The Second Moon Rising wrote:Aimdar-Goomdar wrote: They've already expressed dismay on their Regional Message BoardAimdar-Goomdar wrote:The outrage and dismay is present in the objective of the posts, not the posts themselves.
The Riser delegate tilts its head. "There is no dismay being expressed. There is no outrage and dismay present 'in the objective of the posts'. There is only the antics of some very specially-challenged individuals who have decided to make a minor mess in a very cleanable area, and a few curious nations that have arrived to spectate; in fact, not one of the nations that have spoken on the RMB are natives. At the best, the Founder's apparent lack of action is the wisdom of patience and simply waiting for these specially-challenged individuals to become bored and move on before spending a few minutes to clean the mess. In the medium, the Founder has an accord with the 'raiders' and their occupation is consensual, hence why the Founder has both endorsed the 'raiders' and not ejected them. At the worst, the Founder is indeed indifferent as there has been no lasting complaints from the natives made to the Founder and the 'raiders' remain specially-challenged individuals by virtue of attempting to take over a Region that has an active Founder that can eject them regardless of Delegate status with the flick of a finger when finally annoyed enough."
"Unless the Founder ceases to exist and leaves the Region founderless, there is no need to liberate. As the Founder is still active, the Region is much safer in its current state than it would be if the Security Council interfered."
So, are you saying that if the Founder supports an invading force, than the region as a whole, even if the Founder Ceases to Exist, the region is under no threat as long as it's occupied by that invading force, no matter the natives' opinions with or without the Founder?