https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_vi ... 1522996934Security Council Proposal
ID: castle_heaven_1522996934
Condemn Union Of KingMakers
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.
Category: Condemnation
Nominee: Union of KingMakers
Proposed by: Castle Heaven
To the honorable Security Council,
I would like to enlighten the NationState's SC regarding the new entrepreneur of Raiding industry Union of KingMakers, It is fairly a new region however under it's leader KingMaker's watch many helpless region has fallen into victim. They are allied with The Invaders, It's like they are identical twines when it come to raiding. My old nation was in the region called Binsport Republic, which is still under their occupation it's been months and nothing has been done. They are always looking out for innocent prey.
As far as I have observed they deny democracy and advocate Monarchism, And suppress freedom of speech and violent way of conquering other's regions and destroy history and communities with the help of their raiding allies.Where they feel proud of their cruelty.
So we urge the all NationStates members to condemn the young destructive region Union of KingMakers for the safeguard and betterment of the Nationstates community.
Thank you all for your kind support.
By my determination, this proposal is illegal as it violates: Rules 3, 4(d)
R3: My interpretation of "NationStates members" is the reason why I feel that R3 is violated, i.e. I do not see "NationStates members" and "WA member nations" as one in the same due to membership being voluntary, and hence I deem the second-to-last clause as more so calling for a boycott-of-sorts than a security council condemnation.
R4(d): The proposal is not written from the perspective of the World Assembly, but rather it is written as if addressed to the Security Council.
Needless to say, the spelling and grammatical errors are things that I dislike but they are not enforceable issues in accordance with the rules for security council proposals. I would also argue that this proposal violated proposal basics, but that is something I do not intend to throw around as I do not fully understand in what manner Ransium uses that terminology.