Punk Reloaded wrote:A phrase containing 'hell' and 'freezes over' comes to mind when I think of commending Unibot.
Nay.
But... "I'll freeze over when Hell commends Unibot" doesn't make any sense!
Oh, and I'm for this, by the way.
Advertisement
by Astro-Malsitari WA Seat » Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:09 pm
Punk Reloaded wrote:A phrase containing 'hell' and 'freezes over' comes to mind when I think of commending Unibot.
Nay.
by The Bruce » Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:36 pm
by -St George » Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:40 pm
The Bruce wrote:I would say that Unibot has brought a lot of energy to NationStates and been one of its most active participants in the field of diplomacy over the last couple of years. They’re one of the most prolific resolution writers in the WA. In the last couple of years they have accomplished a great deal within the defender organizations they were a part of or founded, and had a lot to do with the direction of those organizations.
They’ve also been a very controversial figure, hence Unibot II. Being as active and enthusiastic as they’ve been, sometimes a bit too enthusiastic, they’ve occasionally rubbed people the wrong way or perhaps woken them from the sleepy NationStates existence they were peacefully enjoying. They’ve at times had that well-meaning enthusiasm derailed by bad decisions or by the treachery of those not so well-meaning, but for some reason they just keep coming back for more. For that alone they should be commended.
by Warzone Codger » Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:44 pm
Regardless of your feelings about Unibot's role in the NatSov-IntFedRaider-Defendersoap opera, Unibot should be commended for his contribution to DefendingWorld Assembly, and for his threads on Nationstates Generations and the Ideologies of Nations.
by -St George » Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:48 pm
Warzone Codger wrote:Don't you meanRegardless of your feelings about Unibot's role in the NatSov-IntFedRaider-Defendersoap opera, Unibot should be commended for his contribution to DefendingWorld Assembly, and for his threads on Nationstates Generations and the Ideologies of Nations.
In the other hand, I don't like "Regardless" argument since it tends to get OOC. We are supposed to be evaluating the Unibot nation from the perspective of our own nation.
by Tim-Opolis » Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:15 am
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic
by A mean old man » Wed Oct 12, 2011 1:14 pm
by Tim-Opolis » Wed Oct 12, 2011 1:43 pm
A mean old man wrote:It failed to attain quorum.
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic
by Drop Your Pants » Wed Oct 12, 2011 2:49 pm
by Belschaft » Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:15 pm
Drop Your Pants wrote:He's just annoyed too many people
by -St George » Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:32 pm
Drop Your Pants wrote:He's just annoyed too many people
by Belschaft » Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:34 am
by Tim-Opolis » Thu Oct 13, 2011 3:07 pm
Belschaft wrote:Anyway;
This will be resubmitted fairly soon, but not until;
1) I have time to run the TG campaign myself, instead of having to leave it to underlings
2) I have a GA proposoal I'm working on finished, so I can send one campaign TG out for both of them
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic
by The Republic of Lanos » Thu Oct 13, 2011 3:41 pm
by Mahaj » Thu Oct 13, 2011 3:52 pm
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Shoud we commend the damned Kennyites first? They've (no offense) contributed more than Unibot.
<Koth> I'm still going by the assumption that Mahaj is Unibot's kid brother or something
Kandarin(Naivetry): You're going to have a great NS career ahead of you if you want it, Mahaj. :)
<@Eluvatar> Why is SkyDip such a purist raiderist
<+frattastan> Because his region was never raided.
<+maxbarry> EarthAway: I guess I might dabble in raiding just to experience it better, but I would not like to raid regions of natives, so I'd probably be more interested in defense and liberations
by Celestial Sphere » Thu Oct 13, 2011 3:57 pm
by A mean old man » Thu Oct 13, 2011 4:05 pm
by New Bazlantis » Fri Oct 14, 2011 7:18 pm
by Drop Your Pants » Sat Oct 15, 2011 4:57 am
Whether you personally agree with Unibot's politics or his actions as a defender is irrelevant.
by Bears Armed » Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:24 am
Sedgistan wrote:Belschaft wrote:RECOGNIZING that sinceits founding inMay 2008the nation ofUnibot has established itself as a leader in numerous fields of activity, primarily WA authorship and defending
I'd suggest removing the struck-through bits. At the moment, it's too clear a reference to the ex-nation Unibot, which this proposal technically isn't commending.
by Bears Armed » Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:36 am
by Sedgistan » Mon Oct 17, 2011 8:41 am
by Bears Armed » Mon Oct 17, 2011 8:45 am
Sedgistan wrote:The proposal reads as if written by a nation, about a nation. When commending/condemning, authors can hold the nominee's main nation responsible for the actions of their puppet nations - it's nothing new.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement