Should We Condem DEN?

[New Spero]

... I think condemnations are just a way to say "hey, look, we got the attention of NSG and were awesome!"

[The Korami]

I'm sorry, I wrote this in 5 minutes, the end.

So in other words, you couldn't be bothered to write an actual condemnation, so you just posted a fraudulent piece of anti-DEN propaganda to get people to agree with your position? Most people write the proposal before starting a discussion on it.

Heh. I tell you, boy, this is the funniest argument I've ever had the privilege to watch.

[SpanishMonk]

I have no idea whats going on, but I must input my vote. DEN is a raider region, they are annoying buzzing flies we would dearly love to swat, but I'm not going to condemn people just for doing what their commanders tell them to. DEN is also helpful, they take over inactive regions, therefore the nation of SpanishMonk and the Spanish Kingdom, are saying NAY to this proposition.

{OOC: This is my first Security Council discussion... Do we vote here? I don't really understand}

Therefore, I conclude, nations of the Security Council, I beg of you, Do not condemn DEN for doing what all nations do, and for clearing up the inactive regions along the way.

VOTE NAY!

[We Are Not the NSA]

I have no idea whats going on, but I must input my vote. DEN is a raider region, they are annoying buzzing flies we would dearly love to swat, but I'm not going to condemn people just for doing what their commanders tell them to. DEN is also helpful, they take over inactive regions, therefore the nation of SpanishMonk and the Spanish Kingdom, are saying NAY to this proposition.

{OOC: This is my first Security Council discussion... Do we vote here? I don't really understand}

Therefore, I conclude, nations of the Security Council, I beg of you, Do not condemn DEN for doing what all nations do, and for clearing up the inactive regions along the way.

VOTE NAY!

The biggest issue that this thread has had all along is that it was never actually a proposal in the first place.

Usually the way the SC works is someone writes a proposal, and posts it in this forum for other members to comment on. After anywhere between a few and many revisions are made, the proposal is submitted. In order to make it to vote, the proposal must be approved by 6% of WA Delegates (currently 97 approvals are needed) within about 3 days, at which point it becomes in queue. Once it gets to the front of the voting queue, it actually goes to vote, where all members of the World Assembly vote yes or no. The place where you can see what is currently at vote can be found here (there is nothing currently at vote).

This thread never actually had a proposal it was discussing, and the OP abandoned it weeks ago.