Quick Draft of a Resolution Condemning Melchandious

[Contrivit]

Please give me feedback on this Security Council resolution! If anything needs changing, just tell me!

SECURITY COUNCIL

Reminding all nations that threatening to use nuclear warheads on another nation is wrong,

1. Acknowledging that in the beginning, Melchandious was a great ally who was an amazing leader to her people;

2. Bearing in mind that the queen of Melchandious threatened to attack later in the alliance,

3. Distressed that Melchandious may launch nuclear warheads to attack other nations,

4. Alarmed that Melchandious would try to cut off such a beautiful alliance with countries such as my own,

5. Confident that Melchandious will be condemned for such threats.

We hereby condemn Melchandious.

[We Are Not the NSA]

Please give me feedback on this Security Council resolution! If anything needs changing, just tell me!

SECURITY COUNCIL

Reminding all nations that threatening to use nuclear warheads on another nation is wrong,

1. Acknowledging that in the beginning, Melchandious was a great ally who was an amazing leader to her people;

2. Bearing in mind that the queen of Melchandious threatened to attack later in the alliance,

3. Distressed that Melchandious may launch nuclear warheads to attack other nations,

4. Alarmed that Melchandious would try to cut off such a beautiful alliance with countries such as my own,

5. Confident that Melchandious will be condemned for such threats.

We hereby condemn Melchandious.

Not going to challenge the merit of the proposal, but two illegalities. First is an R4b violation, you can't refer to a nation as a player. More simply, proonouns like "she" "her" "he" "his" "him" "hers" etc. are illegal. Second, SC proposals need to be written from the perspective of the WA, not the writer's perspective. The second colored term is outright illegal, but the rest seems to be written from your perspective as well.

[Contrivit]

Please give me feedback on this Security Council resolution! If anything needs changing, just tell me!

SECURITY COUNCIL

Reminding all nations that threatening to use nuclear warheads on another nation is wrong,

1. Acknowledging that in the beginning, Melchandious was a great ally who was an amazing leader to her people;

2. Bearing in mind that the queen of Melchandious threatened to attack later in the alliance,

3. Distressed that Melchandious may launch nuclear warheads to attack other nations,

4. Alarmed that Melchandious would try to cut off such a beautiful alliance with countries such as my own,

5. Confident that Melchandious will be condemned for such threats.

We hereby condemn Melchandious.

Not going to challenge the merit of the proposal, but two illegalities. First is an R4b violation, you can't refer to a nation as a player. More simply, proonouns like "she" "her" "he" "his" "him" "hers" etc. are illegal. Second, SC proposals need to be written from the perspective of the WA, not the writer's perspective. The second colored term is outright illegal, but the rest seems to be written from your perspective as well.

So you would want me to get it out of my perspective and to change the things in red?

[Frisbeeteria]

This sounds more like a conflict between the two involved nations, and less like something the SC should care about in any way, shape, or form.