NATION

PASSWORD

Illegal SC proposals - post them here

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Bhang Bhang Duc
Senator
 
Posts: 4721
Founded: Dec 17, 2003
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bhang Bhang Duc » Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:09 am

SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: perfectchaos_1456507150

Condemn DEN

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.


Category: Condemnation

Nominee: DEN

Proposed by: PerfectChaos

Description: If we don't do anything about DEN they will keep raiding our regions. People have friends in these regions and when DEN raids them, they are split up. Who are they to do that? I will keep trying to condemn DEN until it is done again.


R3 and R4b.
Former Delegate of The West Pacific. Guardian (under many Delegates) of The West Pacific. TWP's Former Minister for World Assembly Affairs and former Security Council Advisor.

The West Pacific's Official Welshman, Astronomer and Old Fart
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.

RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.

Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..

User avatar
Sedgistan
Site Director
 
Posts: 35471
Founded: Oct 20, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Sedgistan » Fri Feb 26, 2016 1:37 pm

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:
We Are Not the NSA wrote:I typed out the full post before thinking the same question. It does say "condemn %nation%" in there somewhere.

I think it just might pass muster as legal. It does say "Condemn %nation% and it does give a couple of reasons why.

Agreed.

User avatar
Bhang Bhang Duc
Senator
 
Posts: 4721
Founded: Dec 17, 2003
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bhang Bhang Duc » Sat Feb 27, 2016 1:02 pm

SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: burned_lands_1456603122

Condemn Burned lands

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.


Category: Condemnation

Nominee: Burned lands

Proposed by: Burned lands

Description: RECOGNIZING the nation's lack of care for not only its own citizens, but the world's as well

HORRIFIED by the lack of education and safety standards and the relatively low levels of income equality

DISTURBED by the nation's leader bragging about his power to oppress his people

Hereby condemns The Holy Corporation of Burned lands


R4b (bolded and underlined).

Also a self-condemnation, which while not necessarily illegal (I think) is poor form.
Last edited by Bhang Bhang Duc on Sat Feb 27, 2016 1:09 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Former Delegate of The West Pacific. Guardian (under many Delegates) of The West Pacific. TWP's Former Minister for World Assembly Affairs and former Security Council Advisor.

The West Pacific's Official Welshman, Astronomer and Old Fart
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.

RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.

Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..

User avatar
We Are Not the NSA
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1542
Founded: Nov 25, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby We Are Not the NSA » Sat Feb 27, 2016 1:46 pm

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:R4b (bolded and underlined).

Also a self-condemnation, which while not necessarily illegal (I think) is poor form.

Yep, it's legal but poor form.
\▼/We Are Not the NSA | Nohbdy | Eumaeus\▼/

Raiding HistorySecurity CouncilDear NativesTWP Raid

Retired Raider | He, Him, His | Bisexual

User avatar
Bhang Bhang Duc
Senator
 
Posts: 4721
Founded: Dec 17, 2003
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bhang Bhang Duc » Sat Feb 27, 2016 11:18 pm

SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: libertossia_1456632207

Condemn DEN

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.


Category: Condemnation

Nominee: DEN

Proposed by: Libertossia

Description: Brothers and sisters of the World Assembly Security Council:
It has recently come to pass that various regions, including my own, have been attacked and raided by DEN forces. I write this resolution to propose that all [nation]DEN activities must be stopped. Truth be told, they are ruining this game and the experience that it offers. Invading peaceful, non threatening regions for no reasons other than to further an agenda of controlling all of NationStates. I propose that the Security Council declare an open war on all DEN controlled regions, in an effort to return NationStates to peace, without an absolute joke marauding around destroying people regions. As I right this, my region, Anarchy, has been attacked. The resistance is dug in for a long fight ahead, but with the help of the Security Council, all regions that have been occupied by DEN forces can soon, at last, be returned to peace. DEN fascists will be returned to their own region, with the rest of the world accepting that aggression against the rest of the world leads to disaster, like what will be brought upon DEN. With that, I conclude this resolution to take out all DEN forces.


R3, R4b.
Former Delegate of The West Pacific. Guardian (under many Delegates) of The West Pacific. TWP's Former Minister for World Assembly Affairs and former Security Council Advisor.

The West Pacific's Official Welshman, Astronomer and Old Fart
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.

RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.

Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..

User avatar
Bhang Bhang Duc
Senator
 
Posts: 4721
Founded: Dec 17, 2003
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bhang Bhang Duc » Tue Mar 01, 2016 3:34 pm

SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: dijen_1456869633

Condemn The Royal Lagrangian

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.


Category: Condemnation

Nominee: The Royal Lagrangian

Proposed by: Dijen

Description: World Assembly,
The leaders of the Nation The Royal Lagrangian has been a pain to all nations that come in contact with them. The leaders of that nation have run regional governments in a way that pains all who work with them. Specifically:
1. Destroying many regions that other nations have spent much time and effort building.
2. Fighting against regions that have collected member nations that had been part of his regions in the past.
3. Closely following and watching the activities of nations that have preached their crimes to the world, and Releasing false information about enemies of the Lagrangian Government, in an attempt to destroy those nations.

For these reasons, we ask the World Assembly to Condemn The Matriarchy of The Royal Lagrangian.


R4b (bolded and underlined). Possibly R4d as well, the Condemn clause is not written from the SC's point of view ("we ask the World Assembly").

This guy is getting almost as many illegal Condemns as DEN.
Last edited by Bhang Bhang Duc on Tue Mar 01, 2016 3:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Former Delegate of The West Pacific. Guardian (under many Delegates) of The West Pacific. TWP's Former Minister for World Assembly Affairs and former Security Council Advisor.

The West Pacific's Official Welshman, Astronomer and Old Fart
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.

RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.

Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..

User avatar
We Are Not the NSA
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1542
Founded: Nov 25, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby We Are Not the NSA » Tue Mar 01, 2016 8:49 pm

Condemn Noxtrem

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.


Category: Condemnation

Nominee: Noxtrem

Proposed by: Burned lands

Description: ANNOYED by Noxtrem's excessive freedoms

AMUSED by his impersonation of hitler in the rmb

IMPRESSED by his innitiative to kill citizens with freedoms

APPAULED by the heavily regulated private sector that Noxtrem runs

Hereby condemns The Germanic Empire of Noxtrem

R4a and R4b.
\▼/We Are Not the NSA | Nohbdy | Eumaeus\▼/

Raiding HistorySecurity CouncilDear NativesTWP Raid

Retired Raider | He, Him, His | Bisexual

User avatar
We Are Not the NSA
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1542
Founded: Nov 25, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby We Are Not the NSA » Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:41 am

Condemn Esooreet

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.


Category: Condemnation

Nominee: Esooreet

Proposed by: Theocretes

Description: This proposal will condemn Esooreet, the founder of the infamous DEN

REASONS:

-He has led an army of Raiders known as DEN against many innocent regions and has caused unnecessary pain and annoyance

-Has unfairly ejected/suppressed/banned many nations from their own regions for no fair reason

This condemnation will hopefully make him and his army realize what they have done to many regions and nations, and will prove that the WA is brave enough to stand up to this powerful and intimidating nation.

So many R4s, and R3.

Edit: Within a minute. That's the amount of time between submission and my posting here. That's gotta be a record. :)
Last edited by We Are Not the NSA on Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
\▼/We Are Not the NSA | Nohbdy | Eumaeus\▼/

Raiding HistorySecurity CouncilDear NativesTWP Raid

Retired Raider | He, Him, His | Bisexual

User avatar
Bhang Bhang Duc
Senator
 
Posts: 4721
Founded: Dec 17, 2003
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bhang Bhang Duc » Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:53 am

I just saw the proposal and noticed a fresh post from your good self. I thought you'd probably got in. :)
Former Delegate of The West Pacific. Guardian (under many Delegates) of The West Pacific. TWP's Former Minister for World Assembly Affairs and former Security Council Advisor.

The West Pacific's Official Welshman, Astronomer and Old Fart
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.

RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.

Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..

User avatar
Leppikania
Minister
 
Posts: 2332
Founded: Apr 13, 2015
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Leppikania » Thu Mar 03, 2016 7:12 pm

SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: the_iron_union_1457056511

Condemn DEN

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.


Category: Condemnation

Nominee: DEN

Proposed by: The Iron Union

Description: DEN and their raiders are nothing but a nuisance to any region they have contact with. Even my small region of WCHS has to suffer these pompous nations. Their superiority complex knows no bounds. My region, with the help of a Good Samaritan, managed to usurp control from the officer they left behind and fly out regions flag once more. But, however, DEN will not stop their belligerent practice of sending nations into a region and harassing the current populous. It falls upon the WA Security Council to put a stop to these degenerates

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 102 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 2 hours

R4d
INTP, -4.25 Economic Left/Right, -4.1 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian, tastes like chicken.
I do use NS stats, thank you very much.
Funny Quotes
Pie charts for industries
Request an Embassy

User avatar
We Are Not the NSA
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1542
Founded: Nov 25, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby We Are Not the NSA » Thu Mar 03, 2016 7:25 pm

Leppikania wrote:
SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: the_iron_union_1457056511

Condemn DEN

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.


Category: Condemnation

Nominee: DEN

Proposed by: The Iron Union

Description: DEN and their raiders are nothing but a nuisance to any region they have contact with. Even my small region of WCHS has to suffer these pompous nations. Their superiority complex knows no bounds. My region, with the help of a Good Samaritan, managed to usurp control from the officer they left behind and fly out regions flag once more. But, however, DEN will not stop their belligerent practice of sending nations into a region and harassing the current populous. It falls upon the WA Security Council to put a stop to these degenerates

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 102 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 2 hours

R4d

R3 as well.
\▼/We Are Not the NSA | Nohbdy | Eumaeus\▼/

Raiding HistorySecurity CouncilDear NativesTWP Raid

Retired Raider | He, Him, His | Bisexual

User avatar
Bhang Bhang Duc
Senator
 
Posts: 4721
Founded: Dec 17, 2003
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bhang Bhang Duc » Thu Mar 03, 2016 11:59 pm

SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: thardan_1457064336

Condemn DEN

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.


Category: Condemnation

Nominee: DEN

Proposed by: Thardan

Description: We should Condemn DEN

DESCRIPTION - They have raided too many nations, and add wonderful, people quit the game. They have terrorized many players and have beheaded many many regions. It is time to stop there actions.

REASONS - They have sent out an army of Raiders against many innocent regions and has caused unnecessary pain and annoyance.

This condemnation should prove that they are not a match against the WA and that they need to play the game how it should be played. With small raids and more fun than anything else.


R3.
Former Delegate of The West Pacific. Guardian (under many Delegates) of The West Pacific. TWP's Former Minister for World Assembly Affairs and former Security Council Advisor.

The West Pacific's Official Welshman, Astronomer and Old Fart
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.

RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.

Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..

User avatar
Leppikania
Minister
 
Posts: 2332
Founded: Apr 13, 2015
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Leppikania » Fri Mar 04, 2016 6:48 am

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:
SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: thardan_1457064336

Condemn DEN

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.


Category: Condemnation

Nominee: DEN

Proposed by: Thardan

Description: We should Condemn DEN

DESCRIPTION - They have raided too many nations, and add wonderful, people quit the game. They have terrorized many players and have beheaded many many regions. It is time to stop there actions.

REASONS - They have sent out an army of Raiders against many innocent regions and has caused unnecessary pain and annoyance.

This condemnation should prove that they are not a match against the WA and that they need to play the game how it should be played. With small raids and more fun than anything else.


R3.

R4 too.
INTP, -4.25 Economic Left/Right, -4.1 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian, tastes like chicken.
I do use NS stats, thank you very much.
Funny Quotes
Pie charts for industries
Request an Embassy

User avatar
We Are Not the NSA
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1542
Founded: Nov 25, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby We Are Not the NSA » Fri Mar 04, 2016 8:11 am

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:
SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: thardan_1457064336

Condemn DEN

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.


Category: Condemnation

Nominee: DEN

Proposed by: Thardan

Description: We should Condemn DEN

DESCRIPTION - They have raided too many nations, and add wonderful, people quit the game. They have terrorized many players and have beheaded many many regions. It is time to stop there actions.

REASONS - They have sent out an army of Raiders against many innocent regions and has caused unnecessary pain and annoyance.

This condemnation should prove that they are not a match against the WA and that they need to play the game how it should be played. With small raids and more fun than anything else.


R3.

It was also a double submission.
\▼/We Are Not the NSA | Nohbdy | Eumaeus\▼/

Raiding HistorySecurity CouncilDear NativesTWP Raid

Retired Raider | He, Him, His | Bisexual

User avatar
Leppikania
Minister
 
Posts: 2332
Founded: Apr 13, 2015
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Leppikania » Sat Mar 05, 2016 8:27 am

SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: the_united_providences_of_perland_1457190636

Commend Sollrana

A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a nation or region.


Category: Commendation

Nominee: Sollrana

Proposed by: The United Providences of Perland

Description: Description-

This proposal hereby commends Sollrana for his pacifism, grace, and intelligence even under threat of warfare.

Further-

During a declaration of war, Sollrana continued to push for peace, and eventually signed a treaty. The nation's leaders acted calm while even under threat and ended the war with a peaceful resolution. This is why he deserves a commendation!

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 103 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 1 hour

R4
INTP, -4.25 Economic Left/Right, -4.1 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian, tastes like chicken.
I do use NS stats, thank you very much.
Funny Quotes
Pie charts for industries
Request an Embassy

User avatar
Bhang Bhang Duc
Senator
 
Posts: 4721
Founded: Dec 17, 2003
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bhang Bhang Duc » Sat Mar 05, 2016 8:47 am

Leppikania wrote:
SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: the_united_providences_of_perland_1457190636

Commend Sollrana

A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a nation or region.


Category: Commendation

Nominee: Sollrana

Proposed by: The United Providences of Perland

Description: Description-

This proposal hereby commends Sollrana for his pacifism, grace, and intelligence even under threat of warfare.

Further-

During a declaration of war, Sollrana continued to push for peace, and eventually signed a treaty. The nation's leaders acted calm while even under threat and ended the war with a peaceful resolution. This is why he deserves a commendation!

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 103 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 1 hour

R4


I'd say R3 as well. That doesn't seem like an operative clause to me.
Former Delegate of The West Pacific. Guardian (under many Delegates) of The West Pacific. TWP's Former Minister for World Assembly Affairs and former Security Council Advisor.

The West Pacific's Official Welshman, Astronomer and Old Fart
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.

RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.

Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..

User avatar
Leppikania
Minister
 
Posts: 2332
Founded: Apr 13, 2015
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Leppikania » Sat Mar 05, 2016 9:27 am

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:
Leppikania wrote:
SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: the_united_providences_of_perland_1457190636

Commend Sollrana

A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a nation or region.


Category: Commendation

Nominee: Sollrana

Proposed by: The United Providences of Perland

Description: Description-

This proposal hereby commends Sollrana for his pacifism, grace, and intelligence even under threat of warfare.

Further-

During a declaration of war, Sollrana continued to push for peace, and eventually signed a treaty. The nation's leaders acted calm while even under threat and ended the war with a peaceful resolution. This is why he deserves a commendation!

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 103 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 1 hour

R4


I'd say R3 as well. That doesn't seem like an operative clause to me.

More like it's at the beginning of the proposal.
INTP, -4.25 Economic Left/Right, -4.1 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian, tastes like chicken.
I do use NS stats, thank you very much.
Funny Quotes
Pie charts for industries
Request an Embassy

User avatar
The Constellation Islands
Attaché
 
Posts: 77
Founded: Nov 29, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The Constellation Islands » Sat Mar 05, 2016 10:49 am

Leppikania wrote:
SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: the_united_providences_of_perland_1457190636

Commend Sollrana

A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a nation or region.


Category: Commendation

Nominee: Sollrana

Proposed by: The United Providences of Perland

Description: Description-

This proposal hereby commends Sollrana for his pacifism, grace, and intelligence even under threat of warfare.

Further-

During a declaration of war, Sollrana continued to push for peace, and eventually signed a treaty. The nation's leaders acted calm while even under threat and ended the war with a peaceful resolution. This is why he deserves a commendation!

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 103 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 1 hour

R4


Gah, you beat me to it.
Regional Delegate for the Cyberius Confederation
Fornax Corporation Chief Executive
www.government.co.tci
All uses of names (such as "Mr. Nicholas Louis", derived from French scientist Nicolas Louis de Laicalle), company names, technology, or any other possible copyrighted term, name, or image used on NationStates by this nation is strictly for entertainment and Roleplaying (RP) purposes, and by no means is meant for intellectual or copyright infringement, or false identity, and is however used to appreciate said image, term or name by means of Roleplay.

User avatar
Leppikania
Minister
 
Posts: 2332
Founded: Apr 13, 2015
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Leppikania » Sat Mar 05, 2016 12:34 pm

SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: anddd_1457206318

Commend UsaUSAusa1

A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a nation or region.


Category: Commendation

Nominee: UsaUSAusa1

Proposed by: Anddd

Description: Description: RECOGNIZING the player of Usausausa1 as a fair leader of his or her region.

OBSERVING his or her tireless efforts to be fair and unbiased to all

VIEWING his or her characteristics as a former member of his or her region

OFFICALLY praises Usausausa1 and recognizes his or her achievements with a commendation from the World Assembly.

Approvals: 1 (Anddd)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 103 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 9 hours

R4 everywhere.
INTP, -4.25 Economic Left/Right, -4.1 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian, tastes like chicken.
I do use NS stats, thank you very much.
Funny Quotes
Pie charts for industries
Request an Embassy

User avatar
We Are Not the NSA
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1542
Founded: Nov 25, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby We Are Not the NSA » Sat Mar 05, 2016 12:35 pm

@#%#@%@#!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!

LEP!!!! Y U NINJA ME!?

Edit: :)

Edit 2: I actually questioned whether that was an R4 violation when I first read it, since it seems clear that the author was making an effort to not use "he" or "she", but then I realized that since both of those are R4c violations, and the phrase "he or she" means that one of those words is being applied, it is still a violation.
Last edited by We Are Not the NSA on Sat Mar 05, 2016 12:40 pm, edited 2 times in total.
\▼/We Are Not the NSA | Nohbdy | Eumaeus\▼/

Raiding HistorySecurity CouncilDear NativesTWP Raid

Retired Raider | He, Him, His | Bisexual

User avatar
We Are Not the NSA
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1542
Founded: Nov 25, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby We Are Not the NSA » Sun Mar 06, 2016 9:32 am

Condemn DEN

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.


Category: Condemnation

Nominee: DEN

Proposed by: The Iron Union

Description: As a whole, the security council has neglected the issue of raiders, with one particularly obnoxious group standing above the rest. DEN is a large region that routinely harasses and usurps control of smaller regions, depriving them of their freedoms to endorse their own delegate, promote their own officers, and choose how they're represented as a region.

Reasons:
-DEN as a region does nothing but sabotage other regions, no matter how peaceful or small

-Their belligerent practices deprive other nations of their political freedom within their region and in the World Assembly

-No action can be taken against them unless the Security Council condemns their region and their leaders

The security council routinely neglects requests to condemn DEN and its nations. For the sake of the World Assembly and all underlying nations and regions, please consider this proposal an icebreaker for delegates and WA members to speak out against DEN and their leaders

R3
\▼/We Are Not the NSA | Nohbdy | Eumaeus\▼/

Raiding HistorySecurity CouncilDear NativesTWP Raid

Retired Raider | He, Him, His | Bisexual

User avatar
Leppikania
Minister
 
Posts: 2332
Founded: Apr 13, 2015
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Leppikania » Sun Mar 06, 2016 5:16 pm

SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: phrike_1457308102

Condemn Sedgistan

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.


Category: Condemnation

Nominee: Sedgistan

Proposed by: Phrike

Description: Sedgistan has been abusing his power as a moderator and restricting the right to ask non offensive questions. First let's take a look at what we cannot post. According to the nationstates help page you cannot post anything of the following nature.
1. Obscene
2. Illegal
3. Threatening
4. Malicious
5. Defamatory
6. Spam

Now let's look at the topics that they've locked and see if they fit into either of these categories. I have included links to screenshots (sent to me by Almops) at the bottom as proof.

Topic Question: "My nation has made a lot of progress from the start but progression seems to have stopped, wavering in between a few ranks. How can I improve my civil rights, economy, and political freedom? Most especially my political freedom since it is my worst right now.
Sedgistan's response: You've posted on pretty much all your other nations asking for advice on improving your stats. At this point I am going to start locking anymore you post, and suggest you stick to one of your existing ones for further. Beyond that it's up to you to experiment with actually playing the game to work out how to achieve your goals."
Source: http://prnt.sc/ac3t69

Segistan was true to his word and locked the next topic Almops posted asking for help under one of his nations called Asininity.
Source: http://prnt.sc/ac3spn

Conclusion: Even if you think Almops should not ask for help with his stats that does not mean he broke a site rule and therefore should not have his topics locked.

Approvals: 1 (Vancouvia)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 102 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 4 hours

Breaks every rule of the Security Council.

EDIT: it also looks like they used multies to submit this. A GHR has been filed. I don't know how this proposal could get any more illegal.
Last edited by Leppikania on Sun Mar 06, 2016 5:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.
INTP, -4.25 Economic Left/Right, -4.1 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian, tastes like chicken.
I do use NS stats, thank you very much.
Funny Quotes
Pie charts for industries
Request an Embassy

User avatar
We Are Not the NSA
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1542
Founded: Nov 25, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby We Are Not the NSA » Sun Mar 06, 2016 5:56 pm

Leppikania wrote:
SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: phrike_1457308102

Condemn Sedgistan

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.


Category: Condemnation

Nominee: Sedgistan

Proposed by: Phrike

Description: Sedgistan has been abusing his power as a moderator and restricting the right to ask non offensive questions. First let's take a look at what we cannot post. According to the nationstates help page you cannot post anything of the following nature.
1. Obscene
2. Illegal
3. Threatening
4. Malicious
5. Defamatory
6. Spam

Now let's look at the topics that they've locked and see if they fit into either of these categories. I have included links to screenshots (sent to me by Almops) at the bottom as proof.

Topic Question: "My nation has made a lot of progress from the start but progression seems to have stopped, wavering in between a few ranks. How can I improve my civil rights, economy, and political freedom? Most especially my political freedom since it is my worst right now.
Sedgistan's response: You've posted on pretty much all your other nations asking for advice on improving your stats. At this point I am going to start locking anymore you post, and suggest you stick to one of your existing ones for further. Beyond that it's up to you to experiment with actually playing the game to work out how to achieve your goals."
Source: http://prnt.sc/ac3t69

Segistan was true to his word and locked the next topic Almops posted asking for help under one of his nations called Asininity.
Source: http://prnt.sc/ac3spn

Conclusion: Even if you think Almops should not ask for help with his stats that does not mean he broke a site rule and therefore should not have his topics locked.

Approvals: 1 (Vancouvia)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 102 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 4 hours

Breaks every rule of the Security Council.

EDIT: it also looks like they used multies to submit this. A GHR has been filed. I don't know how this proposal could get any more illegal.

Sedgistan has been abusing his power as a moderator


There is an R1, an R2 and an R4 violation all in the first 9 words of the resolution. Since an operative clause can technically be located anywhere in a proposal, I'm going to count the overarching R3 violation in those 9 words too. Therefore, the first 9 words of this proposal break every single rule in the Security Council, plus the non-NS link is also illegal (but not listed in the core rules of the SC).
\▼/We Are Not the NSA | Nohbdy | Eumaeus\▼/

Raiding HistorySecurity CouncilDear NativesTWP Raid

Retired Raider | He, Him, His | Bisexual

User avatar
Leppikania
Minister
 
Posts: 2332
Founded: Apr 13, 2015
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Leppikania » Sun Mar 06, 2016 6:28 pm

We Are Not the NSA wrote:
Leppikania wrote:
SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: phrike_1457308102

Condemn Sedgistan

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.


Category: Condemnation

Nominee: Sedgistan

Proposed by: Phrike

Description: Sedgistan has been abusing his power as a moderator and restricting the right to ask non offensive questions. First let's take a look at what we cannot post. According to the nationstates help page you cannot post anything of the following nature.
1. Obscene
2. Illegal
3. Threatening
4. Malicious
5. Defamatory
6. Spam

Now let's look at the topics that they've locked and see if they fit into either of these categories. I have included links to screenshots (sent to me by Almops) at the bottom as proof.

Topic Question: "My nation has made a lot of progress from the start but progression seems to have stopped, wavering in between a few ranks. How can I improve my civil rights, economy, and political freedom? Most especially my political freedom since it is my worst right now.
Sedgistan's response: You've posted on pretty much all your other nations asking for advice on improving your stats. At this point I am going to start locking anymore you post, and suggest you stick to one of your existing ones for further. Beyond that it's up to you to experiment with actually playing the game to work out how to achieve your goals."
Source: http://prnt.sc/ac3t69

Segistan was true to his word and locked the next topic Almops posted asking for help under one of his nations called Asininity.
Source: http://prnt.sc/ac3spn

Conclusion: Even if you think Almops should not ask for help with his stats that does not mean he broke a site rule and therefore should not have his topics locked.

Approvals: 1 (Vancouvia)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 102 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 4 hours

Breaks every rule of the Security Council.

EDIT: it also looks like they used multies to submit this. A GHR has been filed. I don't know how this proposal could get any more illegal.

Sedgistan has been abusing his power as a moderator


There is an R1, an R2 and an R4 violation all in the first 9 words of the resolution. Since an operative clause can technically be located anywhere in a proposal, I'm going to count the overarching R3 violation in those 9 words too. Therefore, the first 9 words of this proposal break every single rule in the Security Council, plus the non-NS link is also illegal (but not listed in the core rules of the SC).

It is? :eyebrow: how?
INTP, -4.25 Economic Left/Right, -4.1 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian, tastes like chicken.
I do use NS stats, thank you very much.
Funny Quotes
Pie charts for industries
Request an Embassy

User avatar
Wrapper
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6020
Founded: Antiquity
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wrapper » Sun Mar 06, 2016 6:35 pm

Leppikania wrote:
We Are Not the NSA wrote:
Sedgistan has been abusing his power as a moderator


There is an R1, an R2 and an R4 violation all in the first 9 words of the resolution. Since an operative clause can technically be located anywhere in a proposal, I'm going to count the overarching R3 violation in those 9 words too. Therefore, the first 9 words of this proposal break every single rule in the Security Council, plus the non-NS link is also illegal (but not listed in the core rules of the SC).

It is? :eyebrow: how?

Ardchoille wrote:TIP: Don’t use links in the text of your proposal. Successful proposals – resolutions – go into the permanent records of the World Assembly. But links die: the server shifts, posts gets deleted, whatever. The WA Librarian doesn’t like his records being messed up with dead links. Links in your proposal will make it illegal.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads