possibility. A liberation is just not practical in this circumstance, with an active founder and a strong backup plan.

Also, I wonder how many delegates have you blocked from last time?
The preemptive liberation against CCD has guaranteed the immediate vulnerability of the region when the Founder is either deleted or ceases to exist, and an active Founder only increases the possibility that the nation may be deleted. If the "strong backup plan" includes sharing of the Founder region, that would increase the possibility of the nation's deletion as well. Therefore, I would consider for the Liberation to be thriving in that it has fully fulfilled its purpose of increasing regional vulnerability to a significant extent. On the topic of delegates who have blocked me, many have already changed since then, and I've planned to pair each offensive liberation with a companion General Assembly resolution for variety and to decrease voter apathy.


1. Playing the long game as you theorized has not worked here, and the region has gotten at least 50% more endorsements on their WAD since the lib passed, and the backup delegate is now about where the original WAD was at the time of the lib endorsement-wise, with about 120 endos.

2. Even if the founder CTEs, you and what army is going to pull this off, especially considering most of the larger raider orgs likely still remember Dank Memes?

3. Delegates blocking all campaign telegrams happens and isn't often something that just gets taken off, and unless CTEing has something to do with it I don't know many people would have specifically removed you from their block list.

4. Your last sentence forces me to question whether you a) actually know how to write a GA resolution and b) actually think that idea will work.
Last edited by Kaboomlandia on Fri Dec 07, 2018 8:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
In=character, Kaboomlandia is a World Assembly member and abides by its resolutions. If this nation isn't in the WA, it's for practical reasons.
Author of GA #371 and SC #208, #214, #226, #227, #230, #232
Co-Author of SC #204
"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result."
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

"Your legitimacy, Kaboom, has melted away in my eyes. I couldn't have believed that only a shadow of your once brilliant WA career remains."

User avatar
Borovan entered the region as he
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 148
Founded: Dec 18, 2017
Conservative Democracy

Postby Borovan entered the region as he » Fri Dec 07, 2018 8:42 pm

Against. The last offensive liberation or neoliberation, against the coailtion of fascist nations failed,
I don't think these will passed just because of a founder being blacklisted and having a stalinist ideology. Also many people don't know about farkasfalka is. Its not as known as CCD where they ended up annoying people or nazi europa.
Last edited by Borovan entered the region as he on Fri Dec 07, 2018 8:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Tupelope wrote:ps vote for me for those defender awards ty

Antifa forces have attacked a fast food restaurant.
Marnia the largest burger chain company proposed a merger with Izea burgers after profits in both companies have weakened. The Commerce Department will examine the legality and effects of the merger. "Burgers must be low cost!" yelled Michael Marnia. "Big government is butting itself in free entreprise. I tell you, we must scream for big government to get out of the way!"

User avatar
La Navasse
Diplomat
 
Posts: 513
Founded: Mar 06, 2016
Father Knows Best State

An Update & Responses III

Postby La Navasse » Sun Dec 16, 2018 3:14 pm

Kaboomlandia wrote:
La Navasse wrote:The preemptive liberation against CCD has guaranteed the immediate vulnerability of the region when the Founder is either deleted or ceases to exist, and an active Founder only increases the possibility that the nation may be deleted. If the "strong backup plan" includes sharing of the Founder region, that would increase the possibility of the nation's deletion as well. Therefore, I would consider for the Liberation to be thriving in that it has fully fulfilled its purpose of increasing regional vulnerability to a significant extent. On the topic of delegates who have blocked me, many have already changed since then, and I've planned to pair each offensive liberation with a companion General Assembly resolution for variety and to decrease voter apathy.


1. Playing the long game as you theorized has not worked here, and the region has gotten at least 50% more endorsements on their WAD since the lib passed, and the backup delegate is now about where the original WAD was at the time of the lib endorsement-wise, with about 120 endos.

2. Even if the founder CTEs, you and what army is going to pull this off, especially considering most of the larger raider orgs likely still remember Dank Memes?

3. Delegates blocking all campaign telegrams happens and isn't often something that just gets taken off, and unless CTEing has something to do with it I don't know many people would have specifically removed you from their block list.

4. Your last sentence forces me to question whether you a) actually know how to write a GA resolution and b) actually think that idea will work.

1. The long game cannot be said to not work when it hasn't even ended.
2. "You and what army" is a misrepresentation of my position. Although I author this offensive liberation, I don't lead any army - I believe USSD's blacklisted status by GP is sufficient for an invasion to occur whenever the Founder ceases to exist. Also, out of everyone in this thread only you bring up Dank Memes, which just goes to show how irrelevant it is.
3. WA Campaigns are still being sent out, and still bring proposals to quorum. Additionally, many WA delegates simply change by election or with time, and I'm using a new official campaigning nation called The La Navassean WA Delegation. Campaignmageddon hasn't happened yet. ;)
4. See The Cloning Conventions.

Borovan entered the region as he wrote:Against. The last offensive liberation or neoliberation, against the coailtion of fascist nations failed,
I don't think these will passed just because of a founder being blacklisted and having a stalinist ideology. Also many people don't know about farkasfalka is. Its not as known as CCD where they ended up annoying people or nazi europa.

As I said, one instance of failure is not representative of the entire concept's failure. Additionally, the entire region is blacklisted, not just the Founder, and I've already removed mentions of Stalinism in the proposal as labeling the region as such would be a misnomer. Finally, I don't believe Farkasfalka wouldn't pass due to its lack of publicity (especially due to its predecessor being The Iron Order), but I've decided to put a potential Liberate Farkasfalka on hold until the new region has demonstrated sufficient activity that would warrant an offensive liberation.
A Proud Francoist Feederite.
Discord: Lanav#0940 | FCN delenda est.
Author of 4 SC Resolutions. | GP Alignment: 2, 19 | Clarification on My Aliases.

User avatar
West Leas Oros 2
Diplomat
 
Posts: 917
Founded: Jul 15, 2018
Left-wing Utopia

Postby West Leas Oros 2 » Sun Dec 16, 2018 3:21 pm

La Nav, what have you done this time...
West Leas Oros 2, Election Boogaloo (Please ignore the 2 in our name in all IC interactions)
WLO Public News is currently unavailable due to recent Unrest
Does Montgomery really look that ugly?
⚧Copy and paste this into your sig if you did not pay attention in biology and don't care about the difference between gender and sex⚧
Seriously considering giving up on humanity
An accurate description of NationStates: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IQFU1y928dw

User avatar
Kaboomlandia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7281
Founded: May 22, 2013
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Kaboomlandia » Mon Dec 17, 2018 11:42 am

Navasse, your responses to my questions are showing that you have no real plan to see this through. I don't know if you plan on actually raiding these regions, but just throwing this at the wall and hoping someone else decides they want to randomly bring together an army of 90 people and actually spend time trying to attack USSD. I question whether you actually have the expertise to pull off that military operation. There is no "long game" because you don't have a plan at all.

As well, using a different nation for campaigning that still has your name on it isn't going to change people's opinions on you.
In=character, Kaboomlandia is a World Assembly member and abides by its resolutions. If this nation isn't in the WA, it's for practical reasons.
Author of GA #371 and SC #208, #214, #226, #227, #230, #232
Co-Author of SC #204
"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result."
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

"Your legitimacy, Kaboom, has melted away in my eyes. I couldn't have believed that only a shadow of your once brilliant WA career remains."

User avatar
La Navasse
Diplomat
 
Posts: 513
Founded: Mar 06, 2016
Father Knows Best State

Postby La Navasse » Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:58 pm

Kaboomlandia wrote:Navasse, your responses to my questions are showing that you have no real plan to see this through. I don't know if you plan on actually raiding these regions, but just throwing this at the wall and hoping someone else decides they want to randomly bring together an army of 90 people and actually spend time trying to attack USSD. I question whether you actually have the expertise to pull off that military operation. There is no "long game" because you don't have a plan at all.

As well, using a different nation for campaigning that still has your name on it isn't going to change people's opinions on you.

I'm not "just throwing this at the wall and hoping someone else decides they want to randomly bring together an army of 90 people and actually spend time trying to attack USSD." There is interest from leftist regions out there for this resolution, which unfortunately you appear to have ignored, starting with the very first reply to the proposal.

I'm sure using a different campaigning nation wouldn't change your opinion of me, but I have been retired for months. I would venture to say that I'm not in the minds of WA Delegates all the time, but I am in yours.
A Proud Francoist Feederite.
Discord: Lanav#0940 | FCN delenda est.
Author of 4 SC Resolutions. | GP Alignment: 2, 19 | Clarification on My Aliases.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Byzantine Law, Kaboomlandia, Zenithian

Advertisement

Remove ads