Advertisement

by Tim-Opolis » Fri Sep 29, 2017 2:49 pm
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic
by Fauxia » Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:04 pm
Sandaoguo wrote:a den of cynics and nihilists

by TURTLESHROOM II » Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:11 pm

by Tim-Opolis » Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:16 pm
Fauxia wrote:Condemn Vandoosa is resolution. 188, ftr. 189 is Liberate St. Abby
TURTLESHROOM II wrote:The unauthorized turtle hiding in the vents of the WA office building spoke from above the Resolution's planning room.
"Repealing a Condemnation of a Raider ain't somethin' I support, personally, but I agree that a Founduh should not be Condemned for neglectin' his Region or for allowin' an invasion to happen. That's 'specially so 'cause he might be busy with his nation or, ya know, carin' for his nation's people first and foremost. Or he delegates to a civil servant and that subordinate was incompetent."

<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic
by Fauxia » Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:23 pm
Sandaoguo wrote:a den of cynics and nihilists

by Tim-Opolis » Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:24 pm
Fauxia wrote:When you notice the keeper of the SC resolutions has one of the numbers wrong![]()
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic

by TURTLESHROOM II » Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:28 pm
Tim-Opolis wrote:Not sure if that's support or not?

by Tim-Opolis » Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:34 pm
TURTLESHROOM II wrote:Tim-Opolis wrote:Not sure if that's support or not?
The ceiling turtle paused for a moment, himself confused about the Resolution.
"Well, that depends, ta be frank. Ya'll weren't really clear if you were condemnin' the Founduh for bein' lazy or the Region for bein' Raider trash. It was a real confusin' Resolution if ya ask me."

<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic

by Vando0sa » Sat Sep 30, 2017 3:50 am

by Tim-Opolis » Thu Dec 21, 2017 8:43 am
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic

by Queen Yuno » Thu Dec 21, 2017 11:15 am
by Fauxia » Thu Dec 21, 2017 12:44 pm
Sandaoguo wrote:a den of cynics and nihilists

by Tim-Opolis » Thu Dec 21, 2017 4:13 pm
Queen Yuno wrote:Vando0sa will just get condemned again if this passed. This repeal doesn't have much information, if any, outside of proclaiming as founder of Iwaku, they weren't at fault for neglecting it during invasion.
Would be cool to add more content.
Anyway, I still believe raiders should get their condemns and defenders get their commends. Not sure what else would warrant Condemns aside from legal in character villianous actions.
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic

by Queen Yuno » Thu Dec 21, 2017 10:43 pm
Tim-Opolis wrote:Queen Yuno wrote:Vando0sa will just get condemned again if this passed. This repeal doesn't have much information, if any, outside of proclaiming as founder of Iwaku, they weren't at fault for neglecting it during invasion.
Would be cool to add more content.
Anyway, I still believe raiders should get their condemns and defenders get their commends. Not sure what else would warrant Condemns aside from legal in character villianous actions.
Raiders should get their condemns, but it should be for those who deserve it. What the fuck has Vandoosa actually done to deserve a condemnation? You say he'll just get condemned again, but I struggle to see what a well-educated SC will condemn him for. He's a rank and file R/Der who does nothing but tag mostly, isn't involved in leadership, doesn't particularly have an SC-worthy resume outside of that, and frankly has become less condemnable since his Condemnation if anything.

by Pollaetorian » Fri Dec 22, 2017 12:52 am

by Mallorea and Riva » Fri Dec 22, 2017 1:59 pm

by Vulturret » Fri Dec 22, 2017 2:21 pm

by The Atlae Isles » Fri Dec 22, 2017 2:25 pm

by Consular » Sat Dec 23, 2017 12:04 am
Mallorea and Riva wrote:I'm not sure why we'd glorify someone for RMB spam and some tags. What significant occupations did they lead? And I don't mean "participated in", I mean which ones did they plan out/serve as point on?
Without something to that effect I don't see why we should oppose the repeal.

by Benevolent Thomas » Sat Dec 23, 2017 9:52 am
Mallorea and Riva wrote:I'm not sure why we'd glorify someone for RMB spam and some tags. What significant occupations did they lead? And I don't mean "participated in", I mean which ones did they plan out/serve as point on?
Without something to that effect I don't see why we should oppose the repeal.
Ballotonia wrote:Personally, I think there's something seriously wrong with a game if it willfully allows the destruction of longtime player communities in favor of kids whose sole purpose is to enjoy ruining the game for others.

by McMannia Times Six » Sat Dec 23, 2017 2:27 pm

by Benevolent Thomas » Sat Dec 23, 2017 3:23 pm
McMannia Times Six wrote:I do not support. One does not need to be a super villain to earn this most prestigious of awards, trying to revoking it on those grounds is a waste of SC time.


Ballotonia wrote:Personally, I think there's something seriously wrong with a game if it willfully allows the destruction of longtime player communities in favor of kids whose sole purpose is to enjoy ruining the game for others.

by McMannia Times Six » Sat Dec 23, 2017 4:04 pm
Benevolent Thomas wrote:McMannia Times Six wrote:I do not support. One does not need to be a super villain to earn this most prestigious of awards, trying to revoking it on those grounds is a waste of SC time.
This is just McMannia hoping for a Condemnation for his own lackluster record
I wub you McMannia

by Vando0sa » Tue Dec 26, 2017 12:32 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: The Ankhalic Vaspriot
Advertisement