[Joke/Non-Pursuit] Condemn Winner12345

[SunRawr]

I understand that he is annoying and you guys really want him to go away, but it isn't worth giving him his own personal page in the history of NS. Especially because he likely won't even be playing the game for very long. Even if this did happen to pass, which is doubtful, it probably wouldn't change his behavior in the slightest. It would likely give him credibility with newer players who see that he has a badge, and think that he is therefor well known and acknowledged by the rest of NS.

[The Republic of Lanos]

Where do I sign?

[Great Kingdom of Calomo]

We had problems with proposals 2 days ago, and now we understand, for example, that this proposal has no-sense.

[Individuality-ness]

While our WA Delegation has seen these allegations and can verify that the delegation from Winner12345 has been rather stubborn and slightly naive (if not deluded) through its attempts to pass undesirable gun legislation and the like, we see no reason to give him a permanent spot in the WA history books by formal condemnation.

We also feel that it would be simpler for most nations to just declare the delegation from Winner12345 persona non grata, and furthermore, not recognize the nation's existence at all.

Allie Youngblood,
WA Ambassador from Individuality-ness

(OOC: Formalities aside, it would be easier to just ignore him and his rather numerous threads... )

[Frisbeeteria]

My guess is that if he continues with his present behavior, people will figure out fairly quickly not to have anything to do with him.

Historically inaccurate, I'm afraid. The worse the player, the more avid the responses. Some do it out of conviction that "he can be shown the error of his ways", others out of some idea that anti-trolling prevents trolling ... but most keep such threads going for the lulz. Sadly, such targets are rarely aware that they're lulz-worthy, and think that they garner all the attention because they're popular with the player base.

As a player, I would advise the OP to not pursue this proposal. There's no positive outcome to be had.

[Bergnovinaia]

My guess is that if he continues with his present behavior, people will figure out fairly quickly not to have anything to do with him.

Historically inaccurate, I'm afraid. The worse the player, the more avid the responses. Some do it out of conviction that "he can be shown the error of his ways", others out of some idea that anti-trolling prevents trolling ... but most keep such threads going for the lulz. Sadly, such targets are rarely aware that they're lulz-worthy, and think that they garner all the attention because they're popular with the player base.

As a player, I would advise the OP to not pursue this proposal. There's no positive outcome to be had.

Ok. Changing title now.

[Vanhania]

I'm for it XD

[The Iron Moon]

But if one obnoxious nation gets a fancy condemnation badge for making stupid proposals they will all want one!

[Vanhania]

true XD

[Of the Free Socialist Territories]

Here's an alternative.

Commend Winner12345

A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a nation or region.

Category: Commendation | Nominee: Winner12345 | Proposed by: of The Free Socialist Territories

Description: The Security Council of the World Assembly:

RECOGNISING that some nations' ambassadors are often vexed by the nature of the contributions from the ambassador of Winner12345;

HIGHLIGHTING that these ambassadors take issue with the ambassador from Winner12345's frequent resubmission of unwelcome proposals, the ungrammatical nature of these proposals, the seeming lack of thought behind them and the ambassador's violation of his deal never to return to the WA if his gun control proposal did not reach quorum, which it did not;

NONETHELESS RECOGNISES WITH A SLIGHT SENSE OF FOREBODING that the ambassador of Winner12345, henceforth to be known as "The Ambassador", has shown a great deal of tenacity in his senseless attempt to pass unpopular gun control legislation from both sides of the debate;

UNDERSTANDING that some ambassadors are not vexed by The Ambassador's frequent attempts at passing legislation, but instead view the material as comic relief from the normally stressful and unpleasant SC business of dealing with countless genocides and crimes against humanity;

REALISING that while this behaviour has done much to raise the blood pressure of some ambassadors, it has also done much to relax some ambassadors and has, according to some accounts, saved the marriage of the ambassador of The Free Socialist Territories;

Hereby commends the nation of Winner12345, for bringing a little light to the Security Council's normally morbid and morose meetings.

[The Great Destruction]

This does not need to be a joke. I'd suppport this proposal. It is as legitimate as any other I've seen. If the nation of Winner12345 does not comport themselves in a way respectible to other nations in the WA, triues to cheat the system for it own benifit and is regularly abusive to other nations I say CONDEMN

[Individuality-ness]

Here's an alternative.

(Image)
Commend Winner12345

A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a nation or region.

Category: Commendation | Nominee: Winner12345 | Proposed by: of The Free Socialist Territories

Description: The Security Council of the World Assembly:

RECOGNISING that some nations' ambassadors are often vexed by the nature of the contributions from the ambassador of Winner12345;

HIGHLIGHTING that these ambassadors take issue with the ambassador from Winner12345's frequent resubmission of unwelcome proposals, then ungrammatical nature of these proposals, the seeming lack of thought behind them and the ambassador's violation of his deal never to return to the WA if his gun control proposal did not reach quorum, which it did not;

NONETHELESS RECOGNISES WITH A SLIGHT SENSE OF FOREBODING that the ambassador of Winner12345, henceforth to be known as "The Ambassador", has shown a great deal of tenacity in his senseless attempt to pass unpopular gun control legislation from both sides of the debate;

UNDERSTANDING that some ambassadors are not vexed by The Ambassador's frequent attempts at passing legislation, but instead view the material as comic relief from the normally stressful and unpleasant SC business of dealing with countless genocides and crimes against humanity;

REALISING that while this behaviour has done much to raise the blood pressure of some ambassadors, it has also done much to relax some ambassadors and has, according to some accounts, saved the marriage of the ambassador of The Free Socialist Territories;

Hereby commends the nation of Winner12345, for bringing a little light to the Security Council's normally morbid and morose meetings.

Um, ambassador...

HIGHLIGHTING that these ambassadors take issue with the ambassador from Winner12345's frequent resubmission of unwelcome proposals, then ungrammatical nature of these proposals, the seeming lack of thought behind them and the ambassador's violation of his deal never to return to the WA if his gun control proposal did not reach quorum, which it did not;

should be this:

HIGHLIGHTING that these ambassadors take issue with the ambassador from Winner12345's frequent resubmission of unwelcome proposals, the ungrammatical nature of these proposals, the seeming lack of thought behind them and the ambassador's violation of his deal never to return to the WA if his gun control proposal did not reach quorum, which it did not;

Otherwise, this cracked me up, something you don't see everyday within these rather formal chambers. Good work.

Allie Youngblood

[Of the Free Socialist Territories]

HIGHLIGHTING that these ambassadors take issue with the ambassador from Winner12345's frequent resubmission of unwelcome proposals, then ungrammatical nature of these proposals, the seeming lack of thought behind them and the ambassador's violation of his deal never to return to the WA if his gun control proposal did not reach quorum, which it did not;

I find it ironic that my only typo in the whole thing was in the clause specifically about grammar, but thanks for pointing it out.

- Carlos Ibaurri
TSFT Ambassador

[Individuality-ness]

HIGHLIGHTING that these ambassadors take issue with the ambassador from Winner12345's frequent resubmission of unwelcome proposals, then ungrammatical nature of these proposals, the seeming lack of thought behind them and the ambassador's violation of his deal never to return to the WA if his gun control proposal did not reach quorum, which it did not;

I find it ironic that my only typo in the whole thing was in the clause specifically about grammar, but thanks for pointing it out.

- Carlos Ibaurri
TSFT Ambassador

It's like education proposals; it's traditional to have at least one spelling/grammatical error in said proposals.

Allie Youngblood

[Is it really]

FOR ALL THE WAY I would vote for it. (And i am sure it would recieve a 95% yes 5 no vote, Largest margin ever)

[Winner12345]

FOR ALL THE WAY I would vote for it. (And i am sure it would recieve a 95% yes 5 no vote, Largest margin ever)

I Would have to agree

[Winner12345]

And a question, Can you put yourself up for Condemnation? Cause if you let me, once i get enough endorsements, i would submit this.

[Of the Free Socialist Territories]

And a question, Can you put yourself up for Condemnation? Cause if you let me, once i get enough endorsements, i would submit this.

You can submit yourself for condemnation, but it's considered 'uncool' and everyone who sees it would cringe with embarrassment.

The fact that Winner12345 wants it, ladies and gentlemen, and that he considers it cool, proves beyond doubt that it can't be allowed to happen.

[Winner12345]

And a question, Can you put yourself up for Condemnation? Cause if you let me, once i get enough endorsements, i would submit this.

You can submit yourself for condemnation, but it's considered 'uncool' and everyone who sees it would cringe with embarrassment.

The fact that Winner12345 wants it, ladies and gentlemen, and that he considers it cool, proves beyond doubt that it can't be allowed to happen.

Come on . I honestly do like it though. FOr the most part well written, very convincing(Although some is twisting the truth a little bit), I think it would pass.

[Of the Free Socialist Territories]

You can submit yourself for condemnation, but it's considered 'uncool' and everyone who sees it would cringe with embarrassment.

The fact that Winner12345 wants it, ladies and gentlemen, and that he considers it cool, proves beyond doubt that it can't be allowed to happen.

Come on . I honestly do like it though. FOr the most part well written, very convincing(Although some is twisting the truth a little bit), I think it would pass.

But if you put that proposal to the SC, it'd be plagiarism, as it isn't a proposal you wrote. You'd need to write your own proposal explaining why you ought to be condemned first.

[Winner12345]

Come on . I honestly do like it though. FOr the most part well written, very convincing(Although some is twisting the truth a little bit), I think it would pass.

But if you put that proposal to the SC, it'd be plagiarism, as it isn't a proposal you wrote. You'd need to write your own proposal explaining why you ought to be condemned first.

Not if Bergnovinia says that i can submit it. If he does though i want to be a Co-writer.

[Of the Free Socialist Territories]

But if you put that proposal to the SC, it'd be plagiarism, as it isn't a proposal you wrote. You'd need to write your own proposal explaining why you ought to be condemned first.

Not if Bergnovinia says that i can submit it. If he does though i want to be a Co-writer.

Historically inaccurate, I'm afraid. The worse the player, the more avid the responses. Some do it out of conviction that "he can be shown the error of his ways", others out of some idea that anti-trolling prevents trolling ... but most keep such threads going for the lulz. Sadly, such targets are rarely aware that they're lulz-worthy, and think that they garner all the attention because they're popular with the player base.

As a player, I would advise the OP to not pursue this proposal. There's no positive outcome to be had.

Ok. Changing title now.

Bergovinia isn't going to want to submit it, or let you submit it, I'd say.

[Winner12345]

Not if Bergnovinia says that i can submit it. If he does though i want to be a Co-writer.

Ok. Changing title now.

Bergovinia isn't going to want to submit it, or let you submit it, I'd say.

No i really think he does want me to be condemned one way the other

[Of the Free Socialist Territories]

Bergovinia isn't going to want to submit it, or let you submit it, I'd say.

No i really think he does want me to be condemned one way the other

He did, but then Fris advised him that it wouldn't change you or be of any benefit, and now he doesn't want to condemn you. I read this thread. Either you haven't, or you're delusional about the desire of OP to condemn you.

"NON-PURSUIT" in the title is a pretty handy clue.

[Winner12345]

No i really think he does want me to be condemned one way the other

He did, but then Fris advised him that it wouldn't change you or be of any benefit, and now he doesn't want to condemn you. I read this thread. Either you haven't, or you're delusional about the desire of OP to condemn you.

"NON-PURSUIT" in the title is a pretty handy clue.

So i could probably ask him to if i could take the bill over, which i will ask him.