[DRAFT] Condemn Mikeswill

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.


Remove ads

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
Posts: 8435
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Tue Dec 20, 2016 11:41 am

We probably ought not set the precedent of condemning people for their political views vis-à-vis the Security Council. Seems rather rash and unthoughtful. In fact, it would basically be like condemning Europe for not voting in Security Council resolutions. It's the right and prerogative of any player to vote how they wish. We should condemn people for actions, not for beliefs.

Author: 1 SC and 26 GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
Delegate for Europe
Out-of-character unless marked otherwise
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate

User avatar
States of Glory
Posts: 589
Founded: Jul 28, 2014
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby States of Glory » Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:57 pm

Escape from Trump wrote:I don't think you can condemn someone for disagreeing with you.

I disagree. Condemn me!
Make America Great Britain Again!
TWP's Minister for WA Affairs

User avatar
Posts: 2996
Founded: Apr 10, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby Consular » Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:14 pm

Mikeswill should be condemned for shamelessly reposting the same irksome statement on every single SC proposal.

User avatar
Posts: 169
Founded: Antiquity
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Mikeswill » Thu Dec 22, 2016 10:32 pm

Consular wrote:Mikeswill should be condemned for shamelessly reposting the same irksome statement on every single SC proposal.

Yeah Buddy!
Love Conquers Fear

User avatar
Sygian II
Posts: 534
Founded: Jun 14, 2016

Postby Sygian II » Fri Dec 23, 2016 10:18 pm

I leave for a day and come back to see that this still exists. THE IRONY!
Benevolent Thomas wrote:The Black Hawks continue to be the largest and most successful invader organization in NationStates

Maj. Sygian

Council Advisor of The Black Hawks

User avatar
Posts: 102
Founded: Jul 21, 2004
New York Times Democracy

Postby Naginii » Fri Jan 06, 2017 2:19 pm

A body dedicated to "freedom" (and all the freedoms wrapped-up in that loaded word) wants to condemn a nation for it's speech, it's ideas, it's expression — about this very group.

So, in the WASC we're all for freedom of speech, etc. so long as it isn't about the WASC.

Animal Farm much?
Last edited by Naginii on Fri Jan 06, 2017 2:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
The Wiganese Islands
Political Columnist
Posts: 2
Founded: Jul 21, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Wiganese Islands » Thu Jan 17, 2019 3:16 pm

I agree with this because, while I was inactive, he sent me 2 telegrams telling me to endorse him, so I endorsed him, withdrew it, changed my flag to I will not endorse mikeswill and got banned. Then I got banned from the Invaders.
The Highlander 1 turned out to be mikeswill, and he banned me, so we went to the north pacific!

He should be condemned!

User avatar
Game Moderator
Posts: 5630
Founded: Oct 17, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ransium » Thu Jan 17, 2019 3:26 pm

Don’t gravedig old threads. If OP wants to resume drafting, they can make a request in moderation to have this thread unlocked.

Commended by SC 236,
WA Delegate of Forest since March 20th, 2007.
Author of WA Resolutions: SC 221, SC 224, SC 233, SC 243, SC 265, GA 403, GA 439, GA 445.
Issues Editor since January 20th, 2017.
Author of 21 issues. First editor of 43.
Forum Moderator since November 10th, 2017. Game Moderator since March 15th, 2018.



Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Jommes di Kimamwue


Remove ads