I feel like this a wide open door for authors!
Advertisement
by Unibot III » Thu Sep 07, 2023 5:26 am
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Improper Classifications » Thu Sep 07, 2023 12:18 pm
by Ostrovskiy » Thu Sep 07, 2023 2:27 pm
Improper Classifications wrote:Is there any support left for a repeal of TBH's original Condemnation (SC#52)?
by Improper Classifications » Thu Sep 07, 2023 5:23 pm
by Ostrovskiy » Thu Sep 07, 2023 5:25 pm
by Improper Classifications » Thu Sep 07, 2023 5:56 pm
by The Ambis » Thu Sep 07, 2023 6:25 pm
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Thu Sep 07, 2023 11:34 pm
Improper Classifications wrote:Is there any support left for a repeal of TBH's original Condemnation (SC#52)?
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Honeydewistania » Thu Sep 07, 2023 11:44 pm
Improper Classifications wrote:Is there any support left for a repeal of TBH's original Condemnation (SC#52)?
Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass
by Improper Classifications » Fri Sep 08, 2023 10:02 am
by Lenlyvit » Fri Sep 08, 2023 12:32 pm
Improper Classifications wrote:...Huh. I didn't think the defender bloc would be against repealing a garbage unnecessary resolution from 12 years ago that's also a raider condemn
by Sporaltryus » Fri Sep 08, 2023 1:13 pm
Lenlyvit wrote:More than likely you'll get support from TL/C, and maybe TSP?
by Ostrovskiy » Fri Sep 08, 2023 2:26 pm
Improper Classifications wrote:...Huh. I didn't think the defender bloc would be against repealing a garbage unnecessary resolution from 12 years ago that's also a raider condemn
by Free Social Conservatives » Tue Sep 12, 2023 8:29 pm
by Unibot III » Wed Sep 13, 2023 3:58 am
Free Social Conservatives wrote:I've been drafting a Declaration on the new F/S update (thx to Unibot for the suggestion). Is there anyone else, however, who has been working on said Declaration in the time since Unibot checked in on the subject?
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Free Social Conservatives » Wed Sep 13, 2023 4:18 pm
by Unibot III » Wed Sep 13, 2023 5:29 pm
Free Social Conservatives wrote:Thank you, Unibot. Its a very good proposal and I'd be excited to see something like it pass. However, I think there is a niche there. "On Frontiers" is an aggressive declaration stating various sanctions and guidelines for the new Frontier community, basically doing what the SC does best and making a lot of strongly-worded statements on the topic.
On the other hand, what I've been aiming for can be partially represented by this quote from the On Frontiers draft:
"Delighted to see the emergence of new regions which can spawn sentient life and complex governments within them,"
and expanding it into a proposal declaring the fresh, new state of the multiverse and how F/S has changed many things. Or how now that Strongholds exist, nations now have the option to be invincible. etc etc
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Lets Solve Racism » Tue Sep 26, 2023 9:19 pm
Eternal Algerstonia wrote:declaration against racism
by Eternal Algerstonia » Tue Sep 26, 2023 9:30 pm
by Refuge Isle » Sat Oct 07, 2023 11:57 am
by Omnicontrol » Sat Oct 07, 2023 12:01 pm
United Calanworie wrote:It only is "absent" in F7 because nobody previews their posts because they're trying to move at the speed of mach fuck to not get ninjd.
Reventus Koth wrote:you're right guys my bad the next time i write a treaty i'll make sure to leave the possibility of raiding the other signatory on the table
Mlakhavia wrote:TCB arent fascists, we are simply the People
the People have a Stick
We use it to Whack piddly rightist frontiers
United Calanworie wrote:Us mods don't do shit.
[violet] wrote:lol
United Calanworie wrote:what in tarnation
by The Ice States » Sat Oct 07, 2023 7:19 pm
Omnicontrol wrote:Is anyone on The Ice States' C/C or am I free to do that one? Don't wanna try and write something only to find out there are people already doing it better than me
by Omnicontrol » Sun Oct 08, 2023 1:17 am
The Ice States wrote:Omnicontrol wrote:Is anyone on The Ice States' C/C or am I free to do that one? Don't wanna try and write something only to find out there are people already doing it better than me
I can confirm that a player is already working on such a draft and has received my permission to do so.
United Calanworie wrote:It only is "absent" in F7 because nobody previews their posts because they're trying to move at the speed of mach fuck to not get ninjd.
Reventus Koth wrote:you're right guys my bad the next time i write a treaty i'll make sure to leave the possibility of raiding the other signatory on the table
Mlakhavia wrote:TCB arent fascists, we are simply the People
the People have a Stick
We use it to Whack piddly rightist frontiers
United Calanworie wrote:Us mods don't do shit.
[violet] wrote:lol
United Calanworie wrote:what in tarnation
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Amara Coast, Plan Neonie
Advertisement