by Aussandries » Sun Jan 19, 2020 2:23 pm
by Kaboomlandia » Sun Jan 19, 2020 8:00 pm
by Aussandries » Mon Jan 20, 2020 10:36 am
Kaboomlandia wrote:No. They don’t deserve this attention. They got a liberation (ill advised, but that’s another story) and haven’t popped up in months.
by Kaboomlandia » Mon Jan 20, 2020 10:49 am
by Aussandries » Mon Jan 20, 2020 10:51 am
by Kuriko » Mon Jan 20, 2020 10:53 am
by Aussandries » Mon Jan 20, 2020 11:19 am
by WayNeacTia » Mon Jan 20, 2020 2:24 pm
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Aussandries » Mon Jan 20, 2020 3:23 pm
Wayneactia wrote:Aussandries wrote:bollocks - they are threatening my region, and this is the very purpose of the WA!
You are the founder of your region and have a non-exec delegate. They can't do shit to your region so stop with unnecessary drama. No one is going to vote to condemn them as it gives them way more attention than they need.
by Kuriko » Mon Jan 20, 2020 3:31 pm
Aussandries wrote:Wayneactia wrote:You are the founder of your region and have a non-exec delegate. They can't do shit to your region so stop with unnecessary drama. No one is going to vote to condemn them as it gives them way more attention than they need.
And this is the problem with the beurocratic nature of the WA! Cmon peeps - People in my country voted for Brexit to stop unelected beurocrats having all of the power (forgetting o'course that the house of lords is a thing.... ill say no more) - but this shouldn't happen in an online game, we should and must be better than this.
by Aussandries » Thu Jan 23, 2020 11:04 am
Kuriko wrote:Aussandries wrote:And this is the problem with the beurocratic nature of the WA! Cmon peeps - People in my country voted for Brexit to stop unelected beurocrats having all of the power (forgetting o'course that the house of lords is a thing.... ill say no more) - but this shouldn't happen in an online game, we should and must be better than this.
WA Delegates are elected twice a day >·>
by The Stalker » Thu Jan 23, 2020 12:05 pm
by WayNeacTia » Thu Jan 23, 2020 9:15 pm
The Stalker wrote:o liberations instead. Regions don't like them, and they provide a warning to others about the region, with the added bonus of potentially harming the region should it become founderless.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by The Stalker » Thu Jan 23, 2020 10:12 pm
Wayneactia wrote:The Stalker wrote:o liberations instead. Regions don't like them, and they provide a warning to others about the region, with the added bonus of potentially harming the region should it become founderless.
No they don't. They are an abuse of the liberation function and devalue it's actual usefulness when a region is under serious threat.
by WayNeacTia » Fri Jan 24, 2020 12:45 am
The Stalker wrote:Wayneactia wrote:No they don't. They are an abuse of the liberation function and devalue it's actual usefulness when a region is under serious threat.
Aggressive liberations have been around for some time now, and for some regions like confederation corrupt dictators, I feel it it helpful to serve as a warning to newer nations who don't know CCD's history.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by The Stalker » Fri Jan 24, 2020 9:32 am
Wayneactia wrote:The Stalker wrote:Aggressive liberations have been around for some time now, and for some regions like confederation corrupt dictators, I feel it it helpful to serve as a warning to newer nations who don't know CCD's history.
Show me a single offensive liberation that has actually achieved anything. The CCD liberation has done nothing but make them more vocal and actually caused their region to grow. Seems like it was fairly counter-intuitive.
by Bormiar » Fri Jan 24, 2020 9:36 am
The Stalker wrote:Wayneactia wrote:Show me a single offensive liberation that has actually achieved anything. The CCD liberation has done nothing but make them more vocal and actually caused their region to grow. Seems like it was fairly counter-intuitive.
It serves as warning, if even just one out of a hundred possible recruits decide not to join because of that warning I call it a win.
I find it odd you don't think we should warn new and younger players about the perils of regions like theirs.
by The Stalker » Fri Jan 24, 2020 10:14 am
Bormiar wrote:The Stalker wrote:
It serves as warning, if even just one out of a hundred possible recruits decide not to join because of that warning I call it a win.
I find it odd you don't think we should warn new and younger players about the perils of regions like theirs.
What about recruits that join because of the controversy?
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Fri Jan 24, 2020 10:19 am
Aussandries wrote:Hey guys, would love some feedback on my draft proposal before I put it in front of the WA - it is a serious issue, so please help me with it, and later approve it, thanks!
"Condemn Nazi Europa"
BELIEVING that Nazism and Fascism, in all its forms, is a blight on this world, and that only by firm action can we deter and show our dissatisfaction with them:
THIS MOTION WOULD CONDEMN Nazi Europa.
1)Nazi Europa has recently been threatening other regions, specifically The Slide Countries with invasion, for the simple act of removing embassies due to democratic process. These threats have forced The Slide Countries to take internal action on reducing the power of potentially unstable positions, to the detriment of individual nations.
2) Nazi Europa is ruled with an Iron Fist by a group of unaccountable nations with no scrutiny and with no democratic process.
3) They have harassed a diplomat in public, and increased tensions needlessly when appeasement was offered.
4) They have infiltrated an innocent nation to further their cause.
And, on a separate note, that they have used military force on a number of regions not listed in Security Council Resolution # 246 "Liberate Nazi Europa", bringing further suffering to freedom-loving regions and their members, as well as spreading Nazism on a wider scale.
In the light of their political ideologies and acts, this legislature would bring public shame upon them, and the scrutiny of the international community, which would aid an innocent region in a difficult situation.
HEREBY CONDEMMING Nazi Europa
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by WayNeacTia » Fri Jan 24, 2020 3:16 pm
The Stalker wrote:Wayneactia wrote:Show me a single offensive liberation that has actually achieved anything. The CCD liberation has done nothing but make them more vocal and actually caused their region to grow. Seems like it was fairly counter-intuitive.
It serves as warning, if even just one out of a hundred possible recruits decide not to join because of that warning I call it a win.
I find it odd you don't think we should warn new and younger players about the perils of regions like theirs.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by The Stalker » Fri Jan 24, 2020 4:35 pm
Wayneactia wrote:The Stalker wrote:
It serves as warning, if even just one out of a hundred possible recruits decide not to join because of that warning I call it a win.
I find it odd you don't think we should warn new and younger players about the perils of regions like theirs.
Oh, I fully believe we should be warning new nations about regions like those. Liberating them doesn't do that though, as most new players have no idea what a liberation is, nor do they read the passed resoultions. So it is pointless. CDS telegrams probably deter more people from those regions than their liberation's ever have.
by The Right of Might » Sat Jan 25, 2020 11:34 pm
The Stalker wrote:Wayneactia wrote:Oh, I fully believe we should be warning new nations about regions like those. Liberating them doesn't do that though, as most new players have no idea what a liberation is, nor do they read the passed resoultions. So it is pointless. CDS telegrams probably deter more people from those regions than their liberation's ever have.
I agree most probably don't read the liberation, but some do, and in my opinion it is better to at least have some kind of warning.
by Kaboomlandia » Mon Jan 27, 2020 12:10 am
Wayneactia wrote:The Stalker wrote:Aggressive liberations have been around for some time now, and for some regions like confederation corrupt dictators, I feel it it helpful to serve as a warning to newer nations who don't know CCD's history.
Show me a single offensive liberation that has actually achieved anything. The CCD liberation has done nothing but make them more vocal and actually caused their region to grow. Seems like it was fairly counter-intuitive.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement