NationStates

Meme Star wrote:How do I join "SC"

As a WA member, you are automatically a member of both Chambers.

May I start a discussion thread in the SC about players who deserve commend\condemns and have not had proposals written about them yet? Asking for names and suggestions and such?

Escade wrote:May I start a discussion thread in the SC about players who deserve commend\condemns and have not had proposals written about them yet? Asking for names and suggestions and such?

Go for it! A few people have done that. Here's one from a few years ago: viewtopic.php?f=24&t=266971&hilit

Jakker wrote:

Escade wrote:May I start a discussion thread in the SC about players who deserve commend\condemns and have not had proposals written about them yet? Asking for names and suggestions and such?

Go for it! A few people have done that. Here's one from a few years ago: viewtopic.php?f=24&t=266971&hilit

theres 1 literally on the 2nd page viewtopic.php?f=24&t=402817&start=200

How do you liberate a nation who is also a member of the World Assembly?

Kand Sovi wrote:How do you liberate a nation who is also a member of the World Assembly?

Liberations do not apply to nations, they apply to regions only.

Are mentioning offsites and/or forums in a SC proposal allowed?

Dinoium wrote:Are mentioning offsites and/or forums in a SC proposal allowed?

Its allowed as long as its not a reference to the technical aspect. Saying "forum" is legal, saying "offsite forum" however is not.

Lenlyvit wrote:

Dinoium wrote:Are mentioning offsites and/or forums in a SC proposal allowed?

Its allowed as long as its not a reference to the technical aspect. Saying "forum" is legal, saying "offsite forum" however is not.

Ah alright, thanks

I got another question, in 4.1 of SC rules, how would you define real world, just the word, RL countries, or what happens in the Real World?

Dinoium wrote:I got another question, in 4.1 of SC rules, how would you define real world, just the word, RL countries, or what happens in the Real World?

That one is a bit trickier. You can't reference real world actions, so you can't commend/condemn for OOC behavior. You also can't reference real world legislation, governments, or organizations.

Can we commend or condemn non WA nations?

Kuwi wrote:Can we commend or condemn non WA nations?

Yes indeed!

If someone proposes a commendation, a very rough one and you were working on commending the same person with other co-authors (and have a much more solid draft) then:

Do you post your draft in that person's thread?

Or can you create a new thread?

Escade wrote:If someone proposes a commendation, a very rough one and you were working on commending the same person with other co-authors (and have a much more solid draft) then:

Do you post your draft in that person's thread?

Or can you create a new thread?

Create your own thread Escade. If you post your draft in another's drafting thread it could constitute thread jacking.

Kuriko wrote:

Escade wrote:If someone proposes a commendation, a very rough one and you were working on commending the same person with other co-authors (and have a much more solid draft) then:

Do you post your draft in that person's thread?

Or can you create a new thread?

Create your own thread Escade. If you post your draft in another's drafting thread it could constitute thread jacking.

No. Post it in the same thread. Please leave moderation to the moderstors.

The better way would be to just get OP to post your version.

Ransium wrote:

Kuriko wrote:Create your own thread Escade. If you post your draft in another's drafting thread it could constitute thread jacking.

No. Post it in the same thread. Please leave moderation to the moderstors.

The better way would be to just get OP to post your version.

Why would it not be considered thread jacking to post a draft you wrote in someone else's draft thread Ransium? If you wrote a proposal, and created a draft thread, would you want someone else to jack your thread by posting their draft there?

Oops, sorry, I totally misread the question. I thought Escade was asking if they were the co-author with OP. If they are not co-author you were right. Sorry.

Thanks and sorry for the confusion! I mean if you were writing a proposal for the same player. I imagine if the one already written was comprehensive we might be expected to combine with them or add on to theirs. If on the other hand it was rough (or we have no idea who the OP is) then we might put up our own original draft.

Escade wrote:Thanks and sorry for the confusion! I mean if you were writing a proposal for the same player. I imagine if the one already written was comprehensive we might be expected to combine with them or add on to theirs. If on the other hand it was rough (or we have no idea who the OP is) then we might put up our own original draft.

That ... didn't reduce the confusion. At all.

Ransium wrote:Oops, sorry, I totally misread the question. I thought Escade was asking if they were the co-author with OP. If they are not co-author you were right. Sorry.

Scenario 1

Basically two player groups want to write a proposal for a nation, "Yuno" ( <3)

Player A put up a draft that is very rough or incomplete.

Player B (or me in this situation) has no clue who Player A is and had been working on a more comprehensive draft with a set of co-authors. Therefore, may I post mine's separately or do I have to post it with Player A. That was the original question which was resolved.

Scenario 2

Basically two player groups want to write a proposal for a nation, "Yuno" (<3)

Player A put up a draft that is very comprehensive and detailed and seems to be gaining traction.

Player B also was working on a draft for the same player. In this case, in my mind it would make more sense to add relevant draft sections to the already well-written one. Maybe if there was enough content and they talked it with the OP, become a co-author. However, possibly I'm wrong about this. Anyway, my relevant question was resolved already.

Is it true the SC is biased, corrupt, and oppressive?

Tigrexia wrote:Is it true the SC is biased, corrupt, and oppressive?

Can confirm is true

Atzcapotzalco wrote:

Tigrexia wrote:Is it true the SC is biased, corrupt, and oppressive?

Can confirm it true

I knew it. Typical.

This thread is for SC related questions and answers, not the spam you are doing right now. Please stop spamming the thread.