Advertisement
by Candanadium » Wed Feb 12, 2020 12:10 am
by Sedgistan » Wed Feb 12, 2020 2:05 am
by Candanadium » Wed Feb 12, 2020 2:53 am
Sedgistan wrote:Possibly - but we'd need to know a) what mod/admin action you're referring to, and b) some draft wording for the clause(s) before we can give a definitive comment.
See: viewtopic.php?p=3755837#inappropriate
by Unibot III » Wed Feb 12, 2020 4:37 am
Candanadium wrote:Sedgistan wrote:Possibly - but we'd need to know a) what mod/admin action you're referring to, and b) some draft wording for the clause(s) before we can give a definitive comment.
See: viewtopic.php?p=3755837#inappropriate
The login for the shared founder account of my region was taken by a group of raiders but was later given back to its original owner by an admin, how would I go about describing that? Would something alone the lines of "the Founder nation was taken out of Auralian control through divine intervention" work?
This isn't super relevant to my resolution though, and if there's no appropriate way to cite it without breaking a rule I can drop it.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Bears Armed » Wed Feb 12, 2020 5:30 am
Unibot III wrote:Candanadium wrote:
The login for the shared founder account of my region was taken by a group of raiders but was later given back to its original owner by an admin, how would I go about describing that? Would something alone the lines of "the Founder nation was taken out of Auralian control through divine intervention" work?
This isn't super relevant to my resolution though, and if there's no appropriate way to cite it without breaking a rule I can drop it.
Access to the Founder Nation was seized by _____, and later restored by administrative fiat.
Or just, Access to the Founder Nation was seized by _____, albeit later restored to Auralia.
'Administrative' may still run afoul of R4, these things are always an elephant test. I prefer trying to find solutions to R4 that don't involve resorting to "divine" stuff because it's actually more confusing to non-initiated readers.
by Candanadium » Wed Feb 12, 2020 5:42 am
Unibot III wrote:Candanadium wrote:
The login for the shared founder account of my region was taken by a group of raiders but was later given back to its original owner by an admin, how would I go about describing that? Would something alone the lines of "the Founder nation was taken out of Auralian control through divine intervention" work?
This isn't super relevant to my resolution though, and if there's no appropriate way to cite it without breaking a rule I can drop it.
Access to the Founder Nation was seized by _____, and later restored by administrative fiat.
Or just, Access to the Founder Nation was seized by _____, albeit later restored to Auralia.
'Administrative' may still run afoul of R4, these things are always an elephant test. I prefer trying to find solutions to R4 that don't involve resorting to "divine" stuff because it's actually more confusing to non-initiated readers.
by Unibot III » Wed Feb 12, 2020 1:21 pm
Sedgistan wrote:Of Unibot's suggestions, the second is better ("administrative" in the first would be problemmatic).
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Awesomeland012345 » Wed Feb 26, 2020 8:51 pm
☆ All hail the Holy Awesomeness of Awesomeland012345! ☆ Cheddar ☆
☆ The founder and delegate of Cheddar ☆ Dispatches ☆ alllll haiillll the tunaaaa ☆ Become a dual citizen today! ☆ Join Cheddar! :) pls pls pls ☆ Take a poll! ☆ shh... secret easter eggs!☆
by Borovan entered the region as he » Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:05 pm
Awesomeland012345 wrote:I have a few questions:
1) What are all the rules? I've been trying to finding them for so long, but can never manage to find them.
2) Can I search the SC and GA resolutions by title name?
3) If I want to submit a resolution, how do I put it onto a thread for editing?
4) If someone responds or quotes this post, will I get a notice? (please quote even if I don't get a notice, and telegram me is I don't get a notice)
Also, just give me some important information on the WA's GA and SC.
by Awesomeland012345 » Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:23 pm
Borovan entered the region as he wrote:Awesomeland012345 wrote:I have a few questions:
1) What are all the rules? I've been trying to finding them for so long, but can never manage to find them.
2) Can I search the SC and GA resolutions by title name?
3) If I want to submit a resolution, how do I put it onto a thread for editing?
4) If someone responds or quotes this post, will I get a notice? (please quote even if I don't get a notice, and telegram me is I don't get a notice)
Also, just give me some important information on the WA's GA and SC.
1. Rules are here. viewtopic.php?f=24&t=8809
If you need help on how to make a illegal proposal legal, ask away.
2. Yes if you mean by if you remember the term you can search it with the search function in the SC thread here viewtopic.php?f=24&t=7503
However if you mean by alphabetical title order, likely no. Unless someone actually kept a record of such.
3. Just make a new topic for Security Council forum. Usually there will be responses later and you can edit the topic.
4. Not sure what you mean by this. If you ignore the forums entirely you won't get a notice. I guess you'll know there are responses by looking at your ego search. If it's green, there are new responses. If grey, no new responses.
There's a lot of important stuff on the GA and SC, which can maybe extend into a long guide. Some things: People will find that they the GA and SC rules work differently. Some people would have a preference over which of the rules are easier to understand. The GA can affect your NS stats, but it's up to you if it affects you rping your nation. The GA is like a mock UN. The SC commends and condemns are mostly cosmetic or rp but liberation s affect the game mechanics. It helps to look at other people's drafts and comment feedback if you're starting to create your own GA proposal but keep in mind that there is steep curve considering the rules, hundreds of past resolutions, knowledge required, and need to convince people. For SC, it's just knowing the facts of the a good topic in certain field whether it's a rp, gp, or other field. If you have a nominee in mind after knowing a lot or have an idea, you can interview people and put it in a proposal for a commend or condemnation. Likewise there are also past resolutions.
☆ All hail the Holy Awesomeness of Awesomeland012345! ☆ Cheddar ☆
☆ The founder and delegate of Cheddar ☆ Dispatches ☆ alllll haiillll the tunaaaa ☆ Become a dual citizen today! ☆ Join Cheddar! :) pls pls pls ☆ Take a poll! ☆ shh... secret easter eggs!☆
by Awesomeland012345 » Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:30 pm
☆ All hail the Holy Awesomeness of Awesomeland012345! ☆ Cheddar ☆
☆ The founder and delegate of Cheddar ☆ Dispatches ☆ alllll haiillll the tunaaaa ☆ Become a dual citizen today! ☆ Join Cheddar! :) pls pls pls ☆ Take a poll! ☆ shh... secret easter eggs!☆
by Lord Dominator » Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:35 pm
Awesomeland012345 wrote:wait a sec... are these the GA rules? or are they for the entire WA? viewtopic.php?f=9&t=159348
by Awesomeland012345 » Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:36 pm
Lord Dominator wrote:Awesomeland012345 wrote:wait a sec... are these the GA rules? or are they for the entire WA? viewtopic.php?f=9&t=159348
Those are the GA rules
☆ All hail the Holy Awesomeness of Awesomeland012345! ☆ Cheddar ☆
☆ The founder and delegate of Cheddar ☆ Dispatches ☆ alllll haiillll the tunaaaa ☆ Become a dual citizen today! ☆ Join Cheddar! :) pls pls pls ☆ Take a poll! ☆ shh... secret easter eggs!☆
by Lord Dominator » Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:37 pm
by Awesomeland012345 » Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:39 pm
☆ All hail the Holy Awesomeness of Awesomeland012345! ☆ Cheddar ☆
☆ The founder and delegate of Cheddar ☆ Dispatches ☆ alllll haiillll the tunaaaa ☆ Become a dual citizen today! ☆ Join Cheddar! :) pls pls pls ☆ Take a poll! ☆ shh... secret easter eggs!☆
by Lord Dominator » Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:45 pm
Awesomeland012345 wrote:Lord Dominator wrote:There are no WA rules (outside of the game rules, but those are very different). GA follows GA rules and SC follows SC rules.
OK... Now I'm confused. Are those rules in the link the rules for writing WA proposals? And the SC doesn't follow those rules, only the GA follows those rules?
by Awesomeland012345 » Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:46 pm
Lord Dominator wrote:Awesomeland012345 wrote:
OK... Now I'm confused. Are those rules in the link the rules for writing WA proposals? And the SC doesn't follow those rules, only the GA follows those rules?
These are the GA rules, which only the GA follows. These are the SC rules, which only the SC follows.
☆ All hail the Holy Awesomeness of Awesomeland012345! ☆ Cheddar ☆
☆ The founder and delegate of Cheddar ☆ Dispatches ☆ alllll haiillll the tunaaaa ☆ Become a dual citizen today! ☆ Join Cheddar! :) pls pls pls ☆ Take a poll! ☆ shh... secret easter eggs!☆
by Lord Dominator » Wed Feb 26, 2020 10:04 pm
by The Unified Missourtama States » Mon Apr 06, 2020 8:19 am
Sedgistan wrote:Rule 4 update - "feeder" and "sinker"
After discussion amongst the team, we've decided that the terms "feeder" and sinker" are now compliant with Rule 4, and as such can be used within Security Council proposals.
Rule 4 is intended to ensure that Security Council proposals make sense in terms of the NS world. While "feeder" and "sinker" would not make sense as real-world terms, they do within NationStates. This is due to the nature of the game, which sees nations created in a specific set of regions, restored in another set of regions, and ejected to a specific region - it is understandable that within the NationStates world, unique terms would exist to refer to these regions.
by Dorab » Tue Apr 14, 2020 7:57 am
by Morover » Tue Apr 14, 2020 8:13 am
Dorab wrote:I am thinking about drafting up a commendtion and am not quite sure where to start. Should I make a thread saying I am going to commend X and want to include A, B, and C. Or should I have a first draft by the time I come to the forum?
by Dorab » Tue Apr 14, 2020 8:19 am
Morover wrote:Dorab wrote:I am thinking about drafting up a commendtion and am not quite sure where to start. Should I make a thread saying I am going to commend X and want to include A, B, and C. Or should I have a first draft by the time I come to the forum?
You should pretty much have some semblance of a draft ready when you post here. It's hard to give feedback (which is the biggest reason for drafting) when there's nothing to give feedback on.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement