by Balaerica » Sat Dec 03, 2011 11:36 pm
by Paper Flowers » Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:52 am
by Crushing Our Enemies » Sun Dec 04, 2011 10:21 am
Balaerica wrote:That is that the WA is totally ignoring the internal affairs of various nations. All current security council resolutions are related to raiding, account jacking, and forum destruction; external crimes.
by Skyrim Diplomacy » Sun Dec 04, 2011 1:13 pm
Balaerica wrote:Shouldn't the Security Council also step in to put a stop to human rights abuse?
by Cinistra » Mon Dec 05, 2011 12:12 am
Balaerica wrote:I have noticed a disturbing trend in the world assembly; and it ought to be the security council's responsibility to take care of it.
That is that the WA is totally ignoring the internal affairs of various nations. All current security council resolutions are related to raiding, account jacking, and forum destruction; external crimes.
Shouldn't the Security Council also step in to put a stop to human rights abuse? There are some nations that have gained a tremendous amount of prestige in the international community over their WA activity, yet who enact extremely abusive policies against their citizens.
Am I the only one who thinks that's wrong?
by Dizyntk » Mon Dec 05, 2011 12:30 am
by Balaerica » Mon Dec 05, 2011 12:27 pm
by Skyrim Diplomacy » Mon Dec 05, 2011 1:33 pm
Balaerica wrote:I am not speakIng about non-members, but WA members should have to meet certain standards within a certain amount of time. The UN was created with the goal of preventing holocausts, an internal event. Shouldn't the WA follow a similar pattern of core values?
I'm just testing the waters here to get opinions. Maybe delegates at the least ought to meet certain standards?
by Metania » Mon Dec 05, 2011 2:37 pm
Balaerica wrote:I am not speakIng about non-members, but WA members should have to meet certain standards within a certain amount of time. The UN was created with the goal of preventing holocausts, an internal event. Shouldn't the WA follow a similar pattern of core values?
I'm just testing the waters here to get opinions. Maybe delegates at the least ought to meet certain standards?
by Tim-Opolis » Mon Dec 05, 2011 7:02 pm
Balaerica wrote:I have noticed a disturbing trend in the world assembly; and it ought to be the security council's responsibility to take care of it.
That is that the WA is totally ignoring the internal affairs of various nations. All current security council resolutions are related to raiding, account jacking, and forum destruction; external crimes.
Shouldn't the Security Council also step in to put a stop to human rights abuse? There are some nations that have gained a tremendous amount of prestige in the international community over their WA activity, yet who enact extremely abusive policies against their citizens.
Am I the only one who thinks that's wrong?
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic
by The Greater Aryan Race » Tue Dec 06, 2011 1:18 am
Imperium Sidhicum wrote:So, uh... Is this another one of those threads where everyone is supposed to feel outraged and circle-jerk in agreement of how injust and terrible the described incident is?
Because if it is, I'm probably going to say something mean and contrary just to contradict the majority.
by Cinistra » Tue Dec 06, 2011 2:38 am
The Greater Aryan Race wrote:So what? You're going to condemn EVERY Fascist and Communist and evil Totalitarian Dictatorship nation?
by The Greater Aryan Race » Tue Dec 06, 2011 2:42 am
Imperium Sidhicum wrote:So, uh... Is this another one of those threads where everyone is supposed to feel outraged and circle-jerk in agreement of how injust and terrible the described incident is?
Because if it is, I'm probably going to say something mean and contrary just to contradict the majority.
by Sleepyyawn » Tue Dec 06, 2011 2:48 am
by The Greater Aryan Race » Tue Dec 06, 2011 2:51 am
Imperium Sidhicum wrote:So, uh... Is this another one of those threads where everyone is supposed to feel outraged and circle-jerk in agreement of how injust and terrible the described incident is?
Because if it is, I'm probably going to say something mean and contrary just to contradict the majority.
by Crushing Our Enemies » Wed Dec 07, 2011 2:44 pm
Sleepyyawn wrote:I don't think so. The WA doesn't have power over people outside of their memberbase, I believe.
by Crushing Our Enemies » Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:13 pm
Yammata wrote:It is my own business how I treat my Citizens.
by Matts Empire » Wed Dec 07, 2011 7:32 pm
by Crushing Our Enemies » Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:20 pm
Matts Empire wrote:Well I think that you do have a point however, what about people who are not WA members? The resolution will only stop WA members but people who are not its not going to stop them. Besides Its the way of history so there isn't anything we can do about it.
by Halastan » Mon Dec 12, 2011 4:18 pm
by Tim-Opolis » Mon Dec 12, 2011 4:19 pm
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic
by Canadaiana » Mon Dec 19, 2011 10:49 pm
Dizyntk wrote:"You mean to tell me that you think the SC actually does anything? Well, anything that really matters to anyone outside the SC?"
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement