[Draft] Liberate LASAGNA PART TWO

[Outer Sparta]

No he doesnt have to.
And no he was not, you just twisted his words.

Really? So this post is a figment of my imagination then?

So which side according to them deserves a condemnation?

[WayNeacTia]

Really? So this post is a figment of my imagination then?

So which side according to them deserves a condemnation?

Who knows at this point? With the amount of gibberish and triple posts going on, who the hell can keep track. Probably Mall, he seems like a good choice to condemn over this.

[United England n Wales]

Really? So this post is a figment of my imagination then?

So which side according to them deserves a condemnation?

No one, this has dragged on way too long.

[United England n Wales]

No he doesnt have to.
And no he was not, you just twisted his words.

Really? So this post is a figment of my imagination then?

I thinks it the way I have read it, my bad.

[WayNeacTia]

So which side according to them deserves a condemnation?

No one, this has dragged on way too long.

Really? No one deserves a condemnation? Also let me give you a pointer. You see that edit button at the top of a post after you made it? How about you try using it, instead of double and triple posting mmmkay? You already saw Sedge have a word with Leo about a few pages back.

[United England n Wales]

No one, this has dragged on way too long.

Really? No one deserves a condemnation? Also let me give you a pointer. You see that edit button at the top of a post after you made it? How about you try using it, instead of double and triple posting mmmkay? You already saw Sedge have a word with Leo about a few pages back.

I have had time to reflect on what has been said and a condemnation is not warrented.
Er no Sedge told him off for quad posting, which was triple.
I will try to avoid that.

[Outer Sparta]

Really? No one deserves a condemnation? Also let me give you a pointer. You see that edit button at the top of a post after you made it? How about you try using it, instead of double and triple posting mmmkay? You already saw Sedge have a word with Leo about a few pages back.

I have had time to reflect on what has been said and a condemnation is not warrented.
Er no Sedge told him off for quad posting, which was triple.
I will try to avoid that.

Please specify who deserves a condemnation in your earlier post Wayneactia pointed out.

[Bhang Bhang Duc]

I see this has been submitted. Well it’s not very well written, zero research on reasons why anyone should support it and should disappear without trace in a few days.

Yes, it will get the usual rubber stampers approving it, but let’s face it they wouldn’t know a good (or legal) proposal if it got up and bit them.

Quality doesn't matters, the result does

And here’s your result.

The Security Council proposal "Liberate LASAGNA PART TWO" [United Nations organisation] failed to achieve quorum.

Told you so.

[United England n Wales]

I have had time to reflect on what has been said and a condemnation is not warrented.
Er no Sedge told him off for quad posting, which was triple.
I will try to avoid that.

Please specify who deserves a condemnation in your earlier post Wayneactia pointed out.

If you read my post I have said noone deserves a condemnation since I CHANGED my mind.

[Mathuvan Union]

Quality doesn't matters, the result does

And here’s your result.

The Security Council proposal "Liberate LASAGNA PART TWO" [United Nations organisation] failed to achieve quorum.

Told you so.

What, so you want a fucking reward for being right? You’re just cracking on about the tiny pieces of shit in proposals. You don’t actually give proposals a chance in any way because all you say is they’re bad. It had decent support to it.

[Team Leo]

Quality doesn't matters, the result does

And here’s your result.

The Security Council proposal "Liberate LASAGNA PART TWO" [United Nations organisation] failed to achieve quorum.

Told you so.

Alright we know. Just shut your mouth please

[Sedgistan]

Alright we know. Just shut your mouth please

This is the second thread you've made a similar comment in. Rather than running around after your Old Zealand friends joining in the low-grade harassment of Bhang Bhang Duc and Wayneactia like a second-rate cheerleader, try putting some effort into your contributions, and then people might be inclined to listen to you. And if you don't have anything meaningful to post, then don't post.

If you keep this current behaviour up, you will be picking up warnings too.

[Mathuvan Union]

Alright we know. Just shut your mouth please

This is the second thread you've made a similar comment in. Rather than running around after your Old Zealand friends joining in the low-grade harassment of Bhang Bhang Duc and Wayneactia like a second-rate cheerleader, try putting some effort into your contributions, and then people might be inclined to listen to you. And if you don't have anything meaningful to post, then don't post.

If you keep this current behaviour up, you will be picking up warnings too.

What, so we are all in Old Zealand harassing BBH? I don’t think so. I haven’t harassed Bhang Bhang Duc. Dare I say that comment is a bit rude, considering the calling of Team Leo being a second rate cheerleader

[United England n Wales]

Alright we know. Just shut your mouth please

This is the second thread you've made a similar comment in. Rather than running around after your Old Zealand friends joining in the low-grade harassment of Bhang Bhang Duc and Wayneactia like a second-rate cheerleader, try putting some effort into your contributions, and then people might be inclined to listen to you. And if you don't have anything meaningful to post, then don't post.

If you keep this current behaviour up, you will be picking up warnings too.

Hang on this is wrong, there is no low-grade harassment of Bhang Bhang Duc and Wayneactia.
second-rate cheerleader, wow just plain rude.

This is the second thread you've made a similar comment in. Rather than running around after your Old Zealand friends joining in the low-grade harassment of Bhang Bhang Duc and Wayneactia like a second-rate cheerleader, try putting some effort into your contributions, and then people might be inclined to listen to you. And if you don't have anything meaningful to post, then don't post.

If you keep this current behaviour up, you will be picking up warnings too.

What, so we are all in Old Zealand harassing BBH? I don’t think so. I haven’t harassed Bhang Bhang Duc. Dare I say that comment is a bit rude, considering the calling of Team Leo being a second rate cheerleader

Same here very rude and uncalled for.

[Team Leo]

Alright we know. Just shut your mouth please

This is the second thread you've made a similar comment in. Rather than running around after your Old Zealand friends joining in the low-grade harassment of Bhang Bhang Duc and Wayneactia like a second-rate cheerleader, try putting some effort into your contributions, and then people might be inclined to listen to you. And if you don't have anything meaningful to post, then don't post.

If you keep this current behaviour up, you will be picking up warnings too.

snip

[Team Leo]

Alright we know. Just shut your mouth please

This is the second thread you've made a similar comment in. Rather than running around after your Old Zealand friends joining in the low-grade harassment of Bhang Bhang Duc and Wayneactia like a second-rate cheerleader, try putting some effort into your contributions, and then people might be inclined to listen to you. And if you don't have anything meaningful to post, then don't post.

If you keep this current behaviour up, you will be picking up warnings too.

snip

[Bhang Bhang Duc]

The three of you are unbelievable. You just received some friendly advice from a Moderator about your behaviour in this forum and yet you continue to argue.

Time to pull your heads in.

[United England n Wales]

The three of you are unbelievable. You just received some friendly advice from a Moderator about your behaviour in this forum and yet you continue to argue.

Time to pull your heads in.

Yer being rude is friendly advice.

Last time I checked Seg was not even talking to me, he was talking to Team Leo.

[Team Leo]

The three of you are unbelievable. You just received some friendly advice from a Moderator about your behaviour in this forum and yet you continue to argue.

Time to pull your heads in.

Alright fine lets just stop this already, I aplogize to BBD and other people I have harrased

[Mathuvan Union]

The three of you are unbelievable. You just received some friendly advice from a Moderator about your behaviour in this forum and yet you continue to argue.

Time to pull your heads in.

You’re being a bit of a cocky one saying that, considering you have been decently rude to us but are cocky because we aren’t on the good side of moderation.

You pull your head in

This is the second thread you've made a similar comment in. Rather than running around after your Old Zealand friends joining in the low-grade harassment of Bhang Bhang Duc and Wayneactia like a second-rate cheerleader, try putting some effort into your contributions, and then people might be inclined to listen to you. And if you don't have anything meaningful to post, then don't post.

If you keep this current behaviour up, you will be picking up warnings too.

Wow so the game looks like it is engineered against us now... lol

Stop being an ass. The game isn’t engineered against you. You think that because moderators come after you. They do because you break the rules

[Numero Capitan]

I'm not sure I'm the best one to comment on this, but this has been an exceptionally bad example of lobbying for support in the Security Council.

This point seems to escape old players and new - if you want to pass a resolution you need to both be the perfect diplomat and make a compelling and coherent case within the text of your resolution itself. You need to take criticism on the chin and consider whether there are well justified reasons for standing your ground, or whether you should cede territory and revise your proposal accordingly. You need to be polite and good natured (even likeable) in your discussions with people - because logic, reason and justice don't win Security Council votes, the popular vote does.

Many authors forget that the majority of the 26,000 WA members and delegates will not necessarily read things in the same way as their circle of players. Some authors seem to lose sense entirely of the fact that you have to win people round to the arguments you are proposing - no matter what.

The attitude of those who presumably want/wanted this to pass in this thread seems to have doomed this proposals from the start. I would usually be sympathetic to Liberation proposals but a quick read through the discussion brought an instant 'nope' from me. I would recommend labelling this thread as [Abandoned] and only coming back to it with a new draft if you really still care about this in a few months time.

[United England n Wales]

I'm not sure I'm the best one to comment on this, but this has been an exceptionally bad example of lobbying for support in the Security Council.

This point seems to escape old players and new - if you want to pass a resolution you need to both be the perfect diplomat and make a compelling and coherent case within the text of your resolution itself. You need to take criticism on the chin and consider whether there are well justified reasons for standing your ground, or whether you should cede territory and revise your proposal accordingly. You need to be polite and good natured (even likeable) in your discussions with people - because logic, reason and justice don't win Security Council votes, the popular vote does.

Many authors forget that the majority of the 26,000 WA members and delegates will not necessarily read things in the same way as their circle of players. Some authors seem to lose sense entirely of the fact that you have to win people round to the arguments you are proposing - no matter what.

The attitude of those who presumably want/wanted this to pass in this thread seems to have doomed this proposals from the start. I would usually be sympathetic to Liberation proposals but a quick read through the discussion brought an instant 'nope' from me. I would recommend labelling this thread as [Abandoned] and only coming back to it with a new draft if you really still care about this in a few months time.

Tbh both sides are to blame by not keeping a cool head.
I think it is unfair to say the we had doomed it from the start.

However I and I hope others will take you comments on board.
It has turned in to total anarchy.

[Outer Sparta]

I'm not sure I'm the best one to comment on this, but this has been an exceptionally bad example of lobbying for support in the Security Council.

This point seems to escape old players and new - if you want to pass a resolution you need to both be the perfect diplomat and make a compelling and coherent case within the text of your resolution itself. You need to take criticism on the chin and consider whether there are well justified reasons for standing your ground, or whether you should cede territory and revise your proposal accordingly. You need to be polite and good natured (even likeable) in your discussions with people - because logic, reason and justice don't win Security Council votes, the popular vote does.

Many authors forget that the majority of the 26,000 WA members and delegates will not necessarily read things in the same way as their circle of players. Some authors seem to lose sense entirely of the fact that you have to win people round to the arguments you are proposing - no matter what.

The attitude of those who presumably want/wanted this to pass in this thread seems to have doomed this proposals from the start. I would usually be sympathetic to Liberation proposals but a quick read through the discussion brought an instant 'nope' from me. I would recommend labelling this thread as [Abandoned] and only coming back to it with a new draft if you really still care about this in a few months time.

Tbh both sides are to blame by not keeping a cool head.
I think it is unfair to say the we had doomed it from the start.

However I and I hope others will take you comments on board.
It has turned in to total anarchy.

The earlier yelling didn't really help nor was the not taking advice from the others like Way and BBD.

[LollerLand]

I'm not sure I'm the best one to comment on this, but this has been an exceptionally bad example of lobbying for support in the Security Council.

This point seems to escape old players and new - if you want to pass a resolution you need to both be the perfect diplomat and make a compelling and coherent case within the text of your resolution itself. You need to take criticism on the chin and consider whether there are well justified reasons for standing your ground, or whether you should cede territory and revise your proposal accordingly. You need to be polite and good natured (even likeable) in your discussions with people - because logic, reason and justice don't win Security Council votes, the popular vote does.

Many authors forget that the majority of the 26,000 WA members and delegates will not necessarily read things in the same way as their circle of players. Some authors seem to lose sense entirely of the fact that you have to win people round to the arguments you are proposing - no matter what.

The attitude of those who presumably want/wanted this to pass in this thread seems to have doomed this proposals from the start. I would usually be sympathetic to Liberation proposals but a quick read through the discussion brought an instant 'nope' from me. I would recommend labelling this thread as [Abandoned] and only coming back to it with a new draft if you really still care about this in a few months time.

Tbh both sides are to blame by not keeping a cool head.
I think it is unfair to say the we had doomed it from the start.

However I and I hope others will take you comments on board.
It has turned in to total anarchy.

The people whom you and your buddies got mad at for critiquing your poorly written proposal has nothing to lose if this proposal doesn't reach anywhere. If you really want this proposal to pass, the onus is on you to convince people of its merit and win them over to your side. And you definitely won't be able to win over people here in the SC by harassing highly experienced players like BBD and spamming. I would recommend that you scrap this proposal entirely and if you really want to give it a second go, read through past proposals that have passed along with their drafting threads so that you can get a better understanding of the kind of language that is to be used and the etiquette that are generally followed in SC.

Also to you and your friends from Old Zealand, kindly stop double posting. Use the edit button instead.

[United England n Wales]

Tbh both sides are to blame by not keeping a cool head.
I think it is unfair to say the we had doomed it from the start.

However I and I hope others will take you comments on board.
It has turned in to total anarchy.

The earlier yelling didn't really help nor was the not taking advice from the others like Way and BBD.

True.

Tbh both sides are to blame by not keeping a cool head.
I think it is unfair to say the we had doomed it from the start.

However I and I hope others will take you comments on board.
It has turned in to total anarchy.

The people whom you and your buddies got mad at for critiquing your poorly written proposal has nothing to lose if this proposal doesn't reach anywhere. If you really want this proposal to pass, the onus is on you to convince people of its merit and win them over to your side. And you definitely won't be able to win over people here in the SC by harassing highly experienced players like BBD and spamming. I would recommend that you scrap this proposal entirely and if you really want to give it a second go, read through past proposals that have passed along with their drafting threads so that you can get a better understanding of the kind of language that is to be used and the etiquette that are generally followed in SC.

Also to you and your friends from Old Zealand, kindly stop double posting. Use the edit button instead.

This was not even my proposal, so no it is not onus on me to convince people.
No one was harasssing BBD, he has been a highly rude on different fourms but because he is 'highly experienced' he can get away with shit like that.
Again you are preaching to the wrong person UNO is the one who created this, tell him.
I have only been on the fourms since Thursday and the 1st post I made bhang bhang duc was rude for no reason and has continued to do do, so I am now like fuck it I dont care about his opinions at all.

I do apologize for the double, triple posts.