Inflatable Gandalfs wrote:Finally, why should the natives of a region have to appeal to the WA for permission to impose password protection again? Why can't the "Liberation" effect simply expire after a few months and render the question of repeal moot? Seems to me a far more efficient regime than voting 2+ times on the same region's predicament.
I agree with the aspect that there has to be a better method of executing a liberation from the standpoint of the Security Council. However, it's not relevant to the current resolution. Which, as I stated previously, is a pretty straight forward thing. Liberations and their repeals are utilitarian in nature. As long as the natives get back the ability to protect their region, the wording is just gravy. It's just that since native leader is actively involved in the debate, we should defer to him to present the proposal.
The Build-A-Better-