Advertisement

by Adriatic Democratic Empire » Sat Sep 26, 2026 3:05 pm

by Inevitable Poverty » Sat Sep 26, 2026 9:46 pm
The North Pacific Deputy Minister of World Assembly Affairs and Deputy Speaker • TG’s and DM’s open • My discord is _inpov • he/it; either workAuthor of GA #13

by Kshemarashtram » Sun Sep 27, 2026 10:25 am
Aghast that these forces have taken to falsely representing themselves before this august body in order to sow more chaos in their bids for conquest,
AtaHana wrote:Adults are just kids who think they've grown up
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Call the doctor - sense of humour transplant required.

by Adriatic Democratic Empire » Sun Sep 27, 2026 11:55 am
Kshemarashtram wrote:Bah, no-brainer. Since the region has converted to a Stronghold and the Governor has consented to this repeal, Kshemarashtram votes FOR.
Since this is mostly a dead thread about a no-brainer proposal, I decided to ask a question about the target resolution. I see it has a clause:Aghast that these forces have taken to falsely representing themselves before this august body in order to sow more chaos in their bids for conquest,
What does this refer to exactly? What kind of "false representation" did the raiders engage in? Asking as it would be interesting to know what are the insidious strategies those infuriating raiders resort to rather than just 'crash, bang, wallop'.

by The Democratic Disney States » Sun Sep 27, 2026 12:00 pm

by The Ambis » Sun Sep 27, 2026 1:05 pm
Kshemarashtram wrote:Bah, no-brainer. Since the region has converted to a Stronghold and the Governor has consented to this repeal, Kshemarashtram votes FOR.
Since this is mostly a dead thread about a no-brainer proposal, I decided to ask a question about the target resolution. I see it has a clause:Aghast that these forces have taken to falsely representing themselves before this august body in order to sow more chaos in their bids for conquest,
What does this refer to exactly? What kind of "false representation" did the raiders engage in? Asking as it would be interesting to know what are the insidious strategies those infuriating raiders resort to rather than just 'crash, bang, wallop'.
Invea wrote: non-compliant W.A. members are fatigued by a practically non-dismissable notification, ... to the Ambis's delightSedgistan wrote: ...There's an obvious gameplay solution to that problem - burn Algerheaven to the ground. | "When Alger is the voice of reason, you know you have a problem"
by Omnicontrol » Mon Sep 28, 2026 10:10 am
Adriatic Democratic Empire wrote: idk. keep in the mind the repeal was meant to be a simple fast fire to prevent BOM Osiris and other raiders from passwording and transitioning the region. So It's not great but looking at the context of the proposal it wasn't worth mentioning

Reventus Koth wrote:you're right guys my bad the next time i write a treaty i'll make sure to leave the possibility of raiding the other signatory on the table
Black Lamia wrote:Every aspect of this site is an unpleasant chore to interact with.
United Calanworie wrote:…how… how many… of you use a kindle???? to access the web???

by URA World Assembly Affairs » Wed Sep 30, 2026 5:29 am


by Northern Slatavia » Wed Sep 30, 2026 7:28 am
URA World Assembly Affairs wrote:-snip-
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement