La Navasse wrote:102 out of 106, despite three counter-campaigns, one of which you ran, which clearly show that your attempt to stifle support failed. I may have failed to reach quorum, but I have demonstrated I have considerable, strong, and continuous support across submissions.Indo-Malaysia wrote:102 out of how many delegates? Exactly.Bring up new points then, and stop trying to get me to go through all of my old points again. We're looking for solutions, not conflicts.Indo-Malaysia wrote:Hahahahaha, good one.
Wait.. Your being serious right?
We posted plenty of hard evidence disproving you, and you tried to brush it off by saying 'well I said it's evil so that's the way it is'.
You have consistently failed to provide evidence, and I doubt any of the GCR's want to attack an anti-Fascist region.
Give me a call when Liberate ANTIFA, Liberate The MT Army and Liberate North Korea pop up because they seen a Nazi somewhere.Yes, except when you're running out of points to debate and try to get me to get all of my links for you so that you can go through them all over again.Kaboomlandia wrote: Good. Link me to it.
You know the point of writing a resolution is to debate things, right?Whatever players in this thread that you're referencing are not representative of all the Delegates in the WA, nor of all of the Members, either.Kaboomlandia wrote:[
At least 95% of the people in this thread oppose this resolution.
1. False. 102 out of 1'769 delegates supported this offensive liberation. Seriously how hard is it to use SC terminology.
2. Why should I be arsed bringing up new points when you failed to answer the ones I already given. Me and Kaboom pulled lots of evidence disproving you, and you tried to pull the fake news card even though most of the posts were yours.
3. The only person running out of points is you. Now, you run from any piece of evidence or criticism.
4. Err... It's the SC forum.