Advertisement
by DWAsnia » Thu Jul 10, 2014 7:38 pm
by Mundiferrum » Thu Jul 10, 2014 8:58 pm
Nierr wrote:Mundiferrum wrote:Wait, since the founder of Capitalist Paradise is still active, if he imposed a password on the region right now, would this proposal suddenly run afoul of rule 3? [ viewtopic.php?f=24&t=79106 ] Or would that be sort of akin to ex post facto (or something)?
Nope to both. You can still propose Liberations of founder passworded regions (as Liberations also prevent delegate imposed passwords).
I did this before with Liberate The Greater German Reich.
by Vaculatestar4 » Thu Jul 10, 2014 11:10 pm
by Sichuan Pepper » Thu Jul 10, 2014 11:18 pm
Mallorea and Riva wrote:Yeah but no one here can read. Literacy is a tool used by fendas, like IRC or morals.
by Chester Pearson » Fri Jul 11, 2014 5:51 am
Separatist Peoples wrote:With a lawnchair and a large bag of popcorn in hand, Ambassador SaDiablo walks in and sets himself up comfortably. Out of a dufflebag comes a large foam finger with the name "Chester Pearson" emblazoned on it, as well as a few six-packs.
by Vaculatestar4 » Fri Jul 11, 2014 7:14 am
by Shadow Afforess » Fri Jul 11, 2014 7:16 am
The "tit for tat" ruling only applies to proposals that have no substantial argument other than commending/condemning/liberating/whatevering in direct response to another proposal/resolution. Since the proposal in question contains other arguments, it doesn't fall foul of the tit for tat ruling.
by Vaculatestar4 » Fri Jul 11, 2014 7:16 am
by Nierr » Fri Jul 11, 2014 7:45 am
Shadow Afforess wrote:Now that tit for tat rules have been clarified...
by Shadow Afforess » Fri Jul 11, 2014 8:03 am
by The Gregorach » Fri Jul 11, 2014 8:05 am
by Nierr » Fri Jul 11, 2014 8:05 am
Shadow Afforess wrote:If the author here wants to play with fire, let's play with real fire: https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopi ... #p20886642
I promise never to release or distribute aforementioned tool if the author withdraws his proposal and does not propose new submissions regarding Liberating Capitalist Paradise.
by Shadow Afforess » Fri Jul 11, 2014 8:05 am
Nierr wrote:Shadow Afforess wrote:If the author here wants to play with fire, let's play with real fire: viewtopic.php?f=15&t=304114#p20886642
I promise never to release or distribute aforementioned tool if the author withdraws his proposal and does not propose new submissions regarding Liberating Capitalist Paradise.
I don't take kindly to threats Afforess.
You wanna fight fire with fire?
Then let's play.
by Elke and Elba » Fri Jul 11, 2014 8:08 am
Ratateague wrote:NationStates seems to hate the Geneva Convention. I've lost count in how many times someone has tried to introduce something like it. Why they don't like it is a mystery to me. Probably a lot of jingoist wingnuts.
Ardchoille wrote:When you consider that (violet) once changed the colour of the whole game for one player ... you can understand how seriously NS takes its players.
by Astarial » Fri Jul 11, 2014 8:10 am
Shadow Afforess wrote:If the author here wants to play with fire, let's play with real fire: https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopi ... #p20886642
by Mundiferrum » Fri Jul 11, 2014 8:14 am
https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=304114.
Really, all this level of hypocrisy is doing is two things:
1. First, it's setting the precedent for resolutions like "Liberate Haven", the very thing the current supporters of "Lib. Capitalist Paradise" do not in fact support. You're adding to the arguments of your opponents by doing this kind of thing, something which would definitely open a Pandora's box for future proposals like this.
2. Second, it's showing everyone that the SC is not really following the general spirit of its purpose. Destroying a region for supporting a controversial piece of legislation? That's not "spreading goodwill", that's being petty and exclusive! You're demeaning the very purpose of the SC by supporting such a resolution, something which I am sure you'd actually care about!
Yes, Capitalist Paradise's actions with regards to Liberate Haven were (at least, to you) fairly despicable, but to work by their own means in order to destroy them? That's more despicable than their own! And the fact that their work on Liberate Haven didn't amount to anything but flak, is that not something that you're open to?
by The Blaatschapen » Fri Jul 11, 2014 8:16 am
Shadow Afforess wrote:If the author here wants to play with fire, let's play with real fire: https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopi ... #p20886642
I promise never to release or distribute aforementioned tool if the author withdraws his proposal and does not propose new submissions regarding Liberating Capitalist Paradise.
by the Imperial Crown » Fri Jul 11, 2014 8:28 am
- Lord Ravenclaw -
10th Pharaoh and World Assembly Delegate
First Pharaoh of House Ravenclaw
= The Desert Star of Osiris =
5th April 2012 - 29th May 2014
by Mundiferrum » Fri Jul 11, 2014 8:31 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement