[SUBMITTED] Condemn the Animal Union

[Spartan Philidelphia]

The Condemnation of the Animal Union

The WA shall condemn the Animal Union for its

1. Aggressive Behavior towards those that do not conform with its policies. An example of this is the many wars they had declared unto many. The many threats of unrealistically large armies headed towards capital cities.

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1633
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1701
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1626
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1540


2. The fact that they went to war with a country because it was accused of using nuclear weapons although there was no evidence to support the claims.

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1617

3. Their proposal to repeal the reduction of abortion uses unnecessary words to describe religious people (A.K.A. “Religious whack-Os”). Also, it goes far beyond just a simple repeal by forcing WA members to stop all abortion reduction programs.

HOPING that by condemning the Animal Union, they will realize that they must clean up their act before something seriously horrible happens.

Have a good evening... do what you like with this draft.

[Omigodtheykilledkenny]

They're already being condemned. Besides, you should probably wait for the rules on condemnations to be ironed out first.

[Spartan Philidelphia]

I'll just wait then. Waiting and waiting... yeah.

[Jeuna]

/wa/ is not your personal army.

[Omigodtheykilledkenny]

/wa/ is not your personal army.

Tell that to [violet].

[Spartan Philidelphia]

/wa/ is not your personal army.

I wonder when I ever said that...

GO WA! UNLEASH MY TERROR UNTO ALL THOSE WHO OPPOSE MY WRATH. LET THEY TREMBLE BEFORE ME. DO MY WILL ELSE YOU TOO, SHALL BE BURIED UNDER MY THRONE OF EVIL!

[Zaku212]

hmmm while i find their idea's to get rid of the abortion reduction act,and their ideas to try turn the entire WA into a socialist bloc idiotic and incredibly tiresome and quite tedius, i do however agree to their anti nukes stance,as my country also refuses to use/develop nuclear bombs missiles(we do however use nuclear reactors and such).

but i highly doubt any nation,who already possesses nuclear arms,will disarm them
because:
(i) the action would have to be agreed to by all
(ii)carried out at the same time(as they would suspect each other to attack one-another,while their guards are down.
(iii)who would fund it
(iV)some people just get a kick out of saying "my country has nukes,and bazillions of tanks, so shut up"

[Goobergunchia]

Could the ambassador from Spartan Philidelphia provide examples of the alleged behavior of The Animal Union? We are not familiar with the conduct of this nation, and would prefer to have concrete evidence before expressing an opinion on the draft proposal.

[Lord] Michael Evif
Goobergunchian UN Ambassador

[Weylara]

Could the ambassador from Spartan Philidelphia provide examples of the alleged behavior of The Animal Union? We are not familiar with the conduct of this nation, and would prefer to have concrete evidence before expressing an opinion on the draft proposal.

[Lord] Michael Evif
Goobergunchian UN Ambassador

Oh, he'll have plenty of examples to choose from. I fully support Spartan Philadelphia and the current proposal at debate.

[Spartan Philidelphia]

Here we go!

---

http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1617
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1633
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1701
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1626
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1540

They have stated that they have made peace with the countries they went to war with. They still continue signs of aggression using the World Assembly:

The proposal to condemn Kopania, a nation that had submitted another proposal to condemn the Animal Union.

They have also proposed things that then go far beyond what it should be:

Their proposal to ban Ban Gasoline-Powered Cars also bans off-shore drilling and replaces them with expensive solar panels. The proposal itself, is quite insane by my standards.

I think I already explained the proposal to repeal the resolution that reduces abortion.

They proposed a ban on Capitalism... Ideological Bans are illegal.

---

Well, thats all the ones I could get before getting tired and sleepy.

[Omigodtheykilledkenny]

The queue is already weeks long. Why we should expend any of our precious time debating the actions of some n00b is beyond me.

[Spartan Philidelphia]

Yeah, I have to leave for some "vacation" anyway, so I won't be able to do anything. I'll just let this post die then. But not before submitting it!

[Spartan Philidelphia]

I wonder if they will condemn me like they did with Kopania.

[Ruana]

I am still trying to get my head around this condemnation forum, but nonetheless, if evidence is sufficient against Animal Union, then it should be passed. However, Animal Union, should have the right to defend itself for its actions.

[Weylara]

The Animal Union has the right, of course. The things that matter, though, are capacity and obigation.

[Weylara]

I wonder if they will condemn me like they did with Kopania.

It won't get enough approvals.

[Quintessence of Dust]

Every few weeks someone comes along and submits multiple proposals. Sometimes these are of an outrageous nature. Once they realize the proposals aren't going anywhere, they usually fade away. Condemning them is, as evidenced by the back-and-forth now being conducted in the proposal queue, simply giving the oxygen of publicity and making it more likely they'll persist with proposal spam.

If you want to debate their tactics, there are plenty of means of conversation available: RMB, TGs, or the forums.

[Jeuna]

/wa/ is not your personal army.

Tell that to [violet].

Tyranny!

[James Bluntus]

There is no way that the singing nation of James Bluntus can support this.

[Tiesabre]

This is another example of radical ideals the poison the WA. Hold your tongue Spartan Philidelphia

[The Oan Isles]

OOC: I'm sorry to sound mean or anything but this is atrocious.

The Government of The Isles Democratic Commonwealth through it's Ministry of Foreign Affairs will not support this resolution. Firstly basic formatting and grammar serve more as scornful innuendo. It clearly violates SC Proposal Rules. It's rather undignified. "Their unrealistically large army". Who are you to determine the comprehensibility of any force and determine what should and shouldn't be its magnitude? What laws it has proposed and have been passed are all legal and have been accepted. If it is your governments opinion -- as we have discerned your attempt to imply -- that nations are ignorant, idiotic and were swayed you won't make many friends. Capable governments have made their choices. We have no evidence that they used "religious whackos" in their proposals etc.

HOPING that by condemning the Animal Union, they
will realize that they must clean up their act before
something seriously horrible happens.

What are you implying? We would never support such a law.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the IDC

[SkyDip]

Holy four-year gravedig, Batman.

[Dread Lady Nathicana]

Kill it! Kill it with fire! Back, oh naughty evil spawn! *pats down firmly with modly shovel*