NATION

PASSWORD

CONDEMN The Central Pacific [Rough Draft]

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.
User avatar
Blluedevil
Secretary
 
Posts: 28
Founded: Sep 02, 2005
Ex-Nation

CONDEMN The Central Pacific [Rough Draft]

Postby Blluedevil » Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:06 am

The The Empire of Blluedevil today condemneds the apparent ludacris ways of naming regions so closely similiar to starter regions.

The official statement read in part:

"The Empire of Blluedevil utterly condemn what are apparently misleading acts of terrorism against innocent new nations. We join with all Nation States in calling for the swift apprehension and punishment of the perpetrators. No political cause could ever be assisted by such immoral acts."

Leaders of the The Empire of Blluedevil held a meeting in Black Star City, on Wednesday September 16, 2009, to issue the following points related to the shady name region:

1) We assert unequivocal condemnation based on our political values and our identity as an established world power;

2) We do not need to defend every maniacal incident emanating from the region world or the region community, just as other region groups need not defend their names;

3) We offer compassion to the new nations and solidarity with all Nation-States in the face of danger;

4) Notwithstanding the disbelief that anyone creating a region of nations could commit such a misleading crime, we condemn the act regardless of the identity of the perpetrators;

5) We deplore the irresponsible reporting that twists the realities and complexities of the region world in order to project only anti-factual sentiment during this disturbing period when we are all attempting to move beyond the state of creation;

6) We warn against opportunists who will exploit the misleading and deception of the public in order to promote a political agenda aimed at tarnishing the name of The World regions and starter regions;

7) We should not diminish our resolve to be active in protecting the civil liberties of all Nation States and struggling for justice both locally and globally;

8.) We need to organize activities to help the victims psychologically and in every other way we can;

9) In order to do this, the resolution calls for only Pacific named regions be permitted for the use as starter regions (ex. The Central Pacific and The Northwest Pacific)
Last edited by Blluedevil on Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Bears Armed
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21479
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:15 am

1. This should be in the 'Security Council', not the 'General Assembly'.

2. A 'Condemnation' can only "Condemn", and place a label to that effect on the main page for the region (or nation) concerned, it can't lay down any rule such as the one that you suggest here.
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Population = just under 20 million. Economy = only Thriving. Average Life expectancy = c.60 years. If the nation is classified as 'Anarchy' there still is a [strictly limited] national government... and those aren't "biker gangs", they're traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies', generally respected rather than feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474, 1521.

User avatar
Omigodtheykilledkenny
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5744
Founded: Mar 14, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Omigodtheykilledkenny » Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:28 am

Besides, everyone knows that when players try to "impersonate" regions, you're supposed to cry to the mods, and they'll shut down the doppelganger regions for you! They might even do something about the infamous Christopher Bridges, who is apparently in on this plot to defame the Feeders. 8)
Omigodtheykilledkenny FAQ | "The Biggest Sovereigntist IN THE WORLD" - Chester Pearson

User avatar
The Emmerian Unions
Minister
 
Posts: 2407
Founded: Jan 02, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emmerian Unions » Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:28 pm

Blluedevil wrote:9) In order to do this, the resolution calls for only Pacific named regions be permitted for the use as starter regions (ex. The Central Pacific and The Northwest Pacific)


Can't happen dude.
The Cake is a lie!
<<Peace through Fear and Superior Firepower>>

STOP AMERICAN IMPERIALISM? America is ANTI-IMPERIAL!
Ifreann wrote:"And in world news, the United States has recently elected Bill Gates as God Emperor For All Time. Foreign commentators believe that Gates' personal fortune may have played a role in his victory, but criticism from the United States of Gates(as it is now known) has been sparse and brief."
For good Russian Rock Radio, go here.
Please note, I rarely go into NSG. If I post there, please do not expect a response from me.
ALL HAIL THE GODDESS REPLOID PRODUCTIONS!

User avatar
Kandarin
Diplomat
 
Posts: 869
Founded: Antiquity
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kandarin » Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:33 pm

The wording of this doesn't make much sense ICly or OOCly. In any case, user regions using Pacific-y names has been done pretty much from the start and this is the first I've heard of anyone seriously disapproving of it.
I wish I remember who wrote:Games like Nationstates are like a big cardboard box, and there are two kinds of people in the world. The kind who look at the empty void inside the box and ask "Where the hell is it?" and the kind who jump into the box with their friends and make it into a fort, or a spaceship.

User avatar
Blluedevil
Secretary
 
Posts: 28
Founded: Sep 02, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Blluedevil » Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:00 pm

Ok, thank you Kandarin, I'll clean up the language and as for contacting a moderator - I'll see what they can do. On second thought, I do not know where you are finding this wrongly written wording at?
Last edited by Blluedevil on Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Blluedevil
Secretary
 
Posts: 28
Founded: Sep 02, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Blluedevil » Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:02 pm

Bears Armed wrote:2. A 'Condemnation' can only "Condemn", and place a label to that effect on the main page for the region (or nation) concerned, it can't lay down any rule such as the one that you suggest here.



Ok, so I imagine I should delete number 9.

User avatar
Gobbannium
Envoy
 
Posts: 332
Founded: Jan 10, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Gobbannium » Wed Sep 16, 2009 5:43 pm

May we ask if the text of the official statement is word-for-word the intended Condemnation proposal? We find the repeated reference to the Empire of Blluedevil and locations therein distracting and unbecoming to a formal proposal, intending no offence to the empire itself. We are uncertain of the conventions surrounding the submissions to the Security Council, but the General Assembly would regard such references as "branding" and consider them cause for striking a proposal from the list of those submitted with great vigour. It is particularly a cause for concern since it seems to imply that only the Empire is condemning the Central Pacific region, rather than the whole World Assembly.
Prince Rhodri of Segontium, Master of the Red Hounds, etc, etc.
Ambassador to the World Assembly of the Principalities of Gobbannium

User avatar
Charlotte Ryberg
The Muse of the Westcountry
 
Posts: 15007
Founded: Mar 14, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Charlotte Ryberg » Thu Sep 17, 2009 10:13 am

I believe the The Central Pacific has a clear disclaimer that it is not a feeder region, so therefore I cannot see a reason for the condemnation, honoured ambassador to Blluedevil.

User avatar
Firstaria
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8409
Founded: Jun 29, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Firstaria » Sat Sep 19, 2009 4:08 am

The OVERLORD of Firstaria is aganist this condemnation. The only good reason seems to be the name, and for us that isn't a good reason.
OVERLORD Daniel Mercury of Firstaria
Original Author of SC #5 and SC #30

User avatar
Blluedevil
Secretary
 
Posts: 28
Founded: Sep 02, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Blluedevil » Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:48 am

Charlotte Ryberg wrote:I believe the The Central Pacific has a clear disclaimer that it is not a feeder region, so therefore I cannot see a reason for the condemnation, honoured ambassador to Blluedevil.



It's a clear disclaimer, yes, but nontheless people still recruit in that region.

User avatar
Sedgistan
Site Director
 
Posts: 35473
Founded: Oct 20, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Sedgistan » Thu Sep 24, 2009 11:00 am

And that is their fault, how?

User avatar
Blluedevil
Secretary
 
Posts: 28
Founded: Sep 02, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Blluedevil » Fri Sep 25, 2009 12:52 pm

Why knowlingly name a region so similar to that of a starter region?

User avatar
Krioval
Minister
 
Posts: 2458
Founded: Jan 24, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Krioval » Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:19 pm

Blluedevil wrote:Why knowlingly name a region so similar to that of a starter region?


Why not name a region what you like, especially if one is taking care to distinguish oneself as not being a different region? I mean, they're not impersonating any other region, and they're taking pains to label themselves as not a feeder region.

User avatar
Sedgistan
Site Director
 
Posts: 35473
Founded: Oct 20, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Sedgistan » Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:22 pm

I'm an active member of the region North Pacific, and we constantly get spam from people who think we're The North Pacific. Really, its not too hard to check, and the game regions are listed somewhere in the FAQ. OK, this is a bit different, as its got a massive population, but I think the region is just being used to sort nations, possibly as part of an experiment with issues. Putting them all in The Central Pacific isn't annoying - I think its actually quite funny.

User avatar
Blluedevil
Secretary
 
Posts: 28
Founded: Sep 02, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Blluedevil » Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:02 pm

Actually I accidentially recruited in North Pacific today by mistake because I did not catch the "The" in The North Pacific.

I do not feel that it's right that nations name regions so closely to that of feeder regions. It generates confusion.

User avatar
Centrax
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 4
Founded: Nov 16, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Centrax » Mon Sep 28, 2009 6:31 pm

The Central Pacific didn't bother me as much as the other feeder "impostors". Even someone familiar with the feeders could easily mistake "North Pacific" with "THE North Pacific". Also, it looks like The Central Pacific has mostly disbanded; it's dropped from 700+ down to 6.

User avatar
Sedgistan
Site Director
 
Posts: 35473
Founded: Oct 20, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Sedgistan » Mon Sep 28, 2009 7:13 pm

North Pacific has been around for years. Its really not that hard to remember that its The North Pacific (the one with loads of nations) which is the feeder, or that The Central Pacific (only appeared a couple of weeks ago) isn't actually a feeder. All you need to do is think a bit.
Last edited by Sedgistan on Mon Sep 28, 2009 7:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Danielturner
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 133
Founded: Aug 27, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Danielturner » Sun Oct 04, 2009 10:29 pm

This statue will not hold together in my book.

User avatar
Rhythm4U
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Sep 29, 2009
Ex-Nation

Condemn The Central Pacific

Postby Rhythm4U » Sun Oct 04, 2009 10:36 pm

Hello I believe as a member of the World Assembly I am entitled to say that if you would like to submit a proposal so extreme, then you would have to submit it to the Security Council not our General Assembly in order to even have a chance at receiving the correct measures that should be taken.

Deligate from Rhythm4u


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ashlinla

Advertisement

Remove ads