NATION

PASSWORD

[draft]Condemn Auralia

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.

Advertisement

Remove ads

Post a reply
User avatar
SkyDip
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1735
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby SkyDip » Wed Feb 20, 2013 7:45 pm

I'm not arguing whether or not this is valid. I'm just saying most people vote on both IC and OOC interactions, not one strictly.
Elias Thaddeus Greyjoy, WA Ambassador of SkyDip
Read my Guide to the Security Council, a comprehensive collection of history, tactics, and tips for the Security Council!


Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.

Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.

Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.

Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
Top
User avatar
Abacathea
Minister
 
Posts: 2151
Founded: Nov 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Abacathea » Wed Feb 20, 2013 7:53 pm

I'm going to put this on hold until such a time as more evidence to support should present itself.

And many thanks to feux and all who commented constructively.

Might stick around the SC a while though. The GA can get tiring at times, this seems less snakepit like and a lot less taxing to follow/write for.

That said I would still love to get an SC authorship lol. The red just looks so much nicer than the blue lol
G.A #236; Renewable Energy Installations (Repealed)
G.A #239; Vehicle Emissions Convention (Repealed).
G.A #257; Reducing Automobile Emissions (Repealed).
G.A #263; Uranium Mining Standards Act
G.A #279; Right of Emigration
G.A #292; Nuclear Security Convention (Co-Author)
G.A #363; Preservation of Artefacts (repealed)
S.C #118; Commend SkyDip
S.C #120; Commend Mousebumples
S.C #122; Condemn Gest
S.C #124; Commend Bears Armed
S.C #125; Commend The Bruce
S.C #126; Commend Sanctaria
S.C #131: Commend NewTexas (Co-Author)
S.C #136; Repeal "Liberate St Abbaddon" (Co-Author)
S.C #143; Commend Hobbesistan
S.C #146; Repeal "Liberate Hogwarts"
Top
User avatar
Everbeek
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 452
Founded: Jun 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Everbeek » Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:24 am

By the way it is possible to condemn Auralia for his IC actions and commend him for his OOC actions, one does not preclude the other...
The Awesomeness Formerly Known As Campinia
Cromarty wrote:Antifa, the Internationale and the Red Fleet are encased in the largest glass house in existence, and they're not throwing stones, they're firing boulders from catapults.

Big Jim P wrote:
Everbeek wrote:I never say "for god's sake", I always say "for fuck's sake", for the rest I don't care much


Fucking created most of us, so fucking IS god.
Top
User avatar
San Leggera
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13414
Founded: Dec 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby San Leggera » Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:42 am

United Federation of Canada wrote:We are discussing IC violations of GA resolutions here, which are condemnable.

OOC: In your opinion. It is not fact, nor is the same belief held by everyone here.

EDIT: fucking quote tags, how do they work?
Last edited by San Leggera on Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:43 am, edited 2 times in total.
#JusticeForGat
Flag | CoA | Map (bigger!)
I Just Want to Sell Out My Funeral
Top
User avatar
SkyDip
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1735
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby SkyDip » Thu Feb 21, 2013 3:19 pm

Everbeek wrote:By the way it is possible to condemn Auralia for his IC actions and commend him for his OOC actions, one does not preclude the other...

Also true. It is indeed possible to Commend/Condemn for OOC actions (see Tiago Silva). It just has to be worded as an IC action.
Elias Thaddeus Greyjoy, WA Ambassador of SkyDip
Read my Guide to the Security Council, a comprehensive collection of history, tactics, and tips for the Security Council!


Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.

Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.

Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.

Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
Top
User avatar
Sciongrad
Minister
 
Posts: 3060
Founded: Mar 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Sciongrad » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:48 pm

Against. Non-compliance, while poor role-playing, is not worthy of a condemnation on its own. Reaffirming the notion that condemning someone for non-compliance is acceptable will set a precedent that will permanently weaken the value of a condemnation.
Natalia Santos, Plenipotentiary and Permanent Scionite Representative to the World Assembly


Ideological Bulwark #271

Top
User avatar
Abacathea
Minister
 
Posts: 2151
Founded: Nov 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Abacathea » Fri Feb 22, 2013 6:17 pm

Sciongrad wrote:Against. Non-compliance, while poor role-playing, is not worthy of a condemnation on its own. Reaffirming the notion that condemning someone for non-compliance is acceptable will set a precedent that will permanently weaken the value of a condemnation.


Hence why this was already said it was being dropped.
G.A #236; Renewable Energy Installations (Repealed)
G.A #239; Vehicle Emissions Convention (Repealed).
G.A #257; Reducing Automobile Emissions (Repealed).
G.A #263; Uranium Mining Standards Act
G.A #279; Right of Emigration
G.A #292; Nuclear Security Convention (Co-Author)
G.A #363; Preservation of Artefacts (repealed)
S.C #118; Commend SkyDip
S.C #120; Commend Mousebumples
S.C #122; Condemn Gest
S.C #124; Commend Bears Armed
S.C #125; Commend The Bruce
S.C #126; Commend Sanctaria
S.C #131: Commend NewTexas (Co-Author)
S.C #136; Repeal "Liberate St Abbaddon" (Co-Author)
S.C #143; Commend Hobbesistan
S.C #146; Repeal "Liberate Hogwarts"
Top
Previous
Post a reply

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Advertisement

Remove ads