NationStates

Condemn Bananaistan
Category: Condemnation
Nominee: Bananaistan
Proposed by: Philipastan
ID: philipastan_1618333585

The World Assembly,

Noting that Bananaistan is a bitch,

Hereby:

1. Condemns Bananaistan

Rules broken: Refers to Bananaistan as a singular person (rule 2b), site rules (flaming)

The World Assembly Security Council,

Noting that the region of Chicken overlords contains thousands of puppet states,

Disappointed that the founder of the region uses many puppet states to keep their region on the top,

Worried that this will draw many new nations away from quality regions,

Noticing that the sheer number of nations slows the rotation of the planet, therefore, slowing all daily operations down,

Disgusted that the puppet governments do nothing but let their citizens issues go unnoticed,

Horrified that Chicken overlords are currently corrupting the world census reports,

Seeing that the satellite states of Chicken overlords have no creativity in naming and that can be seen easily,

Feeling that this is the right thing to do,

We Hereby Condemn Chicken overlords

Condemn United Engiresco
Noticing that United Engiresco is a dictatorship;

Hereby Condemns United Engiresco.

Security Council Proposal
ID: goundirk_1618873136

Repeal: “Condemn Koem Kab”
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.

Category: Repeal

Resolution: SC#287

Proposed by: Goundirk

Security Council Resolution #287 “Condemn Koem Kab” shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The Security Council,

ACKNOWLEDGING our previous resolution,

CONFUSED at the fact the previous resolution managed to pass despite what it meant for everyone else,

DISPLEASED at the double standard held and the lack of enforcement of this resolution upon any other nation,

ADMITTING that our punishment against the nation of Koem Kab was disproportionate to their actions,

TAKING the following steps to undo our mistakes:
1) Repealing the condemnation of the nation of Koem Kab.
2) Revisiting our views upon art and how we should no longer hold this double standard against nations.

AWARE of the negative effects of hoarding artworks, intentional or otherwise,

REMINDING the world that they are allowed to do what they please with their owned artworks as long as it does not violate international law,

ASSURING the world that we will not continue to act against the ownership of art unless it is a severe threat that would require WA intervention.

FURTHERMORE reminding the earth that the nation of Koem Kab is not the sole reason for art inflation and therefore should not be punished for it,

MOVING ON from this and re-examining our policies on fair punishment against members of the WA,

Hereby repeals the condemnation of Koem Kab.

SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: cccp_2_0_1619542949


Condemn Big Boyz
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.

Category: Condemnation

Nominee (nation): Big Boyz

Proposed by: CCCP 2 0

---

It has appeared that nation called Big Boyz, has sunken into the darkest waters of repressive dictatorship.

Revealed: Big Boyz has one of the highest levels of corruption in the world, and the government does not send corrupt officials to court.

Brought to light, that nation has abolished the court system.

Reminded, that both civil rights, and political freedoms are outlawed, including the right to protest, marriage, and freedom of religion.

Shuddering to recall, that people are NOT allowed to live until the old age, leave, or enter the country.

Astonished to find out, about the allowance of the child labor.

Disgusted to reveal, that sports, internet, computers, and aircraft are banned.

Shocked to discover, that government implemented, DNA, and compulsory organ harvesting!

Recalling, that corporal punishment is allowed in school.

Pointing out, that independent press, piercing, automobiles, and guns are banned!

Everything above condemns the Big Boyz.

Tinhampton wrote:Would it be a violation of Rule 1d to assert that a nation can be Condemned (or Commended) by the actions they have taken (i.e. "Everything above"), rather than by the World Assembly or its Security Council?

The Rules wrote:The action that a resolution does (Condemning, Commending, Liberating or Repealing) does not have to be attributed to any body - however, if it is, it must be attributed to an appropriate authority - ie. the World Assembly or The Security Council. A proposal cannot have "Sedgistan Hereby Condemns Jakker" as its operative clause.

Seconds ago: Sedgistan: Illegal — Rule 1d - viewtopic.php?p=38597020#p38597020

Tinhampton wrote:

SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: cccp_2_0_1619542949

(Image)
Condemn Big Boyz
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.

Category: Condemnation

Nominee (nation): Big Boyz

Proposed by: CCCP 2 0

---

It has appeared that nation called Big Boyz, has sunken into the darkest waters of repressive dictatorship.

Revealed: Big Boyz has one of the highest levels of corruption in the world, and the government does not send corrupt officials to court.

Brought to light, that nation has abolished the court system.

Reminded, that both civil rights, and political freedoms are outlawed, including the right to protest, marriage, and freedom of religion.

Shuddering to recall, that people are NOT allowed to live until the old age, leave, or enter the country.

Astonished to find out, about the allowance of the child labor.

Disgusted to reveal, that sports, internet, computers, and aircraft are banned.

Shocked to discover, that government implemented, DNA, and compulsory organ harvesting!

Recalling, that corporal punishment is allowed in school.

Pointing out, that independent press, piercing, automobiles, and guns are banned!

Everything above condemns the Big Boyz.

Would it be a violation of Rule 1d to assert that a nation can be Condemned (or Commended) by the actions they have taken (i.e. "Everything above"), rather than by the World Assembly or its Security Council?

Repeal: "Commend Deadeye Jack"
Proposed by: Sauquistan
ID: sauquistan_1622039989

Security Council Resolution #353 “Commend Deadeye Jack” shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

We have to repel this proposal since it is a threat to nations with expanded civil liberties and human rights, so we ask that it be deactivated, because otherwise nations will be affected by this proposal and their civil rights and political freedom will be will turn RED

Drew Durrnil wrote:

Repeal: "Commend Deadeye Jack"
Proposed by: Sauquistan
ID: sauquistan_1622039989

Security Council Resolution #353 “Commend Deadeye Jack” shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

We have to repel this proposal since it is a threat to nations with expanded civil liberties and human rights, so we ask that it be deactivated, because otherwise nations will be affected by this proposal and their civil rights and political freedom will be will turn RED

Rule violated: Game mechanics

Bears Armed wrote:

Drew Durrnil wrote:

Repeal: "Commend Deadeye Jack"
Proposed by: Sauquistan
ID: sauquistan_1622039989

Security Council Resolution #353 “Commend Deadeye Jack” shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

We have to repel this proposal since it is a threat to nations with expanded civil liberties and human rights, so we ask that it be deactivated, because otherwise nations will be affected by this proposal and their civil rights and political freedom will be will turn RED

Rule violated: Game mechanics

Meta-gaming, actually.

The Unified Missourtama States wrote:https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_view_proposal/id=sauquistan_1622039989

Has been incorrectly ruled illegal because of 1d, but it does have an operative clause, "Security Council Resolution #353 “Commend Deadeye Jack” shall be struck out and rendered null and void."

I understand it may be illegal under 2a or 4b, but needs to be reviewed.

The Unified Missourtama States wrote:https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_view_proposal/id=sauquistan_1622039989

Has been incorrectly ruled illegal because of 1d, but it does have an operative clause, "Security Council Resolution #353 “Commend Deadeye Jack” shall be struck out and rendered null and void."

I understand it may be illegal under 2a or 4b, but needs to be reviewed.

Commend Arminland
A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a nation or region.

Category: Commendation

Nominee: Arminland

Proposed by: Arminland

Commend me please yes commend me please yes please commend me commend meeeeeee