SC Questions & Answers

by **Honeydewistania** » Mon Aug 17, 2020 2:46 am

Silver Commonwealth wrote:Which Security Council proposal had the most closest vote? (Both ''for'' and ''against'' percentages and/or numbers being very close, like a proposal passing with 0.5% more votes)

Commend Glen-Rhodes failed by two votes.

by **Morover** » Mon Aug 17, 2020 2:07 pm

Honeydewistania wrote:
Silver Commonwealth wrote:Which Security Council proposal had the most closest vote? (Both ''for'' and ''against'' percentages and/or numbers being very close, like a proposal passing with 0.5% more votes)

Commend Glen-Rhodes failed by two votes.

Silver Commonwealth wrote:Which Security Council proposal had the most closest vote? (Both ''for'' and ''against'' percentages and/or numbers being very close, like a proposal passing with 0.5% more votes)

viewtopic.php?p=37181929#p37181929 <--- if you want to read it.

by **Makdon** » Thu Sep 03, 2020 12:24 pm

Is regional message board a legal term, or is it illegal per 4c?

by **Kuriko** » Thu Sep 03, 2020 12:43 pm

Makdon wrote:Is regional message board a legal term, or is it illegal per 4c?

Regional message board is legal last I checked.

by **Makdon** » Thu Sep 03, 2020 12:51 pm

Kuriko wrote:Regional message board is legal last I checked.

Thanks a lot!

by **The Unified Missourtama States** » Tue Sep 15, 2020 7:13 am

How have puppets been addressed in-character in past condemnations?

If you could provide direct quotes or just a list of links, that'd be great!

by **Bhang Bhang Duc** » Tue Sep 15, 2020 7:35 am

The Unified Missourtama States wrote:How have puppets been addressed in-character in past condemnations?

If you could provide direct quotes or just a list of links, that'd be great!

Colonies and satellite states are the two most common examples I’ve seen. There may well be others.

by **The Unified Missourtama States** » Tue Sep 15, 2020 7:51 am

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:
The Unified Missourtama States wrote:How have puppets been addressed in-character in past condemnations?

If you could provide direct quotes or just a list of links, that'd be great!

Colonies and satellite states are the two most common examples I’ve seen. There may well be others.

Thanks!

by **Centrialand** » Thu Oct 01, 2020 12:24 am

what does condemn and commend do? does condemn means you are effectively banned?

by **Bhang Bhang Duc** » Thu Oct 01, 2020 12:31 am

Centrialand wrote:what does condemn and commend do? does condemn means you are effectively banned?

They’re nice shiny badges on the recipients page. They don’t actually do anything, they are a recognition of how well the nation or region has played the good guy or villain for a goodish period of time.

by **Honeydewistania** » Thu Oct 01, 2020 12:39 am

Centrialand wrote:what does condemn and commend do? does condemn means you are effectively banned?

No bans! It’s a badge that gives you attention

by **Centrialand** » Sun Oct 04, 2020 4:52 pm

so you can work towards getting either of the badges if you want recognition? (im not actually planning to get either badge im just a nice and chill person)

by **Praeceps** » Sun Oct 04, 2020 6:04 pm

Centrialand wrote:so you can work towards getting either of the badges if you want recognition? (im not actually planning to get either badge im just a nice and chill person)

Yes. Do notable "good" or "bad" things and perhaps someone will eventually commend/condemn you. From my perspective, I would say that if you have the right skills, writing issues that make it into the game is probably the fastest way to recognition.

by **Noahs Second Country** » Sun Oct 04, 2020 9:30 pm

Centrialand wrote:so you can work towards getting either of the badges if you want recognition? (im not actually planning to get either badge im just a nice and chill person)

I suppose you can "work towards" them but honestly if you have the mindset of "I want to get c/ced" you probably won't be recognized anytime soon. Just put in time to areas of the game you enjoy and eventually people will realize that you're doing great work.

by **Pianaville** » Sat Nov 14, 2020 11:02 am

Is mentioning how close the vote was a valid action in a repeal?

by **Bhang Bhang Duc** » Sat Nov 14, 2020 11:16 am

Pianaville wrote:Is mentioning how close the vote was a valid action in a repeal?

Mentioning it is fine, but you have to address the contents of the resolution you’re trying to repeal. If you are solely relying on the tightness of the original vote then it’s not going to fly.

by **Team Lennox** » Sun Nov 15, 2020 8:03 am

Is there any nations with a commend AND a condemn badge

by **Bhang Bhang Duc** » Sun Nov 15, 2020 8:26 am

Team Lennox wrote:Is there any nations with a commend AND a condemn badge

Based purely on memory I do not believe there are any nations currently holding both badges.

I think Sedge had both at one stage (correct me if I’m wrong) and for some reason Evil Wolf rings a bell, though they only have the Commend badge presently.

Edit: Sedge did have both badges at the same time SC#18 and SC#54 - both repealed. And I think my memory is playing tricks with respect to EW.

by **Team Lennox** » Sun Nov 15, 2020 11:12 am

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:
Team Lennox wrote:Is there any nations with a commend AND a condemn badge

Based purely on memory I do not believe there are any nations currently holding both badges.

I think Sedge had both at one stage (correct me if I’m wrong) and for some reason Evil Wolf rings a bell, though they only have the Commend badge presently.

Edit: Sedge did have both badges at the same time SC#18 and SC#54 - both repealed. And I think my memory is playing tricks with respect to EW.

Oh ty for answering my question

by **Outer Sparta** » Sun Nov 22, 2020 4:22 pm

Centrialand wrote:so you can work towards getting either of the badges if you want recognition? (im not actually planning to get either badge im just a nice and chill person)

If you contribute a lot to NS on the gameplay side, you will gain recognition, for bad or for good. Example is if you're a notorious raider, then you might get a condemnation thrust upon you.

by **Dominioan** » Fri Nov 27, 2020 7:21 pm

Is there a collection of all SC proposals, including failed ones?

by **Honeydewistania** » Fri Nov 27, 2020 7:23 pm

Dominioan wrote:Is there a collection of all SC proposals, including failed ones?

The passed ones are pinned to this forum, the defeated ones are kept by Bormiar (you’d have to search for it and it’s a bit out of date though)

by **Nova Vandalia** » Thu Dec 10, 2020 6:52 am

Honeydewistania wrote:
Dominioan wrote:Is there a collection of all SC proposals, including failed ones?

The passed ones are pinned to this forum, the defeated ones are kept by Bormiar (you’d have to search for it and it’s a bit out of date though)

They've haven't been updated since September at least in the thread on this forum as I jut found out though, just as heads up Dominioan, so I would recommend going to the SC page and looking back for passed ones for the past few of month's.

by **Mauka** » Tue Dec 15, 2020 12:14 pm

I've come to wonder what the reasoning is behind allowing the continuation of a proposal for SC or the GA to continue on despite the author leaving the WA? It seems to me that if the author resigns, then too should their motion, which isn't even up for vote yet. Is there any WA reasoning behind allowing this?

by **Praeceps** » Tue Dec 15, 2020 12:23 pm

Mauka wrote:I've come to wonder what the reasoning is behind allowing the continuation of a proposal for SC or the GA to continue on despite the author leaving the WA? It seems to me that if the author resigns, then too should their motion, which isn't even up for vote yet. Is there any WA reasoning behind allowing this?

I can't speak for the admins, however, mandating that an author maintains WA after submitting their proposal would prohibit them from partaking in R/D.

SC Questions & Answers

Who is online