NATION

PASSWORD

Commend The Black Hawks

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Cinistra
Diplomat
 
Posts: 863
Founded: Oct 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Cinistra » Sun Mar 13, 2011 4:37 am

The rules concerning griefing was abolished when regional influence was introduced to the game, and TTT's droning about that particular issue is no longer relevant. TTT's faction in Republicans was not able to hold on to the political power in the region. The new regime consider the faction to TTT belongs is no longer significant, and will work for the final closure of that faction in Republicans. It would have been nice if these nations came to understand the shift in the political landscape and left Republicans voluntarily. As this is not the case, our delegate in Republicans will have to find solutions which is to the best for the future life of Republicans.
Also, the term "native" is arbitrary. No such term exists in NS. Thus, TTT can not call for special treatment or privileges in Republicans by referring to this term. His time in Republicans has expired, and sending in puppets with silly proclamations only cements that decision.
It's also quite disgusting that TTT uses his well deserved demise in Republicans to hijack this thread. His rantings on this thread has not proved that TBH is not worth a commendation.
"Send forth all legions! Do not stop the attack until the city is taken! Slay them all!"
>Can I invade other people's regions?

Yes. The practice of "region crashing," where a group of nations all move to a region with the aim of seizing the WA Delegate position, is part of the game. Certain groups within NationStates are particularly adroit at this, and can attack very quickly.
>Once I've taken over a region, can I eject everyone else?

You can try. Invader Delegates tend to have very little Regional Influence, which makes ejecting long-time residents difficult. But Delegates can be as kind, generous, evil, or despotic as they wish. It's up to regional residents to elect good Delegates.

User avatar
Sremski okrug
Minister
 
Posts: 3177
Founded: Jul 02, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sremski okrug » Sun Mar 13, 2011 4:39 am

It's pretty disgusting on both sides. I've been reading this and I don't agree with either of your arguments.
IC: The Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.
The IMF and World Bank are terrorist organizations.
"Our future destiny rests with us, sometimes this makes us afraid but then we remember we have Partisans blood and we know what we're here for. You can count on us" - Day of Youth
"We're Tito. Tito is Ours"

Druze Tito, Bela Lica
Tito, je naše sunce
Yugoslav culture
R.I.P Jovanka Broz

User avatar
Halcones
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 183
Founded: May 08, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Halcones » Sun Mar 13, 2011 7:41 am

So what do you agree with?

User avatar
Cinistra
Diplomat
 
Posts: 863
Founded: Oct 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Cinistra » Sun Mar 13, 2011 8:03 am

Halcones wrote:So what do you agree with?

Himself, I think :blink:
"Send forth all legions! Do not stop the attack until the city is taken! Slay them all!"
>Can I invade other people's regions?

Yes. The practice of "region crashing," where a group of nations all move to a region with the aim of seizing the WA Delegate position, is part of the game. Certain groups within NationStates are particularly adroit at this, and can attack very quickly.
>Once I've taken over a region, can I eject everyone else?

You can try. Invader Delegates tend to have very little Regional Influence, which makes ejecting long-time residents difficult. But Delegates can be as kind, generous, evil, or despotic as they wish. It's up to regional residents to elect good Delegates.

User avatar
Mike Hawks
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 19
Founded: Mar 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike Hawks » Sun Mar 13, 2011 8:28 am

Abstain.

Sounds like you guys are good raiders but in some cases it sounds like you use BS tactics to take over regions.

User avatar
The Murtunian Tribes
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6919
Founded: Oct 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Murtunian Tribes » Sun Mar 13, 2011 8:45 am

AGAINST. Commending raiders for raiding is lame. Besides, I think they just got there feelings hurt over being nominated for a condemnations.

User avatar
Halcones
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 183
Founded: May 08, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Halcones » Sun Mar 13, 2011 12:07 pm

Actually I'm quite pleased. Shows we're doing a good job.

User avatar
Cinistra
Diplomat
 
Posts: 863
Founded: Oct 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Cinistra » Sun Mar 13, 2011 12:25 pm

The Murtunian Tribes wrote:AGAINST. Commending raiders for raiding is lame. Besides, I think they just got there feelings hurt over being nominated for a condemnations.

Fendas are getting commended for defending all the time. Time to balance that out.
"Send forth all legions! Do not stop the attack until the city is taken! Slay them all!"
>Can I invade other people's regions?

Yes. The practice of "region crashing," where a group of nations all move to a region with the aim of seizing the WA Delegate position, is part of the game. Certain groups within NationStates are particularly adroit at this, and can attack very quickly.
>Once I've taken over a region, can I eject everyone else?

You can try. Invader Delegates tend to have very little Regional Influence, which makes ejecting long-time residents difficult. But Delegates can be as kind, generous, evil, or despotic as they wish. It's up to regional residents to elect good Delegates.

User avatar
Mahaj WA Seat
Minister
 
Posts: 2091
Founded: Nov 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mahaj WA Seat » Sun Mar 13, 2011 2:42 pm

Cinistra wrote:
The Murtunian Tribes wrote:AGAINST. Commending raiders for raiding is lame. Besides, I think they just got there feelings hurt over being nominated for a condemnations.

Fendas are getting commended for defending all the time. Time to balance that out.

Agreed. That summed it up beautifully. Although there was Commend The Skeleton Army...
Member of The South and Osiris
Representing Mahaj in the World Assembly.
The Mahaj Factbook.


Author of Missing Minors Act (Repealed) and In Regards to Cloning
Mike the Progressive wrote:
Brogavia wrote:Fuck bitches, get money.
You shall be my god.

Georgism wrote:Fuck off you cunt, I'm always nice.

NERVUN wrote:Yog zap!

Cool Egg Sandwich wrote:I am the Urinater..... I'll be back.

Jedi Utopians wrote:5) Now, saying that a nation couldn't be part of OPEC would be bold. AIPEC sounds like something you'd want to get checked out by a physician for.


User avatar
Lokemburg
Diplomat
 
Posts: 935
Founded: Mar 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lokemburg » Sun Mar 13, 2011 7:29 pm

Lokemburg is against this proposal as it was proposed by a member of The Black Hawks and not by an outside source. If a nation that is not part of The Black Hawks was to propose this idea than I would be for it as they do deserve it but I cannot support THIS proclimation as it was proposed by a member of THB.
"I know not with what weapons
World War III will be fought,
but World War IV will be fought
with sticks and stones."
-Albert Einstein

LONG LIVE F7!

Proud Member of the International Criminal Police and Peacekeepers Organization

DEFCON: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

National Saying:
"Being born from the Ashes of War. The Pheonix shall be our guardian as we continue throughout the passage of time"

Anthem:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_ZMmEFA4Q0

Conflicts and Outcomes
Socialist Rebellion: Victory (with heavy losses)
War of Kolmakova: Victory

A Story I Wrote:
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=103814

User avatar
Halcones
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 183
Founded: May 08, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Halcones » Sun Mar 13, 2011 10:05 pm

You have a good point there but the member of TBH who proposed it is also a member of other regions, so they have both an outside and inside view.

User avatar
New Britanniaa
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 17
Founded: Jun 27, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby New Britanniaa » Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:54 am

I can guarantee the support of myself and most likely NBE.

User avatar
Soaring Tikal
Secretary
 
Posts: 32
Founded: Feb 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Soaring Tikal » Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:35 am

First, I would like to point out that this is just a debate of the proposal.

The Final proposal will be presented by a nation that is not a member of TBH, who does so gladly after having seen the proposal, which would not have happened without my campaigning for it.

So, those objections are at the moment void.


And even if I were the one proposing it, I fail to see how "They want it, therefore they can't have it" is a good reason to deny a commendation.

I did not receive orders from my superior officials to make it. I proposed it because having taken a look a the history of TBH, and having an inside view of it, I felt it was deserved, so I put my legislative skills to use.

User avatar
Tim-Opolis WA Puppet
Secretary
 
Posts: 36
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Tim-Opolis WA Puppet » Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:45 am

Completely agree. People don't realize how great raiders are... Hopefully TBH can get condemned and commended... That would be so awesome

User avatar
Lokemburg
Diplomat
 
Posts: 935
Founded: Mar 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lokemburg » Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:52 am

Soaring Tikal wrote:First, I would like to point out that this is just a debate of the proposal.

The Final proposal will be presented by a nation that is not a member of TBH, who does so gladly after having seen the proposal, which would not have happened without my campaigning for it.

So, those objections are at the moment void.


And even if I were the one proposing it, I fail to see how "They want it, therefore they can't have it" is a good reason to deny a commendation.

I did not receive orders from my superior officials to make it. I proposed it because having taken a look a the history of TBH, and having an inside view of it, I felt it was deserved, so I put my legislative skills to use.


Right, I understand your view. And I'm not saying that you don't deserve it just because you want it. You do deserve it. Which brings me to my second point, after getting some more added information to the... background, of this proposal, I am now for the Commendation of The Black Hawks.
"I know not with what weapons
World War III will be fought,
but World War IV will be fought
with sticks and stones."
-Albert Einstein

LONG LIVE F7!

Proud Member of the International Criminal Police and Peacekeepers Organization

DEFCON: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

National Saying:
"Being born from the Ashes of War. The Pheonix shall be our guardian as we continue throughout the passage of time"

Anthem:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_ZMmEFA4Q0

Conflicts and Outcomes
Socialist Rebellion: Victory (with heavy losses)
War of Kolmakova: Victory

A Story I Wrote:
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=103814

User avatar
The Murtunian Tribes
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6919
Founded: Oct 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Murtunian Tribes » Mon Mar 14, 2011 9:51 am

Cinistra wrote:
The Murtunian Tribes wrote:AGAINST. Commending raiders for raiding is lame. Besides, I think they just got there feelings hurt over being nominated for a condemnations.

Fendas are getting commended for defending all the time. Time to balance that out.


Why does it need balancing? I got into this argument with Todd a while back. I just don't see the point.

User avatar
TheThanksgiving Turkey
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 25
Founded: Mar 27, 2009
Capitalist Paradise

Postby TheThanksgiving Turkey » Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:16 pm

Cinistra wrote:The rules concerning griefing was abolished when regional influence was introduced to the game, and TTT's droning about that particular issue is no longer relevant. TTT's faction in Republicans was not able to hold on to the political power in the region. The new regime consider the faction to TTT belongs is no longer significant, and will work for the final closure of that faction in Republicans. It would have been nice if these nations came to understand the shift in the political landscape and left Republicans voluntarily. As this is not the case, our delegate in Republicans will have to find solutions which is to the best for the future life of Republicans.
Also, the term "native" is arbitrary. No such term exists in NS. Thus, TTT can not call for special treatment or privileges in Republicans by referring to this term. His time in Republicans has expired, and sending in puppets with silly proclamations only cements that decision.
It's also quite disgusting that TTT uses his well deserved demise in Republicans to hijack this thread. His rantings on this thread has not proved that TBH is not worth a commendation.


Part of the quote above in bold type indicates my emphasis.

Your fellow raider's comments in Republicans underscore that in fact regions do have identified natives -- and that banjecting them out of the region -- otherwise known as griefing -- is part of the intent of the invasion:

Republicans RMB:

-------
15 hours ago The Beer Gulping Bar of Hurly Burly Land

Nice to see Mr. Clinton visiting us. Brought some cigars with you, Bill? There's a lack of females in Republicans, though. Not even Mrs. Palin bothers to linger on here. BTW, it would have been so nice if you, Republican Bigots and Dark Princess (seems we got a female after all) joined the WA and endorsed ME. I have some tidying up to do. There are 6 "natives" who refuses to go to the reservation reserved for them. Atauro has been a nice boy and endorsed me already.
@Postian: Nice to hear that. Liberations are for pu***es, anyway. Ironic though that a region named Republicans has be liber(al)ated.
--------
Since the TBH started this process and its troopers continue to actively endorse this delegate, TBH should not be commended.

User avatar
Mountain Ash Forests
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 4
Founded: Jun 10, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Mountain Ash Forests » Mon Mar 14, 2011 6:49 pm

I fail to see what is commendable about moving 2 puppet nations into a region with no founder and fewer than two WA members. It's like shooting fish in a barrel - anyone (correction, any two people) can do it.

I would definitely commend the Blackhawks if they successfully raided a feeder region. That would be noteworthy.
Last edited by Mountain Ash Forests on Mon Mar 14, 2011 6:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Puppet of Errinundera

User avatar
Halcones
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 183
Founded: May 08, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Halcones » Tue Mar 15, 2011 5:17 am

The Black Hawks have actually raided valuable targets in the past. We have been around for over 5 years. Our raiding strategies are dynamic.

User avatar
Jeux II
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 356
Founded: Sep 07, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jeux II » Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:10 pm

So when is this, if at all, going to be submitted?
Always here and always bored. -_-
Wait I have an idea! Entertain me with your words!

Always loving Pacifica!

User avatar
Jahka
Attaché
 
Posts: 92
Founded: Apr 22, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Jahka » Thu Mar 17, 2011 3:06 pm

Face Dancers wrote:
Rawrgirnia wrote:
That might be true if you allowed the regions to die so someone new can have the name. Instead you turn them into space-wasting "colonies".

Against.

...regions which were defender affiliated (The Crusaders of Justice ...


The Crusaders of Justice was never a defender affiliated region. It was an attempt to imitate the real Crusaders in Equinox, who have since moved to the region Crusaders of Justice.

User avatar
Halcones
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 183
Founded: May 08, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Halcones » Fri Mar 18, 2011 5:25 am

They are indeed a defender affiliated region. Check out Crusaders of Justice, a "proud" FRA member region. It is true that Spartz tried to refound TCOJ. Unfortunately he was duped.

User avatar
The Anglian Republics
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: Mar 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Anglian Republics » Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:10 pm

*Representative Joshua Newman, sat behind a small sign reading The Anglian Republics and wearing a set of headphones, begins to speak:

The problem that the FTAR have with this resolution is as much to do with the way in which it has come about and has been brought up before this council. I'm one of those old-fashioned people who believes that if you want, you don't ask. Personally, the fact that a member of The Black Hawks is responsible for proposing a commendation for his own organisation says to me one of two things; either that The Black Hawks are extremely vain and believe that a majority of the members of this council will support their commendation, or that they feel that their empire is now so massive that the maths mean that, if this is brought before the council, there is no way they can lose. The FTAR don't like arrogance and we don't appreciate organisations shamelessly nominating themselves for the commendation of this council.

The other problem that we have with this resolution is the fact that it presupposes that the blatant acts of agression carried out by The Black Hawks are 'for the greater good', and are appreciated by members of the regions which fall victim to their hegemony. I call upon The Black Hawks to provide definitive proof that a majority of the members of the regions which they raid are glad of their presence, and to demonstrate the procedures which are in place to allow the existing members of the region to return to self-determination if they no longer feel the presence of TBH is warranted.
Last edited by The Anglian Republics on Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Jahka
Attaché
 
Posts: 92
Founded: Apr 22, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Jahka » Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:22 pm

Halcones wrote:They are indeed a defender affiliated region. Check out Crusaders of Justice, a "proud" FRA member region. It is true that Spartz tried to refound TCOJ. Unfortunately he was duped.

Wait, what? You raided, THE Crusaders of Justice. That's not a defender region as you claim. Crusaders of Justice is, but there is no article before the word crusaders in their name of the region. THE Crusaders of Justice is just some region people made to imitate them.

User avatar
TheThanksgiving Turkey
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 25
Founded: Mar 27, 2009
Capitalist Paradise

Postby TheThanksgiving Turkey » Sat Mar 19, 2011 5:12 pm

Jahka wrote:
Halcones wrote:They are indeed a defender affiliated region. Check out Crusaders of Justice, a "proud" FRA member region. It is true that Spartz tried to refound TCOJ. Unfortunately he was duped.

Wait, what? You raided, THE Crusaders of Justice. That's not a defender region as you claim. Crusaders of Justice is, but there is no article before the word crusaders in their name of the region. THE Crusaders of Justice is just some region people made to imitate them.


Perhaps NS Moderation should intervene here, as there could be an honest confusion with the region Crusaders of Justice -- or if Halcones were consistent the TBH might simply give up the region, much as The Chicken Army gave up Black Hawks.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads