Does SC Resolution #21 break Rule 4? (DRAFT?)
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2011 6:15 pmNOTE: This is just a question, not much of a statement, and I personally have nothing against Imagey Nation. I am a fan of their work, in fact.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=WA_past_resolutions/council=2/start=20
Security Council Resolution #21 is entitled 'Commend Imagey Nation'. It was passed on Tuesday, March 30th, 2010. It is a sound article, and this is the full document:
I am concerned it breaks Rule 4 because:
-It refers to Imagey Nation as a 'he', which is mentioning the real life player, which breaks Rule 4a and possibly Rule 4d.
-It mentions NationStates as a game, breaking Rule 4b.
-It also mentions Imagey Nation's popular thread several times, possibly breaking Rule 4b.
This is Rule 4:
If my arguments against this article are sound enough, I would like to make a draft on this subject. What are your thoughts?
http://www.nationstates.net/page=WA_past_resolutions/council=2/start=20
Security Council Resolution #21 is entitled 'Commend Imagey Nation'. It was passed on Tuesday, March 30th, 2010. It is a sound article, and this is the full document:
Description: THE WORLD ASSEMBLY:
NOTING that, to date, the Free Land of Imagey Nation's extremely successful thread, If you want a seal or logo, has received over 30 000 views and 1 000 responses, to which Imagey Nation has replied quickly, politely, and professionally regarding the creation of nation-specific images;
AWESTRICKEN by the meticulous care, precision, attention to detail, and overall creative genius Imagey Nation puts into his work and also by, not only the artistic and realistic value but the originality of the work,
FURTHER NOTING that Imagey Nation's image thread has been arguably the most successful thread of its kind on NationStates, and without it, images used for role-playing would be both few in number and poor in quality;
ACKNOWLEDGING that these seals, logos, communiqué templates, flags, and other related illustrations produced by Imagey Nation have almost always been received with positive feedback and responses of great thanks, and are still used significantly by the nations that Imagey Nation has been commissioned by;
FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGING that despite being busy, Imagey Nation has had a history of commitment to his thread, and of creating images for the nations that commission him quickly and diligently, and is always willing to further amend his work to suit the ever-changing demands of his patrons, whom he does not charge;
The World Assembly hereby officially presents The Free Land of Imagey Nation with a World Assembly Commendation for outstanding artistic contributions to the international community of NationStates.
I am concerned it breaks Rule 4 because:
-It refers to Imagey Nation as a 'he', which is mentioning the real life player, which breaks Rule 4a and possibly Rule 4d.
-It mentions NationStates as a game, breaking Rule 4b.
-It also mentions Imagey Nation's popular thread several times, possibly breaking Rule 4b.
This is Rule 4:
4. Your proposal must be able to be read as being submitted by a Nation, and as targeting a Nation or Region, and therefore must use nation-simulation language (“SC IC”).
For example, you proposal cannot:
(a) Refer directly to a player, rather than to the NationStates nation itself.
(b) Refer to the game, or events or actions in it, as a game or part of a game.
(c) Read as if you're speaking for you-the-player (eg, "I think", "I feel", "I believe". Try "my nation feels", "my government believes", etc.)
(d) Reference the real world, in the sense of the place that is not the NationStates community.
(e) Contain reference to ideologies without explaining how they apply to NationStates in terms of actions, policies or attributes of nations/regions.
If my arguments against this article are sound enough, I would like to make a draft on this subject. What are your thoughts?
