Illegal SC proposals - post them here

by **Kaboomlandia** » Wed May 13, 2015 10:56 am

SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: united_states_of_toxic_1431536885

Commend Sciongrad

A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a nation or region.

Category: Commendation

Nominee: Sciongrad

Proposed by: United States of Toxic

Description: let us all commend sciongrad for his heroic efforts to make the world a better place!

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 93 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 10 hours

R2, R3.

by **We Are Not the NSA** » Thu May 14, 2015 9:33 am

Condemn Uqbaristan

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.

Category: Condemnation

Nominee: Uqbaristan

Proposed by: Smitty Jebs

Description: We need to Condemn The Imperium of Uqbaristan

He Constantly causes problems in his region.
He Previously helped the back riders take over 2 regions.
He is the leader of his regions Nazi Party.
and he has been banned from the wa for "cheating".

R4

by **Crazy girl** » Thu May 14, 2015 11:07 am

Rule 2c, 3 and 4 actually.

by **We Are Not the NSA** » Thu May 14, 2015 11:56 am

Crazy girl wrote:Rule 2c, 3 and 4 actually.

Sorry, I posted before class and didn't have time to check the whole proposal.

by **Frisbeeteria** » Thu May 14, 2015 1:08 pm

We Are Not the NSA wrote:Sorry, I posted before class and didn't have time to check the whole proposal.

Really? The "whole proposal" was effectively 4 lines.

We don't give out awards for first post or fastest post. Wait until you have time to properly post, or let someone else get it.

by **The Millennium Battalion** » Thu May 14, 2015 3:26 pm

https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_vi ... 1431641159

This proposal is to "liberate" the region I reside in. However, my region does not have a password and, per the rules for when a liberation should be used, the proposal is not legal.

by **Sedgistan** » Thu May 14, 2015 11:20 pm

There aren't any rules on "when a liberation should be used". It's not illegal to try to Liberate a region that doesn't have a password.

The proposal is illegal for other reasons though.

by **Crazy girl** » Thu May 14, 2015 11:37 pm

Frisbeeteria wrote:
We Are Not the NSA wrote:Sorry, I posted before class and didn't have time to check the whole proposal.

Really? The "whole proposal" was effectively 4 lines.

We don't give out awards for first post or fastest post. Wait until you have time to properly post, or let someone else get it.

Oh grumpy old man, at least he got that it was illegal, no worries

by **Kaboomlandia** » Mon May 18, 2015 12:38 pm

SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: pheeblan_1431977813

Condemn DEN

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.

Category: Condemnation

Nominee: DEN

Proposed by: Pheeblan

Description: This proposal condemns DEN for the reasons below

They have staged coups against multiple regions including; PCA, The United Isles and more

This is why I propose that the WA condemn DEN

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 94 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 8 hours

R3?, R4.

by **Sedgistan** » Mon May 18, 2015 1:53 pm

Yup, both. Rule 4 for the "I", Rule 3 for the "propose" - you need to actually Condemn in the operative clause, not just propose it.

by **Todd McCloud** » Wed May 20, 2015 12:40 pm

SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: stovenia_1432148934

Repeal "Condemn the Pacific"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.

Category: Repeal

Resolution: SC#177

Proposed by: Stovenia

Description: WA Security Council Resolution #177: Condemn the Pacific shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: This act is biased in an effort to destroy a region where peace flurishes.

Approvals: 1 (Wintariu)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 93 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 8 hours

Rule 3.

by **Kaboomlandia** » Wed May 20, 2015 12:43 pm

Todd McCloud wrote:
SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: stovenia_1432148934

Repeal "Condemn the Pacific"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.

Category: Repeal

Resolution: SC#177

Proposed by: Stovenia

Description: WA Security Council Resolution #177: Condemn the Pacific shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: This act is biased in an effort to destroy a region where peace flurishes.

Approvals: 1 (Wintariu)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 93 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 8 hours

Rule 3.

Also R2 - doesn't address original

by **We Are Not the NSA** » Wed May 20, 2015 3:22 pm

Commend El Fiji Grande

A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a nation or region.

Category: Commendation

Nominee: El Fiji Grande

Proposed by: SSV Normandy SR-2

Description: RECOGNIZING the player of El Fiji Granda as a leader in various aspects of NationStates.

OBSERVING his tireless efforts in maintaining order, stability, and leadership in The former region of Strategos Prime and the current region of International Northwestern Union.

VIEWING his knowledge, leadership in NationStates to always find a diplomatic solution, both in region and out. He made many friends in the NS community and his extreme passion for NationStates and the regions he was in shows as his time of being a WA Delegate.

OFFICALLY praises the player behind the nation of El Fiji Grande and recognizes his achievements with a commendation from the World Assembly. We of International Northwestern Union would like to thank him for his service as our former delegate and a friend

Several R4b violations(I count 11), R4c for "We of International Northwestern Union", and I'm pretty sure R3.

by **Kaboomlandia** » Wed May 20, 2015 7:58 pm

Yup, R3. This:

OFFICALLY praises the player behind the nation of El Fiji Grande and recognizes his achievements with a commendation from the World Assembly. We of International Northwestern Union would like to thank him for his service as our former delegate and a friend

not only isn't a COMMEND clause, it manages to pack three R4 violations into one clause.

by **Kaboomlandia** » Fri May 22, 2015 4:28 pm

SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: bolshevikstan_1432332502

Commend The Grendels

A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a nation or region.

Category: Commendation

Nominee: The Grendels

Proposed by: Bolshevikstan

Description: Since 2002, the Inhospitable Borderlands of The Grendels has been a major nation. We have all seen them on top of the leaderboard at many times. The nation is an inspiration to many. Therefore, I believe we must commend the Grendels as a great influence to many, cementing their legacy in NationStates.

Approvals: 1 (Demoitia)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 94 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 4 hours

R3, R4

by **Bhang Bhang Duc** » Sat May 23, 2015 7:39 am

SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: island_of_the_cat_1432390400

Condemn The Fascist Union

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.

Category: Condemnation

Nominee: The Fascist Union

Proposed by: Island of the Cat

Description: I am outraged that the fascist union has space, you have to change his name. You cannot maten a union of its kind in this space. Thank you for reading my proposal and vote to change its name to union fascist!

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 93 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 1 hour

R3, R4

by **Redsward** » Sat May 23, 2015 8:17 pm

SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: vallita_1432436620

Condemn The Cherry Alliance

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.

Category: Condemnation

Nominee: The Cherry Alliance

Proposed by: Vallita

Description: Here is my draft condemnation, would you mind reading it:
Noting the various attacks The Cherry Alliance plans to make
Understanding that The Cherry Alliance has plans to expand immediately
Accepting the fact that they raided and ordered the closure of All Embassies in the Conservative Commonwealth, and were only stopped by the founder,the Principality of Hiddelborg
Believing that The Cherry Alliance plans to increase its "international presence' through occupation and raiding
Condemning The Cherry Alliance for the reasons above

Approvals: 1 (Vallita)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 94 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days

R4d. Bold is mine.

by **Kaboomlandia** » Sun May 24, 2015 7:52 am

Also, they clearly state that this is the rough draft :roll:

by **Redsward** » Sun May 24, 2015 11:30 am

Kaboomlandia wrote:Also, they clearly state that this is the rough draft

True, but that isn't illegal. Still an epic fail though

by **Kaboomlandia** » Sun May 24, 2015 12:29 pm

SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: the_stingrays_1432486593

Condemn DEN

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.

Category: Condemnation

Nominee: DEN

Proposed by: The Stingrays

Description: Description: The Security Council,

Recognizing that the raider region of DEN is a sizable region with over 140 nations and a established government,

Rebuking DEN for its notorious raiding/invading of small regions to establish forced embassies,

Noting that DEN uses raiding and invading as an attempt to gain new recruits by means of redirecting them to DEN,

Observing that DEN takes forced control of about 5 to 15 regions a day,

Acknowledging that every region has the right to its own ideals; raiding being one of them,

Asserting that most of the international community disgraces raiding and invading especially of small or new regions,

Urging the international community to help protect all regions alike from raiders,

Noting that DEN may take condemnation with pride; but still hopes to deter new nations,

Authored by: The Republic of The Stingrays
Co-Authored by: The Kingdom of Hedgehog Gecko Turtle Cat and The Republic of The Manatees

Hereby Condemns the raider region of DEN

Approvals: 3 (The Stingrays, Nava Siam, Hedgehog Gecko Turtle Cat)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 92 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 8 hours

R3. Never actually condemns them.

by **Jean Pierre Trudeau** » Sun May 24, 2015 12:38 pm

Kaboomlandia wrote:
SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: the_stingrays_1432486593

Condemn DEN

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.

Category: Condemnation

Nominee: DEN

Proposed by: The Stingrays

Description: Description: The Security Council,

Recognizing that the raider region of DEN is a sizable region with over 140 nations and a established government,

Rebuking DEN for its notorious raiding/invading of small regions to establish forced embassies,

Noting that DEN uses raiding and invading as an attempt to gain new recruits by means of redirecting them to DEN,

Observing that DEN takes forced control of about 5 to 15 regions a day,

Acknowledging that every region has the right to its own ideals; raiding being one of them,

Asserting that most of the international community disgraces raiding and invading especially of small or new regions,

Urging the international community to help protect all regions alike from raiders,

Noting that DEN may take condemnation with pride; but still hopes to deter new nations,

Authored by: The Republic of The Stingrays
Co-Authored by: The Kingdom of Hedgehog Gecko Turtle Cat and The Republic of The Manatees

Hereby Condemns the raider region of DEN

Approvals: 3 (The Stingrays, Nava Siam, Hedgehog Gecko Turtle Cat)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 92 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 8 hours

R3. Never actually condemns them.

Hereby Condemns the raider region of DEN

Do you even read these things before you attempt to point and laugh at them? You are rapidly losing credibility around here to the point people are going to start pointing and laughing at you. Maybe you should have actually read that telegram I sent you and heed some of it's advice?

by **Kaboomlandia** » Sun May 24, 2015 12:39 pm

Jean Pierre Trudeau wrote:
Kaboomlandia wrote:
SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: the_stingrays_1432486593

Condemn DEN

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.

Category: Condemnation

Nominee: DEN

Proposed by: The Stingrays

Description: Description: The Security Council,

Recognizing that the raider region of DEN is a sizable region with over 140 nations and a established government,

Rebuking DEN for its notorious raiding/invading of small regions to establish forced embassies,

Noting that DEN uses raiding and invading as an attempt to gain new recruits by means of redirecting them to DEN,

Observing that DEN takes forced control of about 5 to 15 regions a day,

Acknowledging that every region has the right to its own ideals; raiding being one of them,

Asserting that most of the international community disgraces raiding and invading especially of small or new regions,

Urging the international community to help protect all regions alike from raiders,

Noting that DEN may take condemnation with pride; but still hopes to deter new nations,

Authored by: The Republic of The Stingrays
Co-Authored by: The Kingdom of Hedgehog Gecko Turtle Cat and The Republic of The Manatees

Hereby Condemns the raider region of DEN

Approvals: 3 (The Stingrays, Nava Siam, Hedgehog Gecko Turtle Cat)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 92 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 8 hours

R3. Never actually condemns them.

Hereby Condemns the raider region of DEN

Do you even read these things before you attempt to point and laugh at them? You are rapidly losing credibility around here to the point people are going to start pointing and laughing at you. Maybe you should have actually read that telegram I sent you and heed some of it's advice?

Sorry, it was just strange that they would put it after the co-author credits. My bad.

by **Sedgistan** » Sun May 24, 2015 12:57 pm

Proposal removed as the submitter was part of a mass-multi ring (including the co-author nations).

by **Jean Pierre Trudeau** » Sun May 24, 2015 1:14 pm

Sedgistan wrote:Proposal removed as the submitter was part of a mass-multi ring (including the co-author nations).

The fact they were DEAT'd means they were running a significant amount of multies I would assume?

by **Frisbeeteria** » Sun May 24, 2015 2:18 pm

Jean Pierre Trudeau wrote:
Sedgistan wrote:Proposal removed as the submitter was part of a mass-multi ring (including the co-author nations).

The fact they were DEAT'd means they were running a significant amount of multies I would assume?

Players using multis to actively cheat, whether mass multis for raiding or defending a region; posting proposals; or repeat multis who've been banned once already; are held to a higher standard than the kids who just want to be Delegate in their own founded regions and didn't pay attention to the rules. The former get deleted, the latter just get banned.

Deliberate mass multi cheater repeaters ... well, we've got special tools for them too.

Illegal SC proposals - post them here

Who is online