[SUBMITTED] Repeal "Liberate Dank Memes"

[Forces of Doom]

The Security Council of The World Assembly,

NOTING that the resolution was originally meant to stop HYDRA Command from refounding Dank Memes into a
trophy region.

ACKNOWLEDGING that while the proposal did not stop Dank Memes from being refounded, it was refounded because of an agreement between Dank Memes and Nazi Europa to hawk the region from HYDRA Command

FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGING that Captain Woodhouse imposed a password and closed Dank Memes, making them all move to their new home, DankMemes, where they are still there at the time of the writing of this proposal.

OBSERVING that a liberation strikes down Delegate-Imposed barriers, but a liberation does not work when a founder imposed the password,

HEREBY REPEALS SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION #205, LIBERATE DANK MEMES

[Bhang Bhang Duc]

If you can't be bothered to spell check your proposal why should anyone support it?

While many of us agree that 205 should be removed from the books, I would not support this sloppily written attempt.

[Forces of Doom]

How about now?

[Tinhampton]

Security council resolution #205 should be struck out and rendered null and void.

You don't need to put this in your repeal. It does that for you automatically.

[Bhang Bhang Duc]

How about now?

Somewhat better.

Ok couple of bits of advice. Firstly space the clauses out, looks better. Secondly, I understand what you're trying to say, it's just that it does not come across clearly.

Finally your "Further Acknowledging" and "Observing" clauses are saying exactly the same thing. Also it's not a Liberation Proposal you are trying to repeal, it's a Liberation. It was a proposal until it was passed.

Glad to see you're making an effort to improve.

[Honeydewistan]

Security council resolution #205 should be struck out and rendered null and void.

You don't need to put this in your repeal. It does that for you automatically.

Oh it does? Thank you.

How about now?

Somewhat better.

Ok couple of bits of advice. Firstly space the clauses out, looks better. Secondly, I understand what you're trying to say, it's just that it does not come across clearly.

Finally your "Further Acknowledging" and "Observing" clauses are saying exactly the same thing. Also it's not a Liberation Proposal you are trying to repeal, it's a Liberation. It was a proposal until it was passed.

Glad to see you're making an effort to improve.

I see.

[Forces of Doom]

Security council resolution #205 should be struck out and rendered null and void.

You don't need to put this in your repeal. It does that for you automatically.

So should I put...
The Security Council of The Wa,
or nothing at all?

[Kaboomlandia]

You don't need to put this in your repeal. It does that for you automatically.

So should I put...
The Security Council of The Wa,
or nothing at all?

Nothing at all. That line is a boilerplate in every WA repeal submitted, GA or SC.

[Forces of Doom]

So should I put...
The Security Council of The Wa,
or nothing at all?

Nothing at all. That line is a boilerplate in every WA repeal submitted, GA or SC.

So I also have to remove 'The Security Council of The World Assembly'?

[Fratatstan]

Nothing at all. That line is a boilerplate in every WA repeal submitted, GA or SC.

So I also have to remove 'The Security Council of The World Assembly'?

No, you can keep that. Tinhampton and Kaboomlandia were both referring to "Security council resolution #205 should be struck out and rendered null and void", which is automatically added when you submit a repeal proposal.

[Forces of Doom]

So I also have to remove 'The Security Council of The World Assembly'?

No, you can keep that. Tinhampton and Kaboomlandia were both referring to "Security council resolution #205 should be struck out and rendered null and void", which is automatically added when you submit a repeal proposal.

Ah. Thank you.

[Cepcecic Ghost]

No, you can keep that. Tinhampton and Kaboomlandia were both referring to "Security council resolution #205 should be struck out and rendered null and void", which is automatically added when you submit a repeal proposal.

Ah. Thank you.

May I inquire about the subtle Saudi flag watermark in your nation flag?

[Bhang Bhang Duc]

Ah. Thank you.

May I inquire about the subtle Saudi flag watermark in your nation flag?

What has that got to do with the draft?

Talking about which:

FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGING that Captain Woodhouse imposed a password and closed Dank Memes, making them all move to their new home, DankMemes, where they are still there at the time of the writing of this proposal

In this clause I think you should really mention that a Founder imposed password is not affected by a Liberation, making the Liberation pointless, something like that anyway.

[Forces of Doom]

May I inquire about the subtle Saudi flag watermark in your nation flag?

What has that got to do with the draft?

Talking about which:

FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGING that Captain Woodhouse imposed a password and closed Dank Memes, making them all move to their new home, DankMemes, where they are still there at the time of the writing of this proposal

In this clause I think you should really mention that a Founder imposed password is not affected by a Liberation, making the Liberation pointless, something like that anyway.

Precisely!

What is wrong with a Saudi watermark? Maybe take a look at your own flag first. By the way, sorry to hear RR didn't make it.

[Forces of Doom]

is it ready?

[Forces of Doom]

I have submitted it using my puppet Honeydewistan II.

I did so because DankMemes region would need a liberation soon.....