[DRAFT] Condemn Christian Democrats

[Sciongrad]

OOC: Based on his recent use of a puppet against me, my best guess is that the author is Imperium Anglorum.

IA has only ever used italicised operative clauses, as used in this resolution, (i.e. Noting) once: His first resolution, GA#326 "Repeal "Responsible Arms Trading"". Other than that, he always uses non-emphasised operative clauses (i.e. Noting). Why exactly do you think that IA would use this puppet - out of all of his other puppets - to write your Condemnation?

OOC: Not only that. IA has explicitly expressed how much he hates italicization in a dozen occasion at least.

[Imperium Anglorum]

I don't think IA talks to himself either.

But IA, why would you write this proposal?!

[Fauxia]

The Security Council,

Believing that the World Assembly delegation of Christian Democrats has, in many ways, enacted their will upon the innocent members of this Assembly,

Observing the discourse that has emerged from their actions, attempting to impose a hard-line conservative dogma upon member nations,

Horrified that possible success of their many attempts to strip bare international legislation protecting women's rights would undermine the General Assembly's purpose and goals in promoting human rights at large,

Bearing to the light the long history of abominable legislation and usurpations proposed by their WA delegation, including:

1. two attempts to undermine international protections of female bodily autonomy, allowing member nations to restrict the rights of women to control their own bodies,
   
   
2. an attempt to strip ambassadors and consulates of their protections, making it significantly harder to conduct diplomacy and preserve the peace,
   
   
3. an attempt to prevent nations from exercising their power to tax, depriving them of needed funds and reducing the stability of member nations,
   
   
4. an attempt to force nations to allow the use of hallucinogenic drugs in their jurisdictions,
   
   
5. a successful attempt to prevent companies in member nations from insuring against the loss of valuable employees,
   
   
6. an attempt to repeal the right of people to contract with specious interpretations of World Assembly legislation, preventing from exercising their right to their own labour,
   
   
7. an attempt to prevent nations from integrating minorities and restrict the promotion of tolerance in society by preventing them from regulating education, leading to a less tolerant and more divisive society, and
   
   
8. two attempts to legislate into international law pseudo-scientific quackery, promoting fear of genetically modified organisms on the international stage, thereby reducing crop yields and increasing the chance of famine across the world,

Outraged at their establishment, through intermediaries, of a region, Right to Life, devoted to advancing their radical ideology and promoting attempts by others to further undermine such legislation,

Noticing their attempts to undermine feeder region legitimacy and self-determination with infiltration of the Rejected Realms and subversion of regional sovereignty, usurping the power of the people to their selfish ends,

Appalled by their bringing more issues and problems before the nations of the world, throwing national governments into dysfunction and disruption,

Dismayed by their hypocrisy in requiring self-responsibility of others while spoiling any chance of maintaining that responsibility by formerly maintaining a list of issues faced by all nations, and

Desiring to quickly get this over with, hereby,

Condemns Christian Democrats.

You're literally not even in the WA.

[Fauxia]

I don't think IA talks to himself either.

But IA, why would you write this proposal?!

Dunno, that's you. I, personally, agree with CDs, partly bc I don't believe he'd use a puppet to commend himself, and that he seems to have a bit of a beef with IA.

[Frisbeeteria]

You're literally not even in the WA.

Once again, let's stop using that argument. A nation can join the WA in seconds, visit a feeder, and get 10 endorsements in 10 minutes. It's not a factor, so let's stop bringing it up.

[Cerian Quilor]

I am all for any condemnation of CD.

[Kylia Quilor]

Uhm.... when haa condemnation accomplished anything? You are in the wrong game if you think condemnations and commendations are about accomplishing anything beyond amusement and trophies.

[Echax]

Uhm.... when haa condemnation accomplished anything? You are in the wrong game if you think condemnations and commendations are about accomplishing anything beyond amusement and trophies.

I just want to do my part in recognising this nominee's accomplishments and contributions to the world of NationStates.

[Bhang Bhang Duc]

Uhm.... when haa condemnation accomplished anything? You are in the wrong game if you think condemnations and commendations are about accomplishing anything beyond amusement and trophies.

I just want to do my part in recognising this nominee's accomplishments and contributions to the world of NationStates.

Well if that's so then I think it's put up or shut up time. Let's see this draft submitted.

[Kylia Quilor]

Uhm.... when haa condemnation accomplished anything? You are in the wrong game if you think condemnations and commendations are about accomplishing anything beyond amusement and trophies.

I just want to do my part in recognising this nominee's accomplishments and contributions to the world of NationStates.

I was talking to Oldesta. I'm all for this condemnation.

[Omigodtheykilledkenny]

Listing and describing each and every past proposal seems long-winded. Pick out a few of the most notable efforts.

I assume from the author's recent posts that this is a commend-by-condemning effort?

[Kylia Quilor]

God I hope not. CD deserves only ridicule and condemnation, not backhanded praise.

[Sciongrad]

God I hope not. CD deserves only ridicule and condemnation, not backhanded praise.

Why?

[Kylia Quilor]

Because I don't like him. Thought that would be obvious.

[Thermodolia]

Because I don't like him. Thought that would be obvious.

I'm not the biggest fan of CD but I don't think he deserves a condemnation that's just nuts

[Kylia Quilor]

Because I don't like him. Thought that would be obvious.

I'm not the biggest fan of CD but I don't think he deserves a condemnation that's just nuts

Everyone's allowed to think what they want and respond to stimuli the way they want.

[Consular]

I would prefer he was neither commended nor condemned.

[Kylia Quilor]

How about a new catagory, that says 'nobody likes you but condemnations have become a badge of honor, so this new thing tells you everyone hates you?'

[United Massachusetts]

How about a new catagory, that says 'nobody likes you but condemnations have become a badge of honor, so this new thing tells you everyone hates you?'

I, for all my disagreements with him, like CD.

[The Atlae Isles]

Definitely not worth a condemnation.

[Bhang Bhang Duc]

How about a new catagory, that says 'nobody likes you but condemnations have become a badge of honor, so this new thing tells you everyone hates you?'

A Detestation?

I would prefer he was neither commended nor condemned.

Likewise. I'll just keep voting against anything they submit. It's the best way.

[Kylia Quilor]

How about a new catagory, that says 'nobody likes you but condemnations have become a badge of honor, so this new thing tells you everyone hates you?'

I, for all my disagreements with him, like CD.

Well yeah because you both agree women's bodies are the state's to decide what to do with.

[Consular]

I, for all my disagreements with him, like CD.

Well yeah because you both agree women's bodies are the state's to decide what to do with.

It's ironic in a way, given CD's insistence that the state cannot intrude upon the supposed rights of the "family".

[Christian Democrats]

Well yeah because you both agree women's bodies are the state's to decide what to do with.

It's ironic in a way, given CD's insistence that the state cannot intrude upon the supposed rights of the "family".

Killing one's own children definitely crosses a line.

[Kylia Quilor]

It's ironic in a way, given CD's insistence that the state cannot intrude upon the supposed rights of the "family".

Killing one's own children definitely crosses a line.

Except that isn't what abortion is.