NATION

PASSWORD

[DRAFT]Condemn The Society of Meshuggah Ducks

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.
User avatar
Haile Selassie V
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 63
Founded: Dec 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

[DRAFT]Condemn The Society of Meshuggah Ducks

Postby Haile Selassie V » Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:23 pm

Condemn The Society of Meshuggah Ducks

Category: Condemnation
Nominee: The Society of Meshuggah Ducks

Reaffirming Security Council Resolution #105: Condemn True North,

Citing this resolution as legal precedence for the condemnation of regions that artificially swell their populations with extensive puppet flooding,

Noting that the The Society of Meshuggah Ducks has for some time engaged in this condemnable practice,

Believing that such practice of puppet flooding negatively affects the effectiveness of legal recruiting in the feeder regions while the said puppets are being created and moved,

Punishes The Society for Meshuggah Ducks for extensive puppet flooding,

Reaffirms the Security Council’s opposition to this practice.

Hereby, condemns The Society for Meshuggah Ducks.
Last edited by Haile Selassie V on Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
SkyDip
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1735
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby SkyDip » Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:25 pm

Is house of cards an SC rule? It should be.

EDIT: For clarity's sake, I stand against this proposal because you are basically piggy-backing on Vinage's Condemnation without any actual input of your own. It's basically plagiarism save the fact that you referenced his proposal and are targeting a different region.
Last edited by SkyDip on Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Elias Thaddeus Greyjoy, WA Ambassador of SkyDip
Read my Guide to the Security Council, a comprehensive collection of history, tactics, and tips for the Security Council!


Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.

Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.

Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.

Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.

User avatar
Haile Selassie V
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 63
Founded: Dec 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Haile Selassie V » Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:59 pm

SkyDip wrote:Is house of cards an SC rule? It should be.

EDIT: For clarity's sake, I stand against this proposal because you are basically piggy-backing on Vinage's Condemnation without any actual input of your own. It's basically plagiarism save the fact that you referenced his proposal and are targeting a different region.

I see your point, though my reason for opposition is different. Vanage opposed the negative effects of True North's puppet flooding on the international community while I am more focused on its effects on recruitment.

User avatar
Tim-Opolis
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6182
Founded: Feb 17, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Tim-Opolis » Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:15 am

Opposed. There's no need to glorify these puppet pumpers any more than unnecessary. Let's not be setting a trend that making a huge puppet dump will get you an SC Badge or every SC Badge Wannabe will just go make a 3000+ nation puppetdump and expect a Condemnation.
Want to be a hero? Join The Grey Wardens - Help Us Save Nationstates
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Commended by Security Council Resolution #420 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Author of SC#74, SC #203, SC #222, and SC #238 | Co-Author of SC#191
Founder of Spiritus | Three-Time Delegate of Osiris | Pharaoh of the Islamic Republics of Iran | Hero of Greece
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic

User avatar
The Great Destruction
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 398
Founded: Nov 08, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Great Destruction » Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:12 am

1) House of cards doesn't apply. (And I hope it never will, sorry Skyp)

2) Precedence should be cited in your argument not your proposal. Use the actual reasons why these actions are condemnation worthy not just that someone else got condemned for it. (at least not in the proposal)

3) Also try showing how this instance of puppet flooding is damaging to a certain region, ethic, or way of life, because otherwise it is a leagle thing to do. Are there an extensive amount of them? Are they use for unsavory purposes? etc.


Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Destructive Government Economic System

Advertisement

Remove ads