Ardchoille wrote:I don't think either of the Mad Sheep Railgun proposals belong in this thread. They're both legal.
I ruled, in the Commend Goobergunchia thread. that it was legal to mention resolutions of a previous body, as there was no possibility that those resolutions would ever be negated by repeals, so the first one stands.
Possibly the second one could be queried on the "no proposals on matters that could be resolved in Moderation", but he's not asking that the name be removed (which would be a Moderation matter), he's just condemning it as a choice.
Silly? Well, I'm not going to be the one to tell the GA that commending one of its predecessor's historic proposals is silly. And the second one merely condemns a nation for an action, which is well within the ambit of the category.
I would assume the first is legal though silly too... But your saying it is totally legal to condemn my region because it happens to have the same name as another body?! I'm not worried, merely surprised... Lol...