Advertisement
by Cinistra » Sun Mar 13, 2011 4:37 am
by Sremski okrug » Sun Mar 13, 2011 4:39 am
IC: The Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.The IMF and World Bank are terrorist organizations.
"Our future destiny rests with us, sometimes this makes us afraid but then we remember we have Partisans blood and we know what we're here for. You can count on us" - Day of Youth
"We're Tito. Tito is Ours"
by Cinistra » Sun Mar 13, 2011 8:03 am
Halcones wrote:So what do you agree with?
by Mike Hawks » Sun Mar 13, 2011 8:28 am
by The Murtunian Tribes » Sun Mar 13, 2011 8:45 am
by Cinistra » Sun Mar 13, 2011 12:25 pm
The Murtunian Tribes wrote:AGAINST. Commending raiders for raiding is lame. Besides, I think they just got there feelings hurt over being nominated for a condemnations.
by Mahaj WA Seat » Sun Mar 13, 2011 2:42 pm
Georgism wrote:Fuck off you cunt, I'm always nice.
NERVUN wrote:Yog zap!
Cool Egg Sandwich wrote:I am the Urinater..... I'll be back.
Jedi Utopians wrote:5) Now, saying that a nation couldn't be part of OPEC would be bold. AIPEC sounds like something you'd want to get checked out by a physician for.
by Lokemburg » Sun Mar 13, 2011 7:29 pm
by New Britanniaa » Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:54 am
by Soaring Tikal » Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:35 am
by Tim-Opolis WA Puppet » Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:45 am
by Lokemburg » Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:52 am
Soaring Tikal wrote:First, I would like to point out that this is just a debate of the proposal.
The Final proposal will be presented by a nation that is not a member of TBH, who does so gladly after having seen the proposal, which would not have happened without my campaigning for it.
So, those objections are at the moment void.
And even if I were the one proposing it, I fail to see how "They want it, therefore they can't have it" is a good reason to deny a commendation.
I did not receive orders from my superior officials to make it. I proposed it because having taken a look a the history of TBH, and having an inside view of it, I felt it was deserved, so I put my legislative skills to use.
by The Murtunian Tribes » Mon Mar 14, 2011 9:51 am
by TheThanksgiving Turkey » Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:16 pm
Cinistra wrote:The rules concerning griefing was abolished when regional influence was introduced to the game, and TTT's droning about that particular issue is no longer relevant. TTT's faction in Republicans was not able to hold on to the political power in the region. The new regime consider the faction to TTT belongs is no longer significant, and will work for the final closure of that faction in Republicans. It would have been nice if these nations came to understand the shift in the political landscape and left Republicans voluntarily. As this is not the case, our delegate in Republicans will have to find solutions which is to the best for the future life of Republicans.
Also, the term "native" is arbitrary. No such term exists in NS. Thus, TTT can not call for special treatment or privileges in Republicans by referring to this term. His time in Republicans has expired, and sending in puppets with silly proclamations only cements that decision.
It's also quite disgusting that TTT uses his well deserved demise in Republicans to hijack this thread. His rantings on this thread has not proved that TBH is not worth a commendation.
by Mountain Ash Forests » Mon Mar 14, 2011 6:49 pm
by The Anglian Republics » Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:10 pm
The problem that the FTAR have with this resolution is as much to do with the way in which it has come about and has been brought up before this council. I'm one of those old-fashioned people who believes that if you want, you don't ask. Personally, the fact that a member of The Black Hawks is responsible for proposing a commendation for his own organisation says to me one of two things; either that The Black Hawks are extremely vain and believe that a majority of the members of this council will support their commendation, or that they feel that their empire is now so massive that the maths mean that, if this is brought before the council, there is no way they can lose. The FTAR don't like arrogance and we don't appreciate organisations shamelessly nominating themselves for the commendation of this council.
The other problem that we have with this resolution is the fact that it presupposes that the blatant acts of agression carried out by The Black Hawks are 'for the greater good', and are appreciated by members of the regions which fall victim to their hegemony. I call upon The Black Hawks to provide definitive proof that a majority of the members of the regions which they raid are glad of their presence, and to demonstrate the procedures which are in place to allow the existing members of the region to return to self-determination if they no longer feel the presence of TBH is warranted.
by Jahka » Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:22 pm
Halcones wrote:They are indeed a defender affiliated region. Check out Crusaders of Justice, a "proud" FRA member region. It is true that Spartz tried to refound TCOJ. Unfortunately he was duped.
by TheThanksgiving Turkey » Sat Mar 19, 2011 5:12 pm
Jahka wrote:Halcones wrote:They are indeed a defender affiliated region. Check out Crusaders of Justice, a "proud" FRA member region. It is true that Spartz tried to refound TCOJ. Unfortunately he was duped.
Wait, what? You raided, THE Crusaders of Justice. That's not a defender region as you claim. Crusaders of Justice is, but there is no article before the word crusaders in their name of the region. THE Crusaders of Justice is just some region people made to imitate them.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement