RECALLING the events which led to The NationStates Community to succeed in its original goals;
NOTING that The Nationstates Community does not represent the NationStates Community as a whole;
REJECTING that said nation being managed in a manner of 'one member nation, one vote' and relying only on those nations that choose to vote is "Democratic"; if it represented the entire NationStates Community, it should have allowed all nations to vote. Due to lack of warning and time given to other nations, it cannot be considered to have succeeded in fairly representing the entire NationStates Community.
FURTHER REJECTING that it was Democratic to gain control of most of the shares and gain a majority share, thus taking control away from the other nations that did not participate in this plan; that others who refused to participate were ignored in this process;
NOTING WITH REGRET that a handful of those that participated in The Nationstates Community's rise to prominence attacked other groups that did not share in their goal;
CONCLUDING that, in fact, The Nationstates Community is poorly named and exists to concentrate shares in the hands of a few rather than allowing the many nations of Nationstates to share their power over shares;
REPEALS "Commend The NationStates Community."
Updated to answer questions Ballotonia had. Will submit if it has no more major errors/rule violations.