(DRAFT) Commend Connopolis

[NewTyler]

Commend Connopolis
IDENTIFYING the nation of Connopolis as the founder of the Antarctic Alliance region.
OBSERVING the countless efforts Connopolis has taken to better all nations everywhere.
RECOGNIZES Connopolis’s success in bettering all nations by passing multiple resolutions in both branches of the WA.
NOTING the resolutions he has passed in chronological order:
-GA Resolution #161
Medical Standards in Prisons
This resolution bettered the lives of convicted criminals in prison by appointing medical professionals equivalent to the prisons population and giving them access to antibiotics.
- GA resolution #162
On Humanitarian Aid

Was created to improve the lives of Humanitarian Aid workers seeing as they are sometimes casualties during conflict. This Resolution provided that all neutral zones display recognized humanitarian aid
Insignias to prevent inadvertent conflict.

-GA resolution #169
Social Assistance Accord

This resolution sought to assist disadvantaged individuals, whenever possible, in order to propel them back into the workforce, to prevent them from becoming long-lasting burdens to society, and to promote general economic prosperity.

It called for the development of Unemployment Insurance Agencies to lessen the burden on financially strained individuals.

-GA resolution # 177
Concerning Financial Fraud
This resolution recognized the existence of financial fraud in nations and especially against public and state institutions, and its pervasive strain on the economies of many nations. It sought to bring an end to financial fraud.

-GA resolution # 181
Repeal "Medical Blockade Restriction"
Under GA resolution #181 the access of Medical supplies through blockades was repealed.



SC resolution #70
Commend Glen-Rhodes
This resolution was passed to recognize the great work done by Glen-Rhodes in bettering all nations and his resolutions.
GA resolutions #52, 61, 70, 94, 112, and 130.

- SC resolution # 77
Condemn Milograd
This resolution was passed to recognize the horrendous behavior of Milograd and his dossier of religious and racial intolerance.

PROVING that Connopolis has done a magnificent job in bettering the welfare of all nations in the WA.
HEARBY commends Connopolis

[Cerian Quilor]

Writing Resolutions isn't enough to get a commendation. Not alone.

[Sciongrad]

Against. Seeing as some of the resolutions enumerated were repealed (and thus your argument supporting them bears little weight), I can see very little reason for this.

[Feux]

Writing Resolutions isn't enough to get a commendation. Not alone.

That is debatable.


Ok. There are several things I would like to address:

Identify the nation of Connopolis as the founder of the Antarctic Alliance region;

Ok, I know very little about the Antarctic Alliance, but I would advise that you to give details about the region and its impact or significance it has had on the international community and then track those significances back to Connopolis, if he has had anything to do with them. That will reenforce this clause greatly.

Observing the countless efforts Connopolis has taken to better all nations everywhere;
Recognizing Connopolis’s success in bettering all nations by passing multiple resolutions in both branches of the WA;
Noting the resolutions he has passed in chronological order:

I would suggest, to help not make your proposal so broken up, combining these clauses into one. Each clause should hit a certain point, in my opinion. Maybe something like:

Recognizing Connopolis' many successes and countless efforts in both the Security Council and General Assembly, which have served in the interest of bettering the international community as a whole, and are listed in chronological order below:

Something along those lines, thinking off the top of my head.

GA Resolution #161: Medical Standards in Prisons

• A resolution to betters the lives of convicted criminals in prison by appointing medical professionals equivalent to the prisons population and giving them access to antibiotics.

GA resolution #162: On Humanitarian Aid

• Was created to improve the lives of Humanitarian Aid workers seeing as they are sometimes casualties during conflict. This Resolution provided that all neutral zones display recognized humanitarian aid Insignias to prevent inadvertent conflict.

GA resolution #169: Social Assistance Accord

• This resolution sought to assist disadvantaged individuals, whenever possible, in order to propel them back into the workforce, to prevent them from becoming long-lasting burdens to society, and to promote general economic prosperity. It also called for the development of Unemployment Insurance Agencies to lessen the burden on financially strained individuals.

GA resolution # 177: Concerning Financial Fraud

• This resolution recognized the existence of financial fraud in nations and especially against public and state institutions, and its pervasive strain on the economies of many nations. It sought to bring an end to financial fraud.

GA resolution # 181: Repeal "Medical Blockade Restriction"

• Under GA resolution #181 the access of Medical supplies through blockades was repealed.

etc. etc. etc.

Just a little format suggestions, you don't have to use them but they generally look cleaner to me. But that is just me. The etc part is just because I got a little lazy.

Proving that Connopolis has done a magnificent job in bettering the welfare of all nations in the WA;

I don't like the word proving, because you haven't proven anything yet. I would suggest changing it out for the word Believing, as it is your proposal and you believe in what you are saying, you haven't proven it.

Hereby Commends Connopolis.

You want to include the word commends in the starting of the ending clause.

All in all, it is a pretty good start. You are currently heading down the right path. Hope my tips were helpful. Just keep at it.

[Cerian Quilor]

Everything in the SC is debatable.

[Vladisvok Destino]

Against. Seeing as some of the resolutions enumerated were repealed (and thus your argument supporting them bears little weight), I can see very little reason for this.

Agreeing with the above and also adding that just because a resolution is still on the books doesn't mean that it's a good thing. At best you could perhaps argue good intentions, but poor execution.

I would suggest to the author that if he's serious then less focus on what Connopolis has done in the WA and finding other commendable actions might be a better idea.

[Feux]

Everything in the SC is debatable.

It wouldn't be the SC otherwise.

[Abacathea]

Writing Resolutions isn't enough to get a commendation. Not alone.

Hell if it was I'd be commendable.... and I don't feel I play well with others well enough just yet

[SkyDip]

Writing Resolutions isn't enough to get a commendation. Not alone.

See Glen-Rhodes.

[Cerian Quilor]

Writing Resolutions isn't enough to get a commendation. Not alone.

See Glen-Rhodes.

And Glen-Rhodes didn't deserve his commendation anymore than Connopolis does.

Resolutions can be part of a commend, but not the entire thing.

[Feux]

See Glen-Rhodes.

And Glen-Rhodes didn't deserve his commendation anymore than Connopolis does.

Resolutions can be part of a commend, but not the entire thing.

No. The Glen-Rhodes resolution set a precedent that world assembly writting is commendable alone if anything because it passed.

[Abacathea]

And Glen-Rhodes didn't deserve his commendation anymore than Connopolis does.

Resolutions can be part of a commend, but not the entire thing.

No. The Glen-Rhodes resolution set a precedent that world assembly writting is commendable alone if anything because it passed.

Ah but if memory serves precedents are moot in the WA halls. I might be paraphrasing here but I believe it's something along the lines of "just because an act passes is not essentially indicative of it's legality, although it cannot be repealed on the basis that it is illegal alone."

[Feux]

No. The Glen-Rhodes resolution set a precedent that world assembly writting is commendable alone if anything because it passed.

Ah but if memory serves precedents are moot in the WA halls. I might be paraphrasing here but I believe it's something along the lines of "just because an act passes is not essentially indicative of it's legality, although it cannot be repealed on the basis that it is illegal alone."

Everything is debatable in the World Assembly, however, I was addressing this attitude of entitle that some people seem to crown themselves with on what is acceptable and what is not acceptable in the World Assembly today. Everyone is entitled in an opinion, but going around and telling new world assembly authors that something is not acceptable even though it clearly has been in the no so far past I highly discourage.

[Abacathea]

Ah but if memory serves precedents are moot in the WA halls. I might be paraphrasing here but I believe it's something along the lines of "just because an act passes is not essentially indicative of it's legality, although it cannot be repealed on the basis that it is illegal alone."

Everything is debatable in the World Assembly, however, I was addressing this attitude of entitle that some people seem to crown themselves with on what is acceptable and what is not acceptable in the World Assembly today. Everyone is entitled in an opinion, but going around and telling new world assembly authors that something is not acceptable even though it clearly has been in the no so far past I highly discourage.

I can understand that rational

[Cerian Quilor]

Ah but if memory serves precedents are moot in the WA halls. I might be paraphrasing here but I believe it's something along the lines of "just because an act passes is not essentially indicative of it's legality, although it cannot be repealed on the basis that it is illegal alone."

Everything is debatable in the World Assembly, however, I was addressing this attitude of entitle that some people seem to crown themselves with on what is acceptable and what is not acceptable in the World Assembly today. Everyone is entitled in an opinion, but going around and telling new world assembly authors that something is not acceptable even though it clearly has been in the no so far past I highly discourage.

I am stating the metric I base my opinion on, Feux. How I vote and try to get other people to vote. The public's will is both irrelevant to my own views, and usually the public votes pretty idiotically on SC issues.

[Feux]

Everything is debatable in the World Assembly, however, I was addressing this attitude of entitle that some people seem to crown themselves with on what is acceptable and what is not acceptable in the World Assembly today. Everyone is entitled in an opinion, but going around and telling new world assembly authors that something is not acceptable even though it clearly has been in the no so far past I highly discourage.

I am stating the metric I base my opinion on, Feux. How I vote and try to get other people to vote. The public's will is both irrelevant to my own views, and usually the public votes pretty idiotically on SC issues.

Oh I know. Some people don't though, just making a point.

[Glen-Rhodes]

Writing Resolutions isn't enough to get a commendation. Not alone.

Seemed to be enough for me.

The only problem I have with commending Connopolis is that they haven't been around in quite some time...

[Sanctaria]

Connopolis = Sciongrad.

I thought this was common knowledge. If not, sorry for outing you, buddy

[Sciongrad]

Connopolis = Sciongrad.

I thought this was common knowledge. If not, sorry for outing you, buddy

It's all good, Sanc. My attempts to conceal that have really waned over time, anyway, and quite a few people already knew.

[Cerian Quilor]

Writing Resolutions isn't enough to get a commendation. Not alone.

Seemed to be enough for me.

Because the World Assembly voting population is a collection of mindless sheep determined to water down both the Condemn and Commend resolution catagories.

[Mahaj]

Seemed to be enough for me.

Because the World Assembly voting population is a collection of mindless sheep determined to water down both the Condemn and Commend resolution catagories.

Right. I can't believe the gall of those sheep, rewarding people for actually being good at what they do. Sickens me, just absolutely sick.

[Cerian Quilor]

Because the World Assembly voting population is a collection of mindless sheep determined to water down both the Condemn and Commend resolution catagories.

Right. I can't believe the gall of those sheep, rewarding people for actually being good at what they do. Sickens me, just absolutely sick.

They're giving people commendations for having a keyboard.

[Everbeek]

Right. I can't believe the gall of those sheep, rewarding people for actually being good at what they do. Sickens me, just absolutely sick.

They're giving people commendations for having a keyboard.

If that was the case, where is my Commend? WHERE IS IT?

[Cerian Quilor]

We both know that it is coming.

[Elias Greyjoy]

Right. I can't believe the gall of those sheep, rewarding people for actually being good at what they do. Sickens me, just absolutely sick.

They're giving people commendations for having a keyboard.

But it's a really nice keyboard.