Commend The Black Hawks

by **Mahaj WA Seat** » Sat Mar 19, 2011 5:29 pm

by **Sedgistan** » Sat Mar 19, 2011 5:34 pm

Presumably, Soaring Tikal agreed to you doing that?

by **Mahaj WA Seat** » Sat Mar 19, 2011 5:40 pm

Sedgistan wrote:Presumably, Soaring Tikal agreed to you doing that?

Yes...Soaring Tikal and I had some discussion about this and he agreed.

And of course if at anytime he backs out of it, i'll simply file a GHR.

by **La La Lander** » Sun Mar 20, 2011 5:30 am

I did agree, and I'm a she

by **Horak** » Sun Mar 20, 2011 7:16 am

*Horak waddles up to the podium*

The Black Hawks are very evil and very mean.
Do not vote to commend them, thank you very much.

*Horak flies away*

by **Advancement of Man** » Sun Mar 20, 2011 7:17 am

Commend? don't we usually condemn raiding?
In fact, my region was just recently raided by these people, very stupidly, might i add, as i, the founder, was still active.

by **Jasarite** » Sun Mar 20, 2011 7:56 am

If this were condemning the Black Hawks you'd have my support. Raiding is something that must never be commended.

by **TheThanksgiving Turkey** » Sun Mar 20, 2011 8:24 am

Advancement of Man wrote:Commend? don't we usually condemn raiding?
In fact, my region was just recently raided by these people, very stupidly, might i add, as i, the founder, was still active.

What's more, TBH is also seeking a a condemnation. I think their point is either to be farcical -- or deliberately spite the Security Council. Both proposals should be rejected. They don't need no stinkin' badges.

by **Johz** » Sun Mar 20, 2011 8:36 am

I would vote yes for this, if it reached quorum. TBH do deserve recognition, and if it comes in the form of a Commendation, so be it. And if this is unwanted, they could be condemned as well. Which would be an event.

by **Democratic Koyro** » Sun Mar 20, 2011 10:47 am

venomously against these imperialist pigs.

would support condemnation though, unfortunatly people seem to want to commend these clowns.

by **Drop Your Pants** » Sun Mar 20, 2011 12:04 pm

Even though i'm a "naughty fenda" i agree with the idea of commending TBH. They're one of the best raider groups out there, i've never had any bad dealings with them. I might have been booted out of countless regions by them but it was never done cruelly, always with a friendly nod and maybe a bit of a chat.

IMPRESSED that the recent success of the Hawks has not resulted in the adoption of methods such as grieving and the expulsion of natives,

I don't think theres a raider group out there who can claim they've never griefed or kicked natives, it also brings up the messy conversation on what makes someone a native.

All i can say is i hope this doesn't fail because you are raiders. It has been a pleasure to work against TBH in my time in NS and they really deserve to be commended for the time and effort they've put into making the game fun for themselves and for others.

by **Tim-Opolis WA Puppet** » Sun Mar 20, 2011 6:21 pm

I would vote yest for both the commend and the condemn...

2 reasons

1) they deserve both
2) just imagine how awesome both badges would look in the region :lol:

by **The Murtunian Tribes** » Sun Mar 20, 2011 8:10 pm

Drop Your Pants wrote:Even though i'm a "naughty fenda" i agree with the idea of commending TBH. They're one of the best raider groups out there, i've never had any bad dealings with them. I might have been booted out of countless regions by them but it was never done cruelly, always with a friendly nod and maybe a bit of a chat.

IMPRESSED that the recent success of the Hawks has not resulted in the adoption of methods such as grieving and the expulsion of natives,

I don't think theres a raider group out there who can claim they've never griefed or kicked natives, it also brings up the messy conversation on what makes someone a native.

All i can say is i hope this doesn't fail because you are raiders. It has been a pleasure to work against TBH in my time in NS and they really deserve to be commended for the time and effort they've put into making the game fun for themselves and for others.

There is no such thing as a native.

by **Tim-Opolis WA Puppet** » Mon Mar 21, 2011 3:05 pm

I think that a native has been classified as somebody who has been in the region for atleast 6 months or is one of the first members of the region...

But this is off topic and mods will hate on us for it if it keeps going on.... so

Back to the debate

by **Mahaj WA Seat** » Mon Mar 21, 2011 5:42 pm

Tim-Opolis WA Puppet wrote:I think that a native has been classified as somebody who has been in the region for atleast 6 months or is one of the first members of the region...

But this is off topic and mods will hate on us for it if it keeps going on.... so

Back to the debate

I'm going to call absolute nonsense on that one.

by **Aglrinia** » Mon Mar 21, 2011 6:34 pm

I think honestly Raiding should be commended all together as the Rejected Realms is beginning to fall behind in population count, and should be at number seven not number ten, for regions with the highest population count.

by **Flemingovia** » Tue Mar 22, 2011 3:26 am

1. You need to look at the grammar of the proposal. You refer to TBH in both the singular and the collective.

"NOTING that the Black Hawks have, since it's creation in 2004, become one of the most respected raider organizations in the World,"

Should be

"NOTING that the Black Hawks have, since their creation in 2004, become one of the most respected raider organizations in the World,"
or
"NOTING that the Black Hawks has, since it's creation in 2004, become one of the most respected raider organizations in the World,"

2. On principle I do not vote for resolutions where people ask for themselves to be commended, either as nations or regions. If you are praiseworthy, others will recognise it. Putting oneself forward for an award just comes across as attention-needy. As such, I would vote against.

by **Halcones** » Tue Mar 22, 2011 7:25 am

It was proposed by someone outside of TBH who recognises their efforts.

by **Flemingovia** » Tue Mar 22, 2011 11:30 am

Yeah, but you wrote it. Still smacks of "look at me! Notice meeeeeee!"

And the grammar are still rubbish.

See what I mean?

by **Tim-Opolis WA Puppet** » Tue Mar 22, 2011 2:08 pm

He has a fair point. But I dont think grammar would influence the votes and approvals proposal... this is a commendation for raiding. not for being grammatically correct

by **Drop Your Pants** » Tue Mar 22, 2011 3:40 pm

Its affecting me, i'd love to see them commended but maybe with a more detailed proposal and better grammar like flem mentioned.

by **Mahaj WA Seat** » Tue Mar 22, 2011 3:40 pm

Drop Your Pants wrote:Its affecting me, i'd love to see them commended but maybe with a more detailed proposal and better grammar like flem mentioned.

Would you approve this one?

by **Krusoya** » Tue Mar 22, 2011 7:16 pm

Wow this is not commendable :roll:

by **Soaring Tikal** » Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:16 am

This failed to attain quorum by one WAD.

by **Celtic Independence** » Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:19 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:I wholeheartedly support this proposistion.

I second that

Commend The Black Hawks

Who is online