[Rejected] Condemn Mourinholand

[Catlander]

Condemn Mourinholand


Category: Condemnation | Nominee: Mourinholand | Proposed By: Catlander


The Security Council,

UNDERSTANDING that all the nations could to have reason to do extreme policies againts their population and treats to their region.

NOTING that Mourinholand violated the following Human & Civil rights Resolutions solved in General Assembly:

#4 Restrictions on Child Labour
#7 Workplace Safety Standard Act
#9 Torture
#23 Ban of Slavery Traffic

FURTHER NOTING that Mourinholand executes the poets and homeless people, the life expectancy is less 30 years old, their leader spreads napalm to clean the forest or treat to use nuclear arms againts their neighbours and many other cruelties.

BELIEVING that Mourinholand should not continue in the World Assembly like as a member by their horrible acts.

HEREBY Condemns Mourinholand

[Fauxia]

RP condemnations are very difficult to pass, though not inpossible, but this needs work if you want it to go somewhere

[Catlander]

I have read all the resolutions on human rights (noticed above) that every nation must contemplate to stand like WA member.

I appeal to rest of the SC nations to abide by these passed resolutions to condemn the accused. I remember to everybody that those Human Rights resolutions of SC are compulsory for all.

[Willania Imperium]

I'm sorry to say this, but I just don't see the reason why? It's mostly RP where it violates the proposals, but it's a small RP that very few actually recognize. Plus, one clause is basically a rip-off a nation's results to the Issues. That is something very few really give a damn about. Plus, the idea of condemnations is quite different in the eyes of most voters than in your eyes. Most of us see them as "badges if Honor" given out to those whose actions are starkingly amazing but can't be commended through normal means. As such, I don't see the target of doing anything bad that can get it. As such, I am fiercely "Against" it.

[Catlander]

But... no one is going to take seriously the violation of the our laws of SC?. How we will going to take our passed resolutions seriously then?

This is an intolerable shame!. I demand an explanation from the WA authorities.

[Kenmoria]

If you gave an SC condemnation to mourinland it would seriously devalue every other condemnation. Almost every single condemnation has been given for raiding and the system can be summed as being "bad with style". If someone wants to play as a dictatorship why should we stop them? Doing this sort of thing would alienate the many players who enjoy being tyrannical and wish to play in the WA.

But... no one is going to take seriously the violation of the our laws of SC?. How we will going to take our passed resolutions seriously then?

This is an intolerable shame!. I demand an explanation from the WA authorities.

I admit I am not the WA authorities but violating GA laws is not grounds for a condemnation. Once I misclicked on an issue and made divorce illegal. This is against a resolution but I doubt anyone would see it as grounds to permanently mark my nation as condemned.

[Catlander]

@kenmoria

All resolutions passed are the result of our GA democracy. All member nations solemnly voted to abide by them (too its effects). If some nation doesn't like a resolution ever can to try change it.

Thus, If we do not do this... what is the WA for?

[Tinhampton]

ICly, Tinhampton is for due to the arguments made right over here back in August.

[Kenmoria]

@kenmoria

All resolutions passed are the result of our GA democracy. All member nations solemnly voted to abide by them (too its effects). If some nation doesn't like a resolution ever can to try change it.

Thus, If we do not do this... what is the WA for?

The WA is for role playing and creating international laws for fun. It is not to go around condemning everyone due to what they want to do with their nation.

[Catlander]

@Tinhampton your link failed

@Kenmoria I understand it, but that's not right.

Since that you agree to become a member of the WA, the passed resolutions will affect your nation. Consider that if many nations can do bad things without control, we will also let them vote as much as they want in the WA in resolutions that will affect our nations. Think about it.

[Manaime]

Condemn Mourinholand


Category: Condemnation | Nominee: Mourinholand | Proposed By: Catlander


The Security Council,

UNDERSTANDING that all the nations could to have reason to do extreme policies againts their population and treats to their region.

NOTING that Mourinholand violated the following Human & Civil rights Resolutions solved in General Assembly:

#4 Restrictions on Child Labour
#7 Workplace Safety Standard Act
#9 Torture
#23 Ban of Slavery Traffic

FURTHER NOTING that Mourinoland executes the poets and homeless people, the life expectancy is less 30 years old, their goverment spreads napalm to clean the forest or treat to use nuclear arms againts their neighbours and many other cruelties.

BELIEVING that Mourinholand should not continue in the World Assembly like as a member by their horrible acts.

HEREBY Condemns Mourinholand

Fix your spelling errors before even making an action on the WA page.

[Oresland]

Condemn Mourinholand


Category: Condemnation | Nominee: Mourinholand | Proposed By: Catlander


FURTHER NOTING that Mourinoland executes the poets and homeless people, the life expectancy is less 30 years old, their goverment spreads napalm to clean the forest or treat to use nuclear arms againts their neighbours and many other cruelties.

Fix your spelling errors before even making an action on the WA page.

"Neighbour" is correctly spelled, at least for the British.

On the other hand, this is all RP'ing. If the WA stripped nations of their membership because of "violating" some resolutions (even accidentally), then condemnations would really lose their value. Our nation will be Against this proposal.

[Manaime]

Fix your spelling errors before even making an action on the WA page.

"Neighbour" is correctly spelled, at least for the British.

On the other hand, this is all RP'ing. If the WA stripped nations of their membership because of "violating" some resolutions (even accidentally), then condemnations would really lose their value. Our nation will be Against this proposal.

Apparently, "neighbour" is not even a word. The correct spelling is "neighbor". Understand the difference?

{BTW, my computer is going too crazy as for underlining the word "neighbour" in red. >_>]

[Oresland]

"Neighbour" is correctly spelled, at least for the British.

On the other hand, this is all RP'ing. If the WA stripped nations of their membership because of "violating" some resolutions (even accidentally), then condemnations would really lose their value. Our nation will be Against this proposal.

Apparently, "neighbour" is not even a word. The correct spelling is "neighbor". Understand the difference?

{BTW, my computer is going too crazy as for underlining the word "neighbour" in red. >_>]

Oxford dictionary says it's a word:
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/neighbour

[Catlander]

I have already made all the necessary corrections, but not in relation to the term "neighbours"

We the nations we shall change all resolutions we need (repealing too) into the World Assembly democratic rules ever we want, indeed.

[Tinhampton]

We the nations we shall change all resolutions we need (repealing too) into the World Assembly democratic rules ever we want, indeed.

IC: What will these "World Assembly democratic rules" entail?
OOC: Hmmm... you are aware that you have to repeal WA laws to replace them, right?

[Catlander]

We the nations we shall change all resolutions we need (repealing too) into the World Assembly democratic rules ever we want, indeed.

IC: What will these "World Assembly democratic rules" entail?
OOC: Hmmm... you are aware that you have to repeal WA laws to replace them, right?

1. I told before that all WA resolutions need to do by members who will respect it; otherwise the WA will be unable seriously.
2.Abso!utely. That's the democracy.

[The Atlae Isles]

Condemnations are usually more reserved for regional/world contributions (or the opposite thereof), not enforcing compliance. That's what the WACC is for.

Also, the SC cannot eject anybody from the WA. Only mods can do that.

[Benevolent Thomas]

I'm going to have to echo the opinions of the others in this discussion. Answering issues is hardly special. If you would like to condemn a nation for flagrantly disregarding the laws of the World Assembly, I'd like to see an extensive history of doing so, with rich in-character (RP) examples of how they've decided to flaunt their treachery.

[Catlander]

Right now you can to agree the CP in the Security Council

We need to save the mourinhists children !

https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_view_proposal/id=catlander_1505899372

[Greater Gilead]

(Merle Warren stands.)
We are extremely against this proposal, on the grounds that leaders may well have reasons for breaking the rules. I mean, come on, you list him as breaking four resolutions. That's nothing. We compiled a list of the ones we break. Here, check it out.
(Merle Warren holds up a paper: https://www.nationstates.net/nation=gre ... /id=867036 )
Yes, that is sixty-six resolutions we do not follow. And you are going after this dictator for four? I think you either have a ulterior motive for condemning him, or you have misplaced priorities.
Thank You
(Merle Warren sits.)

[Catlander]

OOC: Este tio es un cachondo... (What a troll! )

Serious Bussiness:

Ahhhhm, alright!. alright!. Pay attention please: maybe Mourinholand break 4 resolutions ONLY it could be considered a legal nonsense, a silly joke, a knick-knack legal snack pack, etc. etc. but a man need to be part of all Humanity and the rights of one need to be preserve by the right of the others. Listen the words of the judge Dan Haywood about this matter:

Veredict at Security Clouncil

[The Atlae Isles]

Condemnations only give people a shiny badge. It does not kick them out of the WA. (R3)

Did you read any of the criticism? They are simply not condemnable.

[Ransium]

I think it's legal, it doesn't say the target nation will be removed from the WA, just that the WASC believes they should be.

[Aclion]

I think it's legal, it doesn't say the target nation will be removed from the WA, just that the WASC believes they should be.

Its sort of absurd though from an IC pov, since theres no way for members to be removed.