Page 1 of 1
The "Repeal Condemn Macedon" Proposal
Posted:
Sun Sep 29, 2013 7:24 pmby Belzia
I saw this good proposal floating around with 2 yeses out of the 77 needed on it and I think it would be good to support. It goes as follows.
SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: adaloupe_1380473069
Repeal "Condemn Macedon"
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.
Category: Repeal
Resolution: SC#1
Proposed by: Adaloupe
Description: WA Security Council Resolution #1: Condemn Macedon shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
Argument: To the Security Council:
NOTING that Macedon is not really a threat to the world as it contains only one nation.
ALSO NOTING that the world factbook has been changed since the condemnation.
DOUBTING that condemnations should be written with any beliefs.
HEREBY REPEALS: SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION #1: Condemn Macedon
Posted:
Sun Sep 29, 2013 8:12 pmby Abacathea
If you're doubting whether a proposal should contain a belief yoire essentially adding your own are you not?
Also I remember the previous draft and if I remember correctly it was nayed by some of the bigger delegates very quickly here which is where matters. 77 approvals is piss easy to get.
Find a better target if you're looking for an SC authorship. This isn't it.
Posted:
Sun Sep 29, 2013 8:57 pmby Ukko
Against.
Macedon still holds region
Finland as a trophy Among other regions) after ten years. If something is condemnable in principle at all, then such thing is Something absolutely Condemnworthy.
Condemnation resolution SC#1 should be kept untouched and unchanged for showing some respect for The Macedon... As a Badge of Honor.
Posted:
Mon Sep 30, 2013 6:38 amby SkyDip
This also still stands as a bit of nostalgia for a lot of folks. I'm against the repeal.
Posted:
Tue Oct 01, 2013 7:44 amby Frattastan II
Is it even a proposal "written from the perspective of the World Assembly" if the opening clause is "To the Security Council"?
Posted:
Tue Oct 01, 2013 7:58 amby Imperial States of the Empire
Certainly this proposal must be a joke. I doubt that anyone with a right state of mind will approve this proposal. Currently in needs over 60 votes and has only a day and some hours to be approved.
a note
Posted:
Tue Oct 01, 2013 3:08 pmby Belzia
I didn't write this, just to clarify. I just thought it had some purpose.
Posted:
Tue Oct 01, 2013 6:22 pmby Feux
Something in my heart doesn't want the first SC proposal replied. Not sure why yet.
Posted:
Wed Oct 02, 2013 3:37 amby Charax
Feux wrote:Something in my heart doesn't want the first SC proposal replied. Not sure why yet.
I know what you mean. It'd feel wrong, somehow.
Opposed.
Posted:
Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:47 amby Sedgistan
Frattastan II wrote:Is it even a proposal "written from the perspective of the World Assembly" if the opening clause is "
To the Security Council"?
Really pedantic, but you're right. Proposal removed.
Posted:
Wed Oct 02, 2013 6:38 amby SkyDip
Sedgistan wrote:Frattastan II wrote:Is it even a proposal "written from the perspective of the World Assembly" if the opening clause is "
To the Security Council"?
Really pedantic, but you're right. Proposal removed.
Bastard Mod strikes again.
Posted:
Thu Oct 03, 2013 5:46 amby Abacathea
Belzia wrote:I didn't write this, just to clarify. I just thought it had some purpose.
This comment confuses me, If you didn't write it, who did? Why are you posting it and who is the Organ Grinder behind the monkey in that case?
Posted:
Thu Oct 03, 2013 10:33 amby Imperial States of the Empire
Sedgistan wrote:Frattastan II wrote:Is it even a proposal "written from the perspective of the World Assembly" if the opening clause is "
To the Security Council"?
Really pedantic, but you're right. Proposal removed.
Finally some action has been taken