I am simply asking the GCRs to support it, with only 1 message. The rest is just general conversation. If it was banned, I would not have done it.
Advertisement
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Sun Jan 22, 2017 3:08 pm
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Benjabobaria » Sun Jan 22, 2017 3:10 pm
Zizou wrote:it's the natives fault for getting beat the fuck up by raiders because the founder cted or they were dumb enough to make the del exec
Altino wrote:The number of "Benja this is amazing, I love it!!!" conversations and also "Benja wtf were you thinking, you're ruining my life" conversations we've had go so hard.
by TUDB Indo » Sun Jan 22, 2017 3:13 pm
Benjabobaria wrote:The CAIN is a terrorist organization that needs to be wiped off of NS. Destroying groups of people whose culture you don't like is essentially Nazism. However the CAIN is not one region so SC resolutions against them are meaningless.
by Indo-Malaysia » Sun Jan 22, 2017 4:09 pm
by Caelapes » Sun Jan 22, 2017 4:17 pm
Indo-Malaysia wrote:I think the proposal is good, since it has 41 Approvals.
by Indo-Malaysia » Sun Jan 22, 2017 4:20 pm
by Abbas Khan » Sun Jan 22, 2017 4:24 pm
Indo-Malaysia wrote:Caelapes wrote:That's pretty far short of how many it needs to make it to vote, and delegate approvals are a dime a dozen - if that's your barometer of a "good proposal," I'd hate to see your idea of a bad one.
The only idea I have of bad ones are the ones that occasionally get discarded by the mods.
by Kaboomlandia » Sun Jan 22, 2017 4:25 pm
Indo-Malaysia wrote:Caelapes wrote:That's pretty far short of how many it needs to make it to vote, and delegate approvals are a dime a dozen - if that's your barometer of a "good proposal," I'd hate to see your idea of a bad one.
The only idea I have of bad ones are the ones that occasionally get discarded by the mods.
by Brunhizzle » Sun Jan 22, 2017 7:44 pm
Abbas Khan wrote:XD pedantics, Brun.
by Abbas Khan » Sun Jan 22, 2017 7:54 pm
by LollerLand » Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:38 pm
Malphe wrote:I don't know why you think that people will want to condemn CAIN this time, as opposed to last time. All the same points are made as with the last proposal, with an extra dose of obliviousness.
by Drittes Deutsches Reich » Mon Jan 23, 2017 12:13 am
"CAIN is devoted to combating antisemitism, racism, and persecution of the LGBT community."
by Novyy Balans » Mon Jan 23, 2017 12:25 am
Drittes Deutsches Reich wrote:CAIN's dishonesty and hypocrisy are mind blowing...
Excerpt from their telegram urging people not to support this resolution:"CAIN is devoted to combating antisemitism, racism, and persecution of the LGBT community."
Absolute and utter bullshit. CAIN is not devoted to fighting neither anti-Semitism, nor racism, nor persecution of the LGBT community. CAIN is devoted to using these as excuses, but not to actually opposing them.
What CAIN actually opposes is any region referencing German 19th/20th-century history, or using the symbolism of the German state at that time. That is all; CAIN opposes symbols, not attitudes. For them, racism, persecution of the LGBT community et al. are only ever "bad" when the people doing them 1) explicitly call themselves "Nazis" (whether they actually are Nazis matters not), or 2) explicitly associate themselves with anything German.
All of this is incredibly easy to prove. How the hell can anyone take these clowns seriously on their claim that they "oppose racism" when they HAVE NOT EVEN MENTIONED ANY OF THE ALT-RIGHT, WHITE-NATIONALIST REGIONS, of which there are MANY, MANY MORE THAN THERE ARE NAZI REGIONS? Their hypocrisy is so damn obvious, people. Yes, fighting Nazism is noble, but you know what's even better? Fighting racism NO MATTER WHAT COUNTRY'S BANNERS THE RACISTS CHOOSE TO GATHER UNDER, AND NO MATTER WHAT THEY CHOOSE TO CALL THEMSELVES.
CAIN needs to either stop advertising themselves as what they are not, and keep doing what they're doing; or they can actually take their own claims to heart and CHANGE THEIR POLICY TO ACTUALLY REFLECT WHAT THEY CLAIM THEY ARE DOING. Anything else is dishonest, hypocritical, and hence worthy of condemnation.
by Drittes Deutsches Reich » Mon Jan 23, 2017 12:28 am
Novyy Balans wrote:Drittes Deutsches Reich wrote:CAIN's dishonesty and hypocrisy are mind blowing...
Excerpt from their telegram urging people not to support this resolution:
Absolute and utter bullshit. CAIN is not devoted to fighting neither anti-Semitism, nor racism, nor persecution of the LGBT community. CAIN is devoted to using these as excuses, but not to actually opposing them.
What CAIN actually opposes is any region referencing German 19th/20th-century history, or using the symbolism of the German state at that time. That is all; CAIN opposes symbols, not attitudes. For them, racism, persecution of the LGBT community et al. are only ever "bad" when the people doing them 1) explicitly call themselves "Nazis" (whether they actually are Nazis matters not), or 2) explicitly associate themselves with anything German.
All of this is incredibly easy to prove. How the hell can anyone take these clowns seriously on their claim that they "oppose racism" when they HAVE NOT EVEN MENTIONED ANY OF THE ALT-RIGHT, WHITE-NATIONALIST REGIONS, of which there are MANY, MANY MORE THAN THERE ARE NAZI REGIONS? Their hypocrisy is so damn obvious, people. Yes, fighting Nazism is noble, but you know what's even better? Fighting racism NO MATTER WHAT COUNTRY'S BANNERS THE RACISTS CHOOSE TO GATHER UNDER, AND NO MATTER WHAT THEY CHOOSE TO CALL THEMSELVES.
CAIN needs to either stop advertising themselves as what they are not, and keep doing what they're doing; or they can actually take their own claims to heart and CHANGE THEIR POLICY TO ACTUALLY REFLECT WHAT THEY CLAIM THEY ARE DOING. Anything else is dishonest, hypocritical, and hence worthy of condemnation.
Totally off-topic, but how on earth can you be a nazi and be pro-immigration and anti-homophobia? If I remember correctly, Mr. Hitler was pretty much the exact opposite.
by Klaus Devestatorie » Mon Jan 23, 2017 6:17 am
by Drittes Deutsches Reich » Mon Jan 23, 2017 9:31 am
Klaus Devestatorie wrote:This is a good proposal, but the membership of CAIN alone has the numbers to defeat it should it come to a vote.
by Crazy girl » Mon Jan 23, 2017 12:52 pm
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:19 pm
Crazy girl wrote:The submitted proposal (which is different from the one in the OP of this thread) contained a rule 4 violation and has been removed.
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Indo-Malaysia » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:58 pm
by Lands of Anarchy » Mon Jan 23, 2017 3:57 pm
Indo-Malaysia wrote:Welp, here goesDismayed at the aggressive libel performed by The CAIN towards KAISERREICH, falsely portraying it as a Nazi Region
Abhorred at CAIN's attempted raids of Femdom Empire
Discontent that the 'evidence' provided by CAIN about the aforementioned regions consists of dated records and past leaders even denounced by those very regions
Further Dismayed at the labelling of regions which have established embassies of such regions as 'Nazi Collaborators' without any regard for such regions
Horrified that CAIN has smeared the reputations of almost a hundred regions by denouncing them through their liberally usage of the terms 'Nazi Region' and 'Nazi Collaborator
Infuriated that many regions have suffered as a result of the aforementioned slander
Bewildered as to why a region would be labelled as a Nazi Collaborator solely for having established embassies with supposed 'Nazi Regions'
Denunciating this activity for being counterproductive to the Anti-Nazi movement
Concerned that CAIN's liberal use of the label "Nazi" will render the term meaningless
Affirmative that the condemnation of The CAIN is necessary towards a long-term effort to cease the liberal labelling and aggressive campaign for regions to break ties with such labelled regions
Yearning that the condemnation will lead to signatories realising the blatant flaws and potentially reform the CAIN or create a new, more exemplary and meticulous organisation to truly suppress the Nazi Ideology as opposed to targeting regions based on outdated 'evidence' and embassies
The Resolution hereby condemns The CAIN
by Anarcha Feminist Gynarchy » Mon Jan 23, 2017 5:04 pm
Lands of Anarchy wrote:Would just like to point out (in case you missed it on the rmb) that Femdom Empire was anti-CAIN before CAIN started raiding it, hence the raids on it by CAIN.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement