NATION

PASSWORD

[Draft] Repeal "Condemn DEN"

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.
Post a reply
User avatar
Derpsadaslkkf
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Oct 11, 2015
Ex-Nation

[Draft] Repeal "Condemn DEN"

Postby Derpsadaslkkf » Tue Dec 15, 2015 5:04 pm

Noticing that after the condemning of DEN, recruits started to pour in at an increased rate.

Shocked that DEN takes pride in this proposal.

Alarmed that the rate of invasions are still constant.

Wondering if the condemnation was necessary.

Noting that a condemnation is deemed unnecessary if a region wants it.

Rembering that St. Abbaddon is being voting on for liberation by delegates.

Hereby propose that Condemn DEN be struck out null and void.
Last edited by Derpsadaslkkf on Thu Dec 17, 2015 4:32 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Top
User avatar
Kaboomlandia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7395
Founded: May 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kaboomlandia » Tue Dec 15, 2015 6:21 pm

What's wrong with NSA's version that makes us need this one?
In=character, Kaboomlandia is a World Assembly member and abides by its resolutions. If this nation isn't in the WA, it's for practical reasons.
Author of GA #371 and SC #208, #214, #226, #227, #230, #232
Co-Author of SC #204
"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result."
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
"Your legitimacy, Kaboom, has melted away in my eyes. I couldn't have believed that only a shadow of your once brilliant WA career remains."
Top
User avatar
ErikTheRed
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 2
Founded: Dec 15, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby ErikTheRed » Tue Dec 15, 2015 7:20 pm

This should be apllauded. Real men conquer and plunder and if this condemnation gives them more recruits, we should condemn these brave souls more!
Top
User avatar
We Are Not the NSA
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1542
Founded: Nov 25, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby We Are Not the NSA » Tue Dec 15, 2015 8:44 pm

Derpsadaslkkf wrote:Noticing that after the condemning of DEN, recruits started to pour in at an alarming rate.

Ummmm... Hyperbole much? It's been less than a day, and our recruitment numbers have not shown any majors changes.
Shocked that DEN takes pride in this proposal.

True, for the most part.
Alarmed that the rate of invasions have spiked from this proposal.

Well... This is an outright lie. It has been less than a day since the condemnation took effect, and as far as I am aware, DEN hasn't even done a tag raid since then.
Fearing that many more regions are at risk of raid from the proposal recently released.

I laughed so hard at this absolutely ridiculous idea. Fear tactics like this are one of the most deplorable facets of politics, in RL and in NS.
\▼/We Are Not the NSA | Nohbdy | Eumaeus\▼/
Raiding HistorySecurity CouncilDear NativesTWP Raid

Retired Raider | He, Him, His | Bisexual
Top
User avatar
Tir-Na-Nog-Ta
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 25
Founded: Jul 20, 2015
Father Knows Best State

Postby Tir-Na-Nog-Ta » Wed Dec 16, 2015 12:43 am

Derpsadaslkkf wrote:Fearing that many more regions are at risk of raid from the proposal recently released.


Last I remember proposals don't raid regions
Top
User avatar
Cormac Stark
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1417
Founded: Apr 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Cormac Stark » Wed Dec 16, 2015 6:20 am

Derpsadaslkkf wrote:Noticing that after the condemning of DEN, recruits started to pour in at an alarming rate.

DEN actively recruits and there has been a spike in nation creation in general. Unless you're planning to prove correlation is causation, this is dubious.

Derpsadaslkkf wrote:Shocked that DEN takes pride in this proposal.

DEN's point man in St Abbaddon, Brigadier General Knot II, voted against the condemnation. Try again.

Derpsadaslkkf wrote:Alarmed that the rate of invasions have spiked from this proposal.

This is just blatantly untrue.

Derpsadaslkkf wrote:Fearing that many more regions are at risk of raid from the proposal recently released.

:lol:

Derpsadaslkkf wrote:Hereby propose that Condemn DEN be struck out null and void.

I hereby propose that we instead vote for the quality repeal authored by We Are Not the NSA instead of this fact-free nonsense.
Top
User avatar
Xoriet
Minister
 
Posts: 2046
Founded: Jun 08, 2012
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Xoriet » Wed Dec 16, 2015 8:48 am

Derpsadaslkkf wrote:Noticing that after the condemning of DEN, recruits started to pour in at an alarming rate.

Shocked that DEN takes pride in this proposal.


Alarmed that the rate of invasions have spiked from this proposal.

Fearing that many more regions are at risk of raid from the proposal recently released.

Hereby propose that Condemn DEN be struck out null and void.

He told you so.

This is why you [natives] can't have nice things. You're too busy helping the people [invaders] who also want your nice things. :p
Senator of Diplomatic Affairs of the New Pacific Order

This flame we carry into battle
A fading memory
This light will conquer the darkness
Shining bright for all to see
Top
User avatar
Derpsadaslkkf
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Oct 11, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Derpsadaslkkf » Wed Dec 16, 2015 4:03 pm

Edits are being made.

UPDATE: Edits finished.
Last edited by Derpsadaslkkf on Wed Dec 16, 2015 4:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
User avatar
Tir-Na-Nog-Ta
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 25
Founded: Jul 20, 2015
Father Knows Best State

Postby Tir-Na-Nog-Ta » Wed Dec 16, 2015 6:05 pm

What do you mean about there being a lot of raider regions? Unnoticed, that is. Of course there are a lot of uncondemned ones, they havent done enough to be condemned.

:rofl:
Top
User avatar
Bhang Bhang Duc
Senator
 
Posts: 4721
Founded: Dec 17, 2003
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bhang Bhang Duc » Thu Dec 17, 2015 3:03 am

Still a repeal of inferior quality. Could also make the argument that it is not R3 compliant as well.
Former Delegate of The West Pacific. Guardian (under many Delegates) of The West Pacific. TWP's Former Minister for World Assembly Affairs and former Security Council Advisor.

The West Pacific's Official Welshman, Astronomer and Old Fart
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.

RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.

Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
Top
User avatar
The Silver Sentinel
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1226
Founded: Jul 04, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The Silver Sentinel » Thu Dec 17, 2015 2:09 pm

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Still a repeal of inferior quality. Could also make the argument that it is not R3 compliant as well.

I see little reason why the repeal should be any better than the actual condemnation itself (which was shit).
Top
User avatar
Cormac Stark
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1417
Founded: Apr 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Cormac Stark » Thu Dec 17, 2015 4:17 pm

The Silver Sentinel wrote:I see little reason why the repeal should be any better than the actual condemnation itself (which was shit).

Because we should be at least trying to uphold some quality standards and not just pass any old thing someone submits to get a badge.
Top
User avatar
Bears Armed
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21479
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Fri Dec 18, 2015 10:27 am

The Silver Sentinel wrote:
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Still a repeal of inferior quality. Could also make the argument that it is not R3 compliant as well.

I see little reason why the repeal should be any better than the actual condemnation itself (which was shit).

Because the repealed resolution's copy in the official records at least gets struck through, whereas the repeal's own copy there -- being itself unrepealable -- would be a permanently-unconcealed fixture.
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Population = just under 20 million. Economy = only Thriving. Average Life expectancy = c.60 years. If the nation is classified as 'Anarchy' there still is a [strictly limited] national government... and those aren't "biker gangs", they're traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies', generally respected rather than feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474, 1521.
Top
User avatar
Texasa
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 19
Founded: Oct 16, 2015
Ex-Nation

bad idea!

Postby Texasa » Fri Dec 18, 2015 6:40 pm

I was bullied by DEN!
Top
User avatar
Kaboomlandia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7395
Founded: May 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kaboomlandia » Sat Dec 19, 2015 6:32 pm

Texasa wrote:I was bullied by DEN!

What's that got to do with anything?
In=character, Kaboomlandia is a World Assembly member and abides by its resolutions. If this nation isn't in the WA, it's for practical reasons.
Author of GA #371 and SC #208, #214, #226, #227, #230, #232
Co-Author of SC #204
"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result."
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
"Your legitimacy, Kaboom, has melted away in my eyes. I couldn't have believed that only a shadow of your once brilliant WA career remains."
Top
User avatar
Redsward
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 399
Founded: Mar 24, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Redsward » Wed Dec 23, 2015 2:13 pm

Kaboomlandia wrote:
Texasa wrote:I was bullied by DEN!

What's that got to do with anything?

I guess we both forgot that some people try to condemn raiders because they are raiders. Or in this case, because of "cyberbullying." :palm:
Ex-Grandmaster of the small merc group Red Armor
Currently a resident of the Black Hawks
Security Council Debater
Religion and spirituality are different things
Top
Post a reply

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Advertisement

Remove ads