by Neo Danzig » Thu Feb 09, 2017 4:31 pm
by Cerian Quilor » Thu Feb 09, 2017 4:37 pm
by Tinhampton » Thu Feb 09, 2017 4:38 pm
by Neo Danzig » Thu Feb 09, 2017 4:39 pm
Cerian Quilor wrote:Are you using the original author's draft with permission? And I believe the rules say you cannot redo the exact same proposal.
by Neo Danzig » Thu Feb 09, 2017 4:39 pm
Tinhampton wrote:To re-iterate CQ, do you have permission from Canton to do this? (I would also like to draw your attention to other Islamic-themed regions colonised by EROGC: Allah, Allahu Akbar, Islamic Union of Free States, Free Commonwealth of Islam.)
by Sygian II » Thu Feb 09, 2017 4:59 pm
Benevolent Thomas wrote:The Black Hawks continue to be the largest and most successful invader organization in NationStates
by Drop Your Pants » Thu Feb 09, 2017 4:59 pm
by Tinhampton » Thu Feb 09, 2017 5:06 pm
by Neo Danzig » Thu Feb 09, 2017 5:19 pm
Sygian II wrote:What makes you think this will pass this time?
Looks like a fresh case of badge hunting to me.
by Neo Danzig » Thu Feb 09, 2017 5:20 pm
Tinhampton wrote:As for the Communists, based on EROGC embassies, I am at least aware of The Revolutionary Council and Viet Cong.
by Sygian II » Thu Feb 09, 2017 5:22 pm
We hope to improve the resolution, therefore swaying more voters.
Benevolent Thomas wrote:The Black Hawks continue to be the largest and most successful invader organization in NationStates
by Drop Your Pants » Thu Feb 09, 2017 5:25 pm
Tinhampton wrote:As for the Communists, based on EROGC embassies, I am at least aware of The Revolutionary Council and Viet Cong.
Noting Elite Region of Global Command's invasions of Islamya, The Arab League, Allah, Allahu Akbar, Islamic Union of Free States, and Free Commonwealth of Islam;
by Neo Danzig » Thu Feb 09, 2017 5:34 pm
Sygian II wrote:Once again...
Cool, you raided a couple of regions? Not condemnable.
You're a Nazi? Shouldn't be acknowledged by the Security Council again.We hope to improve the resolution, therefore swaying more voters.
The resolution looks about the exact same as its predecessor. I'm sure people know already how they're going to vote this time.
Just stop. There are so many other nations and regions out there that actually are deserving of a condemnation. Stop wasting your time on this proposal, because it's wasting ours.
by Cerian Quilor » Thu Feb 09, 2017 5:36 pm
Neo Danzig wrote:Sygian II wrote:What makes you think this will pass this time?
Looks like a fresh case of badge hunting to me.
Easy. We hope to improve the resolution, therefore swaying more voters. Additionally, the Delegate of the East Pacific, Aelitia didn't vote, since they didn't become delegate until the end of the vote. If they had voted, they would've voted for the resolution, since they were the one who told Todd McCloud, the previous delegate to vote for it. If Aelitia had voted, the resolution would've had enough votes to pass.
by The Atlae Isles » Thu Feb 09, 2017 5:38 pm
Neo Danzig wrote:Sygian II wrote:What makes you think this will pass this time?
Looks like a fresh case of badge hunting to me.
Easy. We hope to improve the resolution, therefore swaying more voters. Additionally, the Delegate of the East Pacific, Aelitia didn't vote, since they didn't become delegate until the end of the vote. If they had voted, they would've voted for the resolution, since they were the one who told Todd McCloud, the previous delegate to vote for it. If Aelitia had voted, the resolution would've had enough votes to pass.
by Neo Danzig » Thu Feb 09, 2017 5:39 pm
Cerian Quilor wrote:Neo Danzig wrote:Easy. We hope to improve the resolution, therefore swaying more voters. Additionally, the Delegate of the East Pacific, Aelitia didn't vote, since they didn't become delegate until the end of the vote. If they had voted, they would've voted for the resolution, since they were the one who told Todd McCloud, the previous delegate to vote for it. If Aelitia had voted, the resolution would've had enough votes to pass.
Why are these people in such urgent need of a condemnation. Let them actually do something terrible before you waste this council's time again[ on this mindlessness.
by Neo Danzig » Thu Feb 09, 2017 5:39 pm
The Atlae Isles wrote:Neo Danzig wrote:Easy. We hope to improve the resolution, therefore swaying more voters. Additionally, the Delegate of the East Pacific, Aelitia didn't vote, since they didn't become delegate until the end of the vote. If they had voted, they would've voted for the resolution, since they were the one who told Todd McCloud, the previous delegate to vote for it. If Aelitia had voted, the resolution would've had enough votes to pass.
Actually, it would almost be enough.
Additionally, putting another resolution in like this would be terrible.
by Neo Danzig » Thu Feb 09, 2017 5:40 pm
The Atlae Isles wrote:Neo Danzig wrote:Easy. We hope to improve the resolution, therefore swaying more voters. Additionally, the Delegate of the East Pacific, Aelitia didn't vote, since they didn't become delegate until the end of the vote. If they had voted, they would've voted for the resolution, since they were the one who told Todd McCloud, the previous delegate to vote for it. If Aelitia had voted, the resolution would've had enough votes to pass.
Actually, it would almost be enough.
Additionally, putting another resolution in like this would be terrible.
by The Atlae Isles » Thu Feb 09, 2017 5:42 pm
by Cerian Quilor » Thu Feb 09, 2017 5:48 pm
Neo Danzig wrote:Sygian II wrote:Once again...
Cool, you raided a couple of regions? Not condemnable.
You're a Nazi? Shouldn't be acknowledged by the Security Council again.
The resolution looks about the exact same as its predecessor. I'm sure people know already how they're going to vote this time.
Just stop. There are so many other nations and regions out there that actually are deserving of a condemnation. Stop wasting your time on this proposal, because it's wasting ours.
1) Really? Raiding regions isn't condemnable. That's pretty funny, because pretty much every condemnation has to do with raiding.
2) Whether or not Nazis should be recognized by the Security Council should be left up to the Council itself. Let them determine that by voting.
5) I would argue that its not a waste of time. That's up to the Council to decide. If this is actually going to get to vote, 99 delegates need to say it's worth their time. If it's not and you're right, then it won't come to vote, and therefore won't waste anyone's time but mine.
by Neo Danzig » Thu Feb 09, 2017 5:51 pm
The Atlae Isles wrote:When it failed, Aelitia had enough votes to lessen the margin by 1 vote.
It would be terrible because 1) no one wants to see the same resolution again 2) you're giving ERoGC more attention, and 3) if I remember, you're a huge CAIN opponent. And ERoGC doesn't like CAIN either.
by Neo Danzig » Thu Feb 09, 2017 5:59 pm
Cerian Quilor wrote:Neo Danzig wrote:
1) Really? Raiding regions isn't condemnable. That's pretty funny, because pretty much every condemnation has to do with raiding.
Raiding alone is not. Being good at raiding and destroying lots of meaningful communities is. The Black Hawks, Macedon, etc, they had to earn their condemnations.2) Whether or not Nazis should be recognized by the Security Council should be left up to the Council itself. Let them determine that by voting.
The security council voting population are largely people who have no idea of context or what condemnations actually do. And we really shouldn't hold up the will of such an inconstant collection of misinformed sheep as gospel. Else repeals shouldn't be allowed.5) I would argue that its not a waste of time. That's up to the Council to decide. If this is actually going to get to vote, 99 delegates need to say it's worth their time. If it's not and you're right, then it won't come to vote, and therefore won't waste anyone's time but mine.
Getting 99 or whatever delegates to approve this will be a piece of cake. It says 'NAZIS BAD' in big bold letters. It's the resolution equivalent of free cake.
by Drop Your Pants » Thu Feb 09, 2017 6:03 pm
by Neo Danzig » Thu Feb 09, 2017 6:06 pm
Drop Your Pants wrote:So i notice you've edited the proposal to change the broken region link but not replied to any of my other points on the regions they "invaded". Wonder if i'll have more luck talking to the co-author
Neo Danzig wrote:The Security Council,
Observing Elite Region of Global Command's targeting of communists and Muslims;
Noting Elite Region of Global Command's invasions, refounds, or both of Islamya, The Arab League, Allah, Allahu Akbar, Islamic Union of Free States, United Commonwealth of Islam, The Revolutionary Council, and Viet Cong;
Detesting Elite Region of Global Command's hatred and bigotry;
Disgusted by Elite Region of Global Command's various nicknames for Muslims, such as "muzzies";
Further disgusted that Elite Region of Global Command calls Islam "Frankenstein";
Disturbed by Elite Region of Global Command's calls for the annihilation of communists and Muslims;
Alarmed by Elite Region of Global Command's proud proclamation of "Glory to Nazism" in their World Factbook Entry;
Recognizing Nazism as an intolerant ideology promoting racism;
Hereby condemns Elite Region of Global Command.
Co-Authored by Canton Empire
Edit 1: Added more of EROGC's invasions.
Edit 2: Same as above.
Edit 3: Fixed some inaccuracies and small mistakes.
by Drop Your Pants » Thu Feb 09, 2017 6:10 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement