Page 1 of 1

On Commendations and Condemnations

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 5:39 am
by The Marsupial Illuminati
On Commendations and Condemnations

>>> Dispatch Link <<<


ImageImage


Let's begin with the three arguments for C&Cs listed by Sedgistan in the Guide to the Security Council:

  • The Security Council should recognise those whose actions align with the principles of the World Assembly.
  • The Security Council should acknowledge those who have a significant/unique impact on NationStates.
  • The nominee’s actions need to be immortalized for future generations to learn from.
Such criteria is general, and therefore, other reasons and specifics are needed:

Reasons Why Nations/Regions Were Commended In the Past
Reason for Commendation
Commendations
Leadership in Regional or Organizational Government/Region and Community Building
  1. Kandarin
  2. Goobergunchia
  3. Todd McCloud
  4. Sedgistan
  5. The Joint Systems Alliance
  6. 10000 Islands (SC #30)
  7. Ananke II
  8. Texas (SC #40)
  9. Crazy girl
  10. Northern Chittowa
  11. Fudgetopia
  12. Mikeswill
  13. Wysteria
  14. Ballotonia
  15. Naivetry
  16. Unibot II
  17. A mean old man
  18. Warzone Codger
  19. Topid
  20. Krulltopia
  21. A Slanted Black Stripe
  22. Mousebumples
  23. Luna Amore (SC #123)
  24. The Bruce
  25. Sanctaria
  26. Harmoneia
  27. Eluvatar
  28. NewTexas
  29. Abacathea
  30. Anime Daisuki
  31. 1 Infinite Loop
  32. Hobbesistan
  33. Astarial
  34. McMasterdonia
  35. Improving Wordiness
  36. TAO the Watcher
  37. Westwind
  38. Evil Wolf
  39. Luna Amore (SC #170)
  40. Forever Fields
  41. Renegade Islands Alliance
  42. Sciongrad
  43. Flemingovia
  44. Dyr Nasad
  45. Hell
  46. Renaissancistic People
  47. Forest
  48. Yggdrasil
  49. Imperium Anglorum
  50. Drasnia
  51. August
  52. Wopruthien
  53. Zwangzug
  54. Europeia
  55. Ransium
  56. The Macabees
  57. Tsunamy
  58. The MT Army
  59. Texas (SC #242)
Defending
  1. 10000 Islands (SC #5)
  2. Goobergunchia
  3. 10000 Islands (SC #30)
  4. Todd McCloud
  5. Sedgistan
  6. Ananke II
  7. Texas (SC #40)
  8. Crazy girl
  9. Northern Chittowa
  10. Ballotonia
  11. Naivetry
  12. Unibot II
  13. The Bruce
  14. Harmoneia
  15. Eluvatar
  16. NewTexas
  17. Anime Daisuki
  18. Hobbesistan
  19. Astarial
  20. Improving Wordiness
  21. Westwind
  22. Renegade Islands Alliance
  23. The Red Fleet
  24. Dyr Nasad
  25. Yggdrasil
  26. August
  27. Wopruthien
  28. Zwangzug
  29. Texas (SC #242)
  30. Wintony
Raiding
  1. Todd McCloud
  2. The Skeleton Army
  3. Evil Wolf
  4. The Red Fleet
  5. August
  6. Europeia
  7. The MT Army
Role-Playing
  1. Todd McCloud
  2. Antarctic Oasis
  3. The Joint Systems Alliance
  4. Bergnovinaia
  5. Starblaydia
  6. Commerce Heights
  7. Lamoni
  8. Bears Armed
  9. Yohannes
  10. Separatist Peoples
  11. Forest
  12. Yggdrasil
  13. Zwangzug
  14. The Macabees
  15. Alasdair I Frosticus
NS Stats
  1. Fudgetopia
  2. Wysteria
  3. SkyDip
  4. Luna Amore (SC #123)
  5. Bears Armed
  6. Forest
  7. Ransium
Being Delegate for an Extended Period of Time
  1. Fudgetopia
  2. Mikeswill
  3. Warzone Codger
  4. Krulltopia
  5. McMasterdonia
  6. Westwind
  7. Renaissancistic People
  8. Ransium
  9. Tsunamy
UN/WA Authorship/Drafting/Campaigning
  1. Goobergunchia
  2. Todd McCloud
  3. Sedgistan
  4. Antarctic Oasis
  5. Sionis Prioratus
  6. Bergnovinaia
  7. Texas (SC #40)
  8. The Cat-Tribe
  9. Glen-Rhodes
  10. A mean old man
  11. Unibot II
  12. Topid
  13. SkyDip
  14. Mousebumples
  15. Luna Amore (SC #123)
  16. Bears Armed
  17. Sanctaria
  18. Abacathea
  19. Anime Daisuki
  20. McMasterdonia
  21. Luna Amore (SC #170)
  22. Forever Fields
  23. Sciongrad
  24. Separatist Peoples
  25. Renaissancistic People
  26. Forest
  27. Yggdrasil
  28. Imperium Anglorum
  29. Europeia
  30. Ransium
  31. Texas (SC #242)
Issues Authorship/Drafting
  1. Sanctaria
  2. Nation of Quebec
  3. Forest
  4. Drasnia
  5. Zwangzug
  6. Candlewhisper Archive
  7. Ransium
Compiling or Discovering Information/Creating Wikis
  1. Goobergunchia
  2. Todd McCloud
  3. Ballotonia
  4. Luna Amore (SC #123)
  5. The Bruce
  6. Renaissancistic People
  7. Imperium Anglorum
  8. Drasnia
  9. Zwangzug
  10. Europeia
  11. The Macabees
Creating Flags
  1. Imagey Nation
  2. Tiago Silva
Travelling Between Regions
  1. The Quote of the Day
  2. Travelling Region
  3. The Featured Region Followers
Scholarly Works
  1. Unibot II
  2. Mousebumples
  3. Renaissancistic People
  4. Europeia
  5. The Macabees
Excelling in NS-Wide Events
  1. The NationStates Community
  2. August
Creation of Tools
  1. Eluvatar
  2. Texas (SC #40)
  3. Commerce Heights
  4. Glen-Rhodes
  5. NewTexas
  6. Hobbesistan
  7. Renegade Islands Alliance
  8. Imperium Anglorum
  9. Europeia
Composing Poetry
  1. Haiku
Excellent Debater in the GA
  1. The Cat-Tribe
  2. Glen-Rhodes
Translating Mottoes Into Latin
  1. Naivetry
Creating Gameplay Ideologies/Philosophies
  1. Renaissancistic People
  2. Europeia
Excellent Debater in the General Forum
  1. The Cat-Tribe
  2. Alasdair I Frosticus





Reasons Why Nations/Regions Were Condemned In the Past
Reason for Condemnation
Condemnations
Raiding/Griefing/Couping/Region Destruction
  1. Macedon
  2. Durkadurkiranistan II
  3. NAZI EUROPE (SC #37)
  4. The Black Hawks (SC #52)
  5. The Greater German Reich
  6. Lone Wolves United
  7. The Black Riders (SC #91)
  8. Yauna
  9. Jakker
  10. Aglrinia
  11. Mallorea and Riva
  12. Gest
  13. The Black Riders (SC #127)
  14. The Dourian Embassy
  15. North Korea
  16. General Halcones
  17. Stujenske
  18. The Pacific
  19. DEN (SC #187)
  20. Vandoosa
  21. DEN (SC #192)
  22. Kknight
  23. The Black Hawks (SC #217)
  24. Canterlot
  25. Reventus Koth
Hateful Regional Ideology
  1. Macedon
  2. NAZI EUROPE (SC #3)
  3. NAZI EUROPE (SC #37)
  4. North Korea
Forum Destruction
  1. Unknown
  2. Allied States of EuroIslanders
Passing/Repealing GA Legislation
  1. The Dourian Embassy
  2. Wrapper
Role-Playing as an Evil Nation
  1. Omigodtheykilledkenny
  2. Greater Tezdrian
  3. Great Nepal
  4. Der Fuhrer Dyszel
  5. NAZI EUROPE (SC #37)
  6. Kalasparata
  7. Swarmlandia
  8. Blackhelm Confederacy
  9. The Kraven Corporation
  10. Milograd (SC #77)
  11. Anthony Delasanta
  12. Automagfreek
  13. Milograd (SC #97)
  14. Ralkovia
  15. Hippostania
  16. Aglrinia
  17. Wrapper
Violating GA Legislation
  1. Omigodtheykilledkenny
  2. Greater Tezdrian
  3. Great Nepal
  4. Anthony Delasanta
  5. Hippostania
Horrible Leadership of a Region
  1. Durkadurkiranistan II
  2. Sedgistan
  3. Punk Reloaded
  4. Thatcherton
  5. Anthony Delasanta
  6. The Dourian Embassy
  7. North Korea
  8. Stujenske
  9. The Pacific
  10. Vandoosa
  11. Reventus Koth
  12. Wrapper
Gaming/Improperly Using the SC
  1. NAZI EUROPE (SC #37)
  2. The Black Hawks (SC #52)
  3. The Dourian Embassy
  4. The Black Hawks (SC #217)
Being a Puppet Storage Region
  1. Ninja Pirate awesome town
  2. True North
Creation of Tools
  1. The Black Riders (SC #127)
Region Composed of Condemned Entities
  1. DEN (SC #187)
  2. The Black Hawks (SC #217)
Creating Events
  1. The Black Hawks (SC #217)


Above is every single C&C categorized under an argument. Many C&Cs are listed under multiple arguments. Note that some resolutions here were repealed, proven false, would be illegal today, or are no longer considered to be commendable/condemnatory.

The purpose of this dispatch is to provide a reference with which nations participating in the SC can use to see what arguments have been used to justify a C&C, or to see what precedent is there for a particular argument in a C&C. I hope nations with questions such as "Can role-players be condemned?" or "Is this even condemnatory?" will have their questions answered after reading this reference on passed C&Cs. This is not to say that standards for a C&C should be set low, rather that they should not be ridiculously-high-that-no-one-has-been-condemned-or-commended-in-months high. This historical context should show that C&Cs are deserved by players today.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 6:12 am
by Sedgistan
Very helpful thread. It's now linked to from the Guide sticky.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 6:15 am
by Brunhizzle
Great list!

Just a point though, you mentioned 10KI island as a condemned "Impressive Issues Player" while linking a commendation.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 6:15 am
by Drawkland
I believe Commerce Heights should also be listed under "Creation of Tools" as well since his Commendation includes his creation of NSEconomy and xkoranate, two widely-used tools.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 6:23 am
by Troperia
What happens to a particular nation or region if it is condemned or commended?

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 6:24 am
by The Marsupial Illuminati
Sedgistan wrote:Very helpful thread. It's now linked to from the Guide sticky.

:)
Brunhizzle wrote:Great list!

Just a point though, you mentioned 10KI island as a condemned "Impressive Issues Player" while linking a commendation.

Thank you, and fixed.
Drawkland wrote:I believe Commerce Heights should also be listed under "Creation of Tools" as well since his Commendation includes his creation of NSEconomy and xkoranate, two widely-used tools.

I missed that, thanks. It's fixed now.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 7:03 am
by Wrapper
Nice job! :clap:

If you don't mind a miniscule bit of nitpicking from an uncredited co-author, Separatist Peoples' commendation, while focusing on WA authorship, included three paragraphs on his RP in the Strangers' Bar, so it should probably be listed under RP as well.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 7:42 am
by The Marsupial Illuminati
Wrapper wrote:Nice job! :clap:

If you don't mind a miniscule bit of nitpicking from an uncredited co-author, Separatist Peoples' commendation, while focusing on WA authorship, included three paragraphs on his RP in the Strangers' Bar, so it should probably be listed under RP as well.

Thanks. Separatist Peoples' commendation is now listed under role-play.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 8:06 am
by Tinhampton
For as long as the OP is here, will this list be updated with each new justification for receiving a badge?

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:54 am
by The Marsupial Illuminati
Tinhampton wrote:For as long as the OP is here, will this list be updated with each new justification for receiving a badge?

Yes, this list will be updated, as it is a reference for all future C&C proposals. If a passed C&C resolution were to have a unique argument not yet listed in this reference, then the added resolution will be listed under a new catergory.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 10:08 am
by Bhang Bhang Duc
Excellent piece of work, thank you.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 10:21 am
by Ever-Wandering Souls
Any odds of this being expanded with why commendations/condemnations have been repealed? a quick looks shows between 1 in 3 and 1 in 4 of those have been repealed (with condemns having a high rate than commends). Be interesting to also break down repeals, and maybe even look then at what the condemnations/commendations that have lasted have in common compared to those who have been repealed.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 10:25 am
by We Are Not the NSA
This is really cool, thanks for making this thread. :)

In the future, is there any possibility that you will be doing Liberations and Repeals as well?

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 10:43 am
by DrWinner
Horrible Leadership of a Region (Sedgistan, Punk Reloaded, Thatcherton, Anthony Delasanta, The Dourian Embassy, Stujenske, The Pacific)


Bolding and underlining is my own.

*Shots fired*

Might I suggest, as I am a member of the Pacific, that you re-read that condemnation there. It was issued more due to hatred of Pacifican leadership and the Lazarus affair, which better means that condemnation should be under raiding/briefing/coupling, rather than 'horrible leadership.'

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 12:58 pm
by Pergamon
DrWinner wrote:
Horrible Leadership of a Region (Sedgistan, Punk Reloaded, Thatcherton, Anthony Delasanta, The Dourian Embassy, Stujenske, The Pacific)


Bolding and underlining is my own.

*Shots fired*

Might I suggest, as I am a member of the Pacific, that you re-read that condemnation there. It was issued more due to hatred of Pacifican leadership and the Lazarus affair, which better means that condemnation should be under raiding/briefing/coupling, rather than 'horrible leadership.'


I agree. The Pacific was mainly condemned for Lazarus back then. - Bringing TP into the category of being condemned because of "Horrible Leadership" is not only not correct in a factual way, but also rather insulting and disappointing. The SC resolution was even repealed because it contained factual errors regarding the Pacific itself.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 1:00 pm
by Lynopia
Horrible Leadership of a Region (Sedgistan, Punk Reloaded, Thatcherton, Anthony Delasanta, The Dourian Embassy, Stujenske, The Pacific)
Usually, regions with horrible leadership do not enjoy stable government with a happy native population for thirteen and more years. :roll:

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 1:17 pm
by The city of love
.................... My suggestion to whoever wrote this post please fact check next time this white washing and slandering a region im happy to be in is not needed you should really be ashamed of yourself for that

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 1:44 pm
by We Are Not the NSA
Recognizing that the New Pacific Order (NPO), the regime that has ruled The Pacific for more than a decade, was founded by Francos Spain in 2003 after seizing the Delegacy of The Pacific from Thedoc with the support of invading forces, and has imposed dictatorship and tyranny on the native population of The Pacific ever since,

Rebuking the NPO, for its oppressive political nature, which has included institution of a ludicrously low limit on the free exchange of support between World Assembly nations throughout NPO history, and the severe suppression of any form of dissenting speech which calls into question the actions or legitimacy of the NPO, fostering a brutal police state in which the native population has no say in the affairs of their own region,

...

Asserting that the actions of the NPO against the native population of The Pacific and the communities of other regions constitute an affront to regional sovereignty, self-determination, and democratic governance, and to the interregional peace and goodwill that this institution is charged with upholding,

Urging the native nations of The Pacific to demand reform from the NPO, to bring an end to its domestic tyranny and foreign imperialism, so that one day The Pacific may reconcile with the interregional community and this condemnation will no longer be necessary,

DrWinner wrote:
Horrible Leadership of a Region (Sedgistan, Punk Reloaded, Thatcherton, Anthony Delasanta, The Dourian Embassy, Stujenske, The Pacific)


Bolding and underlining is my own.

*Shots fired*

Might I suggest, as I am a member of the Pacific, that you re-read that condemnation there. It was issued more due to hatred of Pacifican leadership and the Lazarus affair, which better means that condemnation should be under raiding/briefing/coupling, rather than 'horrible leadership.'

Pergamon wrote:I agree. The Pacific was mainly condemned for Lazarus back then. - Bringing TP into the category of being condemned because of "Horrible Leadership" is not only not correct in a factual way, but also rather insulting and disappointing. The SC resolution was even repealed because it contained factual errors regarding the Pacific itself.

Lynopia wrote:Usually, regions with horrible leadership do not enjoy stable government with a happy native population for thirteen and more years. :roll:

The city of love wrote:.................... My suggestion to whoever wrote this post please fact check next time this white washing and slandering a region im happy to be in is not needed you should really be ashamed of yourself for that

Guys, guys, let's chill for a minute. The OOC reason that TP was condemned was for the coup in Lazarus, and I agree with you that it should be moved, but just by analyzing the text you can see where TMI is coming from. IC the main argument for the condemnation was that the NPO was doing a poor job of running TP. TMI isn't passing judgement on TP, he read the resolution and interpreted its arguments. Honestly, it's kind of funny how personal you guys are making this.

SC #177 was a piece of legislature that was meant to be a criticism of the NPO, the "Leadership of [the] Region". Only a single clause mentioned Lazarus, and only 4 clauses were explicitly about coups or raids. SC #177 differed from most other coup/raid related condemnations in that instead of just saying "The Pacific is bad because they couped Lazarus..." it said "The Pacific is run by the NPO, and the NPO is bad because it decided to coup Lazarus..." Get it? According to the text of the resolution, The Pacific wasn't bad, it's leadership was.

And just a reminder, none of this is my opinion of TP or the NPO. It was the opinion of the WA (before the repeal), based on the text of the Condemnation. If you need a tl;dr of what my argument in this post was, it is basically that last sentence.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 1:24 am
by The Marsupial Illuminati
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Excellent piece of work, thank you.

We Are Not the NSA wrote:This is really cool, thanks for making this thread. :)

Thank you for the kind words.
We Are Not the NSA wrote:In the future, is there any possibility that you will be doing Liberations and Repeals as well?

The main purpose of this thread is to show players the historical precedence for the various arguments in C&Cs. However, I will do a list about Repeals of C&Cs in the future due to popular demand. As for Liberations, that is less likely as I have less interest in those resolutions.
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:Any odds of this being expanded with why commendations/condemnations have been repealed? a quick looks shows between 1 in 3 and 1 in 4 of those have been repealed (with condemns having a high rate than commends). Be interesting to also break down repeals, and maybe even look then at what the condemnations/commendations that have lasted have in common compared to those who have been repealed.

Regarding repeals, I will get around to them as soon as I finish organizing the OP. There are still some distinctions that I need to make clear before I start working on a new thread.

DrWinner wrote:
Horrible Leadership of a Region (Sedgistan, Punk Reloaded, Thatcherton, Anthony Delasanta, The Dourian Embassy, Stujenske, The Pacific)


Bolding and underlining is my own.

*Shots fired*

Might I suggest, as I am a member of the Pacific, that you re-read that condemnation there. It was issued more due to hatred of Pacifican leadership and the Lazarus affair, which better means that condemnation should be under raiding/briefing/coupling, rather than 'horrible leadership.'

The Pacific's Condemnation is listed under both "Raiding/Greifing/Couping" and "Horrible Leadership." This thread only concerns the text and arguments of C&Cs, not the context surrounding them. The Pacific's Condemnation touched on the "dictatorship and tyranny" of the NPO's leadership, and that is why it is listed under "Horrible Leadership."
Pergamon wrote:I agree. The Pacific was mainly condemned for Lazarus back then. - Bringing TP into the category of being condemned because of "Horrible Leadership" is not only not correct in a factual way, but also rather insulting and disappointing. The SC resolution was even repealed because it contained factual errors regarding the Pacific itself.

Lynopia wrote:Usually, regions with horrible leadership do not enjoy stable government with a happy native population for thirteen and more years. :roll:

I should mention that the category "Horrible Leadership of a Region" refers to both incompetent leadership and tyrannical leadership. "Horrible" is just a word that fits both meanings, and it is not meant to belittle or insult anyone listed under that category. I am simply organizing each C&C under its relevant arguments. I tried to do this impartially and without bias to the best of my ability. The categories of each C&C were not fabricated in my imagination; they originate from the text of each resolution. According to the Pacific's Condemnation, the NPO has "imposed dictatorship and tyranny on the native population of The Pacific." This is an example of a Condemnation using tyrannical leadership of a region as an argument for why a nominee should be condemned. Therefore, TP's Condemnation is listed under "Horrible Leadership." Again, this has nothing to do with my personal opinion; it is in the text of the resolution.

Also, as I said myself in the OP, "Note that some resolutions here were repealed, proven false, would be illegal today, or are no longer considered to be commendable/condemnatory." Therefore, I am not declaring that whatever is said in a resolution is true. The Pacific's Condemnation may have been proven false in some areas and subsequently repealed, but that does not changed the text and arguments of the Condemnation itself. The Condemnation was still passed in the past, and therefore will be recorded in this thread.
We Are Not the NSA wrote:Guys, guys, let's chill for a minute. The OOC reason that TP was condemned was for the coup in Lazarus, and I agree with you that it should be moved, but just by analyzing the text you can see where TMI is coming from. IC the main argument for the condemnation was that the NPO was doing a poor job of running TP. TMI isn't passing judgement on TP, he read the resolution and interpreted its arguments. Honestly, it's kind of funny how personal you guys are making this.

SC #177 was a piece of legislature that was meant to be a criticism of the NPO, the "Leadership of [the] Region". Only a single clause mentioned Lazarus, and only 4 clauses were explicitly about coups or raids. SC #177 differed from most other coup/raid related condemnations in that instead of just saying "The Pacific is bad because they couped Lazarus..." it said "The Pacific is run by the NPO, and the NPO is bad because it decided to coup Lazarus..." Get it? According to the text of the resolution, The Pacific wasn't bad, it's leadership was.

And just a reminder, none of this is my opinion of TP or the NPO. It was the opinion of the WA (before the repeal), based on the text of the Condemnation. If you need a tl;dr of what my argument in this post was, it is basically that last sentence.

This is an accurate description of how I categorized each C&C. OOC context doesn't matter; it is only the text and arguments of a C&C that concern me.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 3:32 am
by Bears Armed
RP was a factor in Bears Armed's commendation, although only quite briefly mentioned in the actual text, as well.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 5:29 am
by The Marsupial Illuminati
Bears Armed wrote:RP was a factor in Bears Armed's commendation, although only quite briefly mentioned in the actual text, as well.

Fixed.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:58 pm
by Todd McCloud
This is a great list - thanks for compiling it!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 10:13 pm
by Alustrian
A nice guide!

My only complaint is that you misspelled my name :P (twice ;_;) - there is only one "s" in Nasad.

PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 1:21 am
by The Marsupial Illuminati
Todd McCloud wrote:This is a great list - thanks for compiling it!

Thank you.
Alustrian wrote:A nice guide!

My only complaint is that you misspelled my name :P (twice ;_;) - there is only one "s" in Nasad.

Sorry about that. It has been fixed.