Premislyd wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:You know your sentence to me directly contradicts the implications to the person right below me, right?
You're asserting to me you're not implying you have the right to take their regions by force and at the same time you ARE telling them that it is the raider's right to try if they want to.
Err, what? English there, broseph.
I think I wrote a perfectly legible sentence there.
You're telling me one thing and in the same post you're implying precisely what you told me you're not implying.






Seriously? That is what it has come to now?
