Posted:
Thu Aug 16, 2018 3:54 am
by Kuriko
New Min wrote:https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_view_proposal/id=wi_nation_1534404712
ID: wi_nation_1534404712
Commend The Great New York Nation
A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a nation or region.
Category: Commendation
Nominee: The great new york nation
Proposed by: Wi nation
I was asked to propose this but I think they are doing a good job
Rule 3 comes up to my mind, but you guys can probably find a hell of a lot of other violations.
Just R3 and R4(d) in my opinion
Condemn The Black Hawks 5 Million Times
Posted:
Mon Sep 10, 2018 11:23 am
by Nintendo Switch Parental Controls
The many nations of the World Assembly,
KNOWING that The Black Hawks deserve even more condemnations
REALIZING that The Black Hawks like being condemned
FIGURING that what The Black Hawks really needs is so many Condemnations that they realize what Condemnations really mean.
HEREBY Condemns The Black Hawks 5 Million Times.
Posted:
Mon Sep 10, 2018 2:35 pm
by Wrapper
Do not post joke proposals in this thread.
Posted:
Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:29 am
by Lord Dominator
https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_vi ... 1537286695Commend Krusty Krushers
A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a nation or region.
Category: Commendation
Nominee: Krusty Krushers
Proposed by: The Republic of New Alabama
Recognizing the reigon Krusty Krushers as a great contribution to the roleplay aspect.
Observing their uncanny ability to problem solve, and their lack of bans within the reigon.
Viewing the great leadership by the founder and many others.
Officially recognizes and commends the Krusty Krushers for their unity, dedication, and poise to be part of the NationStates World Assembly.
R4(c) if I'm not mistaken, with the inclusion of 'roleplay'
Posted:
Sat Sep 22, 2018 7:18 am
by Kuriko
https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_vi ... 1537610175Security Council Proposal
ID: victoria_the_great_1537610175
Condemn Federatsiya
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.
Category: Condemnation
Nominee: Federatsiya
Proposed by: Victoria the Great
The World Assembly,
NOTICING some weird actions that Federatsiya had done in his old The Communist Bloc to his new region: The Great Red Union.
UNDERSTANDING that he is not a real communist state. He is a fascist state as his factbooks contain songs that not are all real from Communist things.
KNOWING that Federatsiya is a very rude nation in every region. He even insulting players from RMB and another kinds just as telegram offensive words and being not friendly to the region.
Hereby, Condemning Federatsiya.
R4(b), use of "his" and "he"
Posted:
Sun Sep 23, 2018 1:11 pm
by Ransium
Kuriko wrote:https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_view_proposal/id=ladtanderan_1537724956
Security Council Proposal
ID: ladtanderan_1537724956
Repeal: “Commend Crazy Girl”
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.
Category: Repeal
Resolution: SC#49
Proposed by: Ladtanderan
Security Council Resolution #49 “Commend Crazy girl” shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
Why do we need craziness? It bothers other people.
R2(d), R3, R4(d)
Seems like spam pretty much, I discard it.
Posted:
Sun Sep 23, 2018 4:35 pm
by Kuriko
https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_vi ... 1537742731Security Council Proposal
ID: the_vooperian_ssr_1537742731
Liberate The United Federations
A resolution to strike down Delegate-imposed barriers to free entry in a region.
Category: Liberation
Nominee (region): The United Federations
Proposed by: The Vooperian SSR
I bring to your attention, as a member of The United Federations, The UF is no longer united as it says to be. The United Federations is slowly dividing and the Federations within The United Federations are in a state of war and division. Without further a do, this is my proposal for Liberation.
Considering the nations of The United Federations are so split between hundreds of nations at war on the extra-large planet of Spook Vooper in a distant system, I say with all nations to vote yes.
Stating that this process will keep repeating and will not stop, that would make it necessary.
Claiming that the divide of hundreds, thousands and even millions of nations diplomatically, ideologically, and general politically, few nations keep stable leading to almost 1000 civil wars a year, 100,000 yearly riots per nation , and the fact that nations are constantly going against The Vooperian Constitution.
To all the World Assembly and others, WA nations and delegates alike, I hope you agree with the text.
Yes, it is short.
R3?, R4(d), R4(b) (I'm not sure if "I" falls under R4(b))
Posted:
Sun Sep 23, 2018 6:29 pm
by Wrapper
Not really, just R3 and R4(d).
Posted:
Tue Sep 25, 2018 5:59 am
by RiderSyl
Repeal "Liberate Confederation of Corrupt Dictators"
Category: Repeal | Target: SC #263 | Proposed By: Kaboomlandia
The Security Council,
Appreciating the general sentiment by the World Assembly Security Council to oppose fascism in its many forms,
Noting that the region of Confederation of Corrupt Dictators was recently liberated with the intent of setting it up to be raided by anti-fascist forces should the founder ever cease to exist,
Pointing out that this is a completely pointless resolution for the following reasons:
- The regional founder is active, and is the World Assembly Delegate for the region.
- The founder can lock down the region any time they like, and this password is completely unaffected by a Liberation proposal.
- Even if the founder should ever cease to exist, the CCD has a backup Delegate waiting in the wings with the potential to earn up to 120 endorsements - the amount on the current Delegate - making an attempted raid a pointless exercise, since the largest single jump ever was 84 raiders by a full-strength CAIN against the NSIA in October 2016.
- All a liberation resolution would accomplish is causing the CCD to tighten up their security standards and diligence, ironically making a raid even less likely to ever occur.
Realizing that this resolution is simply giving free publicity to the CCD, which is not desirable,
Disgusted that this practice of authoring useless liberations against regions with founders has become common,
Wishing to devote no more spilled ink to this region than is necessary,
Hereby repeals Security Council Resolution #263.
https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_vi ... 1537848091R2(d) [Doesn't address anything in the targeted resolution, only refutes points that it's bringing up on its own]
Posted:
Tue Sep 25, 2018 6:26 am
by Frisbeeteria
RiderSyl wrote:R2(d) [Doesn't address anything in the targeted resolution, only refutes points that it's bringing up on its own]
I'm not seeing it that way. There are a couple of mentions of the use of fascism, plus the bit about the founder. That said, it's a bad repeal and I hope it fails. I just don't see it being a case for moderation removal.
Posted:
Sat Sep 29, 2018 10:26 am
by Kuriko
https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_vi ... 1538228738Security Council Proposal
ID: blueflarst_1538228738
Commend Blueflarst
A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a nation or region.
Category: Commendation
Nominee: Blueflarst
Proposed by: Blueflarst
Seeing the good HDI of Blueflarst.
Realizing that Blueflarst without being a democracy archieved 89 years as average span.
Observing the quality of Blueflarst healthcare and the low crime rate inside the nation.
Applauding the governement efforts to illustrate the people in the well funded education system.
Realizing that Blueflarst is a diplomatic nation which tries to do the World Assembly a better international place.
Applauding the absence of racism, sexism and other discriminative policies in the country and the rights of the native peoples in the Blueflarst colonies.
Surprised at the high income of the Blueflarst poorest citizens.
Being noticed of the Blueflarst eco friendly policies.
Commends Bluefcrazy as nation which cares about his enviroment, people and international peace efforts.
Wrapper has this ruled legal, but I see it as an R4(d) violation. I think. Unless it is written from the WAs perspective, and I'm just going crazy.
Posted:
Sat Sep 29, 2018 10:59 am
by Tinhampton
Kuriko wrote:Commend Blueflarst
The final line "Commends Blueflarst as nation which cares about his enviroment, people and international peace efforts." Would referring to Blueflarst as a "he" fall foul of R4b?
Posted:
Sat Sep 29, 2018 11:11 am
by Kuriko
Ransium wrote:Kuriko wrote:https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_view_proposal/id=blueflarst_1538228738
Security Council Proposal
ID: blueflarst_1538228738
Commend Blueflarst
A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a nation or region.
Category: Commendation
Nominee: Blueflarst
Proposed by: Blueflarst
Seeing the good HDI of Blueflarst.
Realizing that Blueflarst without being a democracy archieved 89 years as average span.
Observing the quality of Blueflarst healthcare and the low crime rate inside the nation.
Applauding the governement efforts to illustrate the people in the well funded education system.
Realizing that Blueflarst is a diplomatic nation which tries to do the World Assembly a better international place.
Applauding the absence of racism, sexism and other discriminative policies in the country and the rights of the native peoples in the Blueflarst colonies.
Surprised at the high income of the Blueflarst poorest citizens.
Being noticed of the Blueflarst eco friendly policies.
Commends Bluefcrazy as nation which cares about his enviroment, people and international peace efforts.
Wrapper has this ruled legal, but I see it as an R4(d) violation. I think. Unless it is written from the WAs perspective, and I'm just going crazy.
I don’t see the problem?
It doesn't have "the security council" or "the world assembly" at the beginning, although that's just me I guess.
Tinhampton wrote:Kuriko wrote:Commend Blueflarst
The final line "Commends Blueflarst as nation which cares about his enviroment, people and international peace efforts." Would referring to Blueflarst as a "he" fall foul of R4b?
Oof, missed that.
Posted:
Sat Sep 29, 2018 1:15 pm
by Ransium
R4b for sure not seeing it as R4d. Fris seems to agree although he wrote the wrong rule.