[DRAFT] Repeal Condemn True North

[Welsh Cowboy]

As one of the players behind True North, I don't really care if this resolution is repealed or not. I mean, it didn't do anything...

Yeah, I disagreed with the resolution at the time, but I just don't see why the SC should be bothered with this issue again. True North is pretty much dead anyway...

[United Federation of Canada]

As one of the players behind True North, I don't really care if this resolution is repealed or not. I mean, it didn't do anything...

Yeah, I disagreed with the resolution at the time, but I just don't see why the SC should be bothered with this issue again. True North is pretty much dead anyway...

And since True North is going to die, the condemnation should be repealed.

We repealed Quote of the Day's commendation, as they no longer exist.

We repealed Liberate Nationalist Union as they are now a founded region, and the liberation would be pointless.

This is also a pointless condemnation and it should be stricken from the record.

[SkyDip]

We repealed Quote of the Day's commendation, as they no longer exist.

We did not repeal Commend TQOTD solely because the nation CTEd, but because there were many factual inaccuracies in the proposal. Apples ≠ oranges.

[United Federation of Canada]

We repealed Quote of the Day's commendation, as they no longer exist.

We did not repeal Commend TQOTD solely because the nation CTEd, but because there were many factual inaccuracies in the proposal. Apples ≠ oranges.

Would you have repealed it, if they still existed?

Somehow I think not.

Therefore it was a pointless commendation and it was stricken from the record, as this one should be.

[SkyDip]

We did not repeal Commend TQOTD solely because the nation CTEd, but because there were many factual inaccuracies in the proposal. Apples ≠ oranges.

Would you have repealed it, if they still existed?

Somehow I think not.

Therefore it was a pointless commendation and it was stricken from the record, as this one should be.

What you think is irrelevant, because you obviously do not hold all the facts on that matter. I did, in fact, propose my first draft of the repeal while TQOTD was still around. That Commendation was far from pointless - it was just factually inaccurate in many cases. Which does not compare to your attempt here, and the strawmen can probably end on that comparison.

[United Federation of Canada]

Would you have repealed it, if they still existed?

Somehow I think not.

Therefore it was a pointless commendation and it was stricken from the record, as this one should be.

What you think is irrelevant, because you obviously do not hold all the facts on that matter. I did, in fact, propose my first draft of the repeal while TQOTD was still around. That Commendation was far from pointless - it was just factually inaccurate in many cases. Which does not compare to your attempt here, and the strawmen can probably end on that comparison.

And the condemnation of True North wasn't full of innaccuracies?

Lets see here:

NOTING, the region's high population has been achieved through 'puppet flooding' nations into the region.

Okay, and why does this concern the Security Council?

DISAPPOINTED, that regions committed to either recruiting new nations to their own region or welcoming new nations that join the Pacifics have been pushed down population rankings due to the actions of said region.

Oh boo-hoo. It was for one whole update.

BELIEVING that the sheer number of puppet states negatively affects the world and can hamper other nations attempting to travel with speed.

Hardly.

THEREFORE, punishing the region that has committed the above offence the most as a note that the Security Council disagrees with these actions.

Once again why does the Security Council care about such matters?

[Welsh Cowboy]

Honestly, though, we don't care about the condemnation. I mean, seriously, the project is done...

Thanks for trying to fix the SC, but I just don't see the need to spend 4 days voting on this.

[United Federation of Canada]

Honestly, though, we don't care about the condemnation. I mean, seriously, the project is done...

Thanks for trying to fix the SC, but I just don't see the need to spend 4 days voting on this.

The condemnation is pointless, and should not be allowed to remain on the books.

[Cerian Quilor]

What is the point of any condemnation?

[United Federation of Canada]

What is the point of any condemnation?

The express "Shock and Dismay at a Nation" in character.

There was nothing in character about this condemnation.

[Cerian Quilor]

There are numerous resolutions - condemn The Black Hawks or Condemn the Black Riders, for example that are not in-character.

RP is not the only world in NS.

[Cromarty]

But it is the only legitimate world in the SC. Hence Rule 4.

[Cerian Quilor]

And Condemn True North didn't violate Rule 4.

[Cromarty]

And Condemn True North didn't violate Rule 4.

Oh indeed, I'm not defending his point at all, just saying the Security Council is specificly RP.

[Sedgistan]

Not really, and please return to debating the proposal.

[Milograd]

I agree that True North's condemnation should be repealed, but I don't believe that this proposal is ready to be submitted.

REALIZING that no particular region was actually harmed by the actions of True North,

The word "particular" is superfluous here. One could argue that "actually" is also unnecessary, but I won't.

CONCERNED the Security Council has carried out a grave injustice, by condemning a region that has caused no harm to the international community,

Calling the condemnation a "grave injustice" seems hyperbolic and overly apologetic to me. I also don't believe that the comma after "injustice" is necessary.

BELIEVING that True North's true goal was to earn a condemnation from the Security Council for it's actions, thus is not worthy of condemnation by the Security Council,

"It's" is a contraction, and does not denote possession. "Its" is the word that you're looking for.

I don't believe that TN intended to be condemned for making a large puppet region, and we have no reason to believe that that was their motive for creating their puppets. If it was, you should probably provide us with evidence for your claim. Also, I would add "and is" before "thus."

DISGUSTED that the Security Council has awarded a "Shiny Badge" to a region that has done nothing worthy of a condemnation by the Security Council,

I would omit the proposal's statement about the "shiny badge" if I were you. You've already said that the condemnation was unjust. If you're trying to suggest that a condemnation provides TN with undeserved attention, which is an entirely different sentiment, the proposal should say that forthright. Additionally, your repeated usage of the phrase "condemnation by the Security Council" doesn't read well because it is awfully wordy. It could easily be shortened to "condemnation."