by Shadow Afforess » Thu Jul 10, 2014 11:18 am
by Mundiferrum » Thu Jul 10, 2014 11:22 am
by Frattastan II » Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:28 pm
waste our time with trivial matters
<@Guy> well done, fuckhead.
* @Guy claps for frattastan
by Shadow Afforess » Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:31 pm
Frattastan II wrote:waste our time with trivial matters
Matters like "Liberate Haven" proposals which aren't needed, are against the will of the residents, and add nothing to a similar resolutions submitted only days before and discussed till everyone was sick of it. Yeah, we could do away with that.
by Nation of Quebec » Thu Jul 10, 2014 2:38 pm
by Cormac A Stark » Thu Jul 10, 2014 3:53 pm
by Mundiferrum » Thu Jul 10, 2014 8:44 pm
by Elke and Elba » Thu Jul 10, 2014 8:53 pm
Ratateague wrote:NationStates seems to hate the Geneva Convention. I've lost count in how many times someone has tried to introduce something like it. Why they don't like it is a mystery to me. Probably a lot of jingoist wingnuts.
Ardchoille wrote:When you consider that (violet) once changed the colour of the whole game for one player ... you can understand how seriously NS takes its players.
by Mundiferrum » Thu Jul 10, 2014 8:55 pm
Elke and Elba wrote:Aff, it's "Repeal 'Liberate Capitalist Paradise'", not Liberate Capitalist Paradise...
by Shadow Afforess » Thu Jul 10, 2014 8:56 pm
Elke and Elba wrote:Aff, it's "Repeal 'Liberate Capitalist Paradise'", not Liberate Capitalist Paradise...
by Elke and Elba » Fri Jul 11, 2014 12:28 am
Ratateague wrote:NationStates seems to hate the Geneva Convention. I've lost count in how many times someone has tried to introduce something like it. Why they don't like it is a mystery to me. Probably a lot of jingoist wingnuts.
Ardchoille wrote:When you consider that (violet) once changed the colour of the whole game for one player ... you can understand how seriously NS takes its players.
by Oaledonia » Fri Jul 11, 2014 12:31 am
The lovable PMT nation of hugs and chibi! Now with 75% more Hanyū!
Oaledonian wiki | Decoli Defense | Embassy | OAF Military InfoUnder construction
*POLITICALLY CONTENTIOUS STATEMENTS INTENSIFY*
by Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Jul 11, 2014 4:39 am
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
by The Grim Reaper » Fri Jul 11, 2014 5:23 am
AGREEING that this Council's mission statement is to spread interregional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.
NOTING that Capitalist Paradise maintains an active founder
DETERMINING that the "liberation" will have no effect whatsoever due to the active presence of a founder
HOPING in the future the Security Council resolution authors will not waste our time with trivial matters and focus on interregional peace and goodwill
Hereby repeals "Liberates Capitalist Paradise"
by Shadow Afforess » Fri Jul 11, 2014 7:39 am
Soldati senza confini wrote:Against the repeal.
When the SC was blatantly used to attempt to liberate a region, the proposal was submitted, raiders came in and told everyone to fuck off (basically) and that these were all merely the mechanics of the game, where were you with this moment of revelation?
Further, when your proposal came into the floor you should have known the consequences: namely, that you and your region would receive the flak of an entire community.
If you can't tolerate the fact that we're playing the same game YOU are trying to engage on, don't come here trying to get my support for a repeal. I cannot, in good will nor conscience, support such a thing when it is using the same anti-raiding logic others have used before and was denied by the same party who is making the repeal.
by Shadow Afforess » Fri Jul 11, 2014 7:41 am
The Grim Reaper wrote:I'm for the Liberation of Capitalist Paradise, and AGAINST this insta-repeal. This insta-repeal is biased, politically motivated, and badly thought out. It's simply not a passable piece of legislation.
by Mundiferrum » Fri Jul 11, 2014 7:50 am
Soldati senza confini wrote:Against the repeal.
When the SC was blatantly used to attempt to liberate a region, the proposal was submitted, raiders came in and told everyone to fuck off (basically) and that these were all merely the mechanics of the game, where were you with this moment of revelation?
Further, when your proposal came into the floor you should have known the consequences: namely, that you and your region would receive the flak of an entire community.
If you can't tolerate the fact that we're playing the same game YOU are trying to engage on, don't come here trying to get my support for a repeal. I cannot, in good will nor conscience, support such a thing when it is using the same anti-raiding logic others have used before and was denied by the same party who is making the repeal.
by Nierr » Fri Jul 11, 2014 7:53 am
Precedent already set, see Liberate Nazi Europe. Next.Mundiferrum wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:Against the repeal.
When the SC was blatantly used to attempt to liberate a region, the proposal was submitted, raiders came in and told everyone to fuck off (basically) and that these were all merely the mechanics of the game, where were you with this moment of revelation?
Further, when your proposal came into the floor you should have known the consequences: namely, that you and your region would receive the flak of an entire community.
If you can't tolerate the fact that we're playing the same game YOU are trying to engage on, don't come here trying to get my support for a repeal. I cannot, in good will nor conscience, support such a thing when it is using the same anti-raiding logic others have used before and was denied by the same party who is making the repeal.
Really, all this level of hypocrisy is doing is two things:
1. First, it's setting the precedent for resolutions like "Liberate Haven",
"Declaring that peace is more important to the international community than goodwill"2. Second, it's showing everyone that the SC is not really following the general spirit of its purpose. Destroying a region for supporting a controversial piece of legislation? That's not "spreading goodwill", that's being petty and exclusive!
You're spelling 'poetic justice' really badly.Yes, Capitalist Paradise's actions with regards to Liberate Haven were (at least, to you) fairly despicable, but to work by their own means in order to destroy them? That's more despicable than their own!
And the fact that their work on Liberate Haven didn't amount to anything but flak, is that not something that you're open to?
by Mundiferrum » Fri Jul 11, 2014 8:11 am
Nierr wrote:Precedent already set, see Liberate Nazi Europe. Next.
"Declaring that peace is more important to the international community than goodwill"
]You're spelling 'poetic justice' really badly.
It trolled the RP community. Something I'm against.
by Nierr » Fri Jul 11, 2014 8:15 am
But not erased. Still happened. Still counts.
I don't care what I'm giving them, except a Liberation. Because if CP ever does go founderless, that'll be a happy day for Nationstates."Declaring that peace is more important to the international community than goodwill"
Declaring that the discussion is over, and all this is petty retribution. Do you really think you're shutting their mouths by liberating their region, or giving them a cause to be more vocal?
And politics doesn't eliminate the poetic justice of what's happening here.]You're spelling 'poetic justice' really badly.
Poetic justice does not equate to politics.
Actually child is a pretty good way to describe the SC. It pats its friends on the back, talks shit about its enemies.It trolled the RP community. Something I'm against.
What's done is done. Only a child (or a dictator, which I am sure this democratic community would not stand itself to be) would pursue retribution like this.
Your move.
by Mundiferrum » Fri Jul 11, 2014 8:25 am
I don't care what I'm giving them, except a Liberation. Because if CP ever does go founderless, that'll be a happy day for Nationstates. [/quote]"Declaring that peace is more important to the international community than goodwill"
Declaring that the discussion is over, and all this is petty retribution. Do you really think you're shutting their mouths by liberating their region, or giving them a cause to be more vocal?
And politics doesn't eliminate the poetic justice of what's happening here.[/quote]You're spelling 'poetic justice' really badly.
Poetic justice does not equate to politics.
Actually child is a pretty good way to describe the SC. It pats its friends on the back, talks shit about its enemies.[/quote]It trolled the RP community. Something I'm against.
What's done is done. Only a child (or a dictator, which I am sure this democratic community would not stand itself to be) would pursue retribution like this.
Your move.
by Mundiferrum » Fri Jul 11, 2014 8:28 am
Nierr wrote:Eh, just do what I do, half-ass it and campaign to get to quorum, works every time
by Nierr » Fri Jul 11, 2014 8:31 am
Mundiferrum wrote:Nierr wrote:Eh, just do what I do, half-ass it and campaign to get to quorum, works every time
That....
I am disturbed that you would regard this assembly with such disrespect, as if you were only looking for the badge.
Yet, oddly enough, I am tempted to follow your example. King Ozy has always told me that I'm nothing to him as long as I didn't pass anything in the WA....
Also, that's not really much of a response.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement